IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/injoed/v113y2025ics0738059325000045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do public school teachers react to education policy reforms with their colleagues?: The emergence of policy discussion networks during the implementation of the national education strategic plan in Myanmar

Author

Listed:
  • Htun, Zue Wadi
  • Lim, Seunghoo

Abstract

Teachers working at the grassroots level of Myanmar’s educational bureaucracy are directly involved in the implementation of the basic educational reforms outlined in the National Education Strategic Plan. The aim of this study is to examine the formation of policy discussion networks among public school teachers during the implementation of the reforms as well as the ways in which the development of these discussion networks was affected by teachers’ perceptions of discretion, client meaningfulness, and willingness to implement the reforms. Teachers were involved in discussion connections that were developed on a reciprocal and transitive basis to facilitate their communication over time. When teachers perceived that the changes stipulated by the reforms offered greater benefits to their pupils and became more eager to implement these changes, they approached other teachers to discuss educational issues. This study provides theoretical and empirical contributions to the literature on street-level bureaucrats’ reactions to the implementation of policy reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Htun, Zue Wadi & Lim, Seunghoo, 2025. "How do public school teachers react to education policy reforms with their colleagues?: The emergence of policy discussion networks during the implementation of the national education strategic plan i," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0738059325000045
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000045
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa Monties & Stéphanie Gagnon, 2024. "Responding to reforms: resilience through rule-bending and workarounds in the police force," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 142-161, January.
    2. Lars Tummers & Victor Bekkers, 2014. "Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 527-547, May.
    3. Hiromi Nakazato & Rui Izumi & Seunghoo Lim, 2022. "Joining Policy Forums Together to Develop Ki-no-Eki , a Community Currency System for Forest Management in Japan: Dynamics of Policy Communication Networks," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Seunghoo Lim & Hiromi Nakazato, 2020. "The Emergence of Risk Communication Networks and the Development of Citizen Health-Related Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Social Selection and Contagion Processes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4590 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grimm, Sven & Reiners, Wulf & Braun, Mara & Donath, Laura & Hörbelt, Sophia & Lampert, Sophie & Wich, Marcel, 2024. "Digital transformation for a sustainable future: Insights from Brazil's civil service," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2024, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Khalid Mehmood & Yaser Iftikhar & Aamir Suhail & Adil Zia, 2024. "How high-involvement work practices, public service motivation, and employees’ commitment influence employees' proactive work behavior: evidence from China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 55-81, February.
    3. Mohammed Salah Hassan & Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin & Norma Mansor & Hussam Al Halbusi, 2021. "An Examination of Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Discretion and the Moderating Role of Supervisory Support: Evidence from the Field," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Bleda, Mercedes & Krupnik, Seweryn, 2024. "Risks of policy failure in direct R&D support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Miller, Fiona A. & Lehoux, Pascale, 2020. "The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    6. Shibaab Rahman & Prue Burns & Julie Wolfram Cox & Quamrul Alam, 2024. "Exercising bureaucratic discretion through selective bridging: A response to institutional complexity in Bangladesh," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(2), pages 61-74, May.
    7. Silva-Muller, Livio, 2022. "Payment for ecosystem services and the practices of environmental fieldworkers in policy implementation: The case of Bolsa Floresta in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Brattström, Erik & Hellström, Tomas, 2019. "Street-level priority-setting: The role of discretion in implementation of research, development, and innovation priorities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 240-247.
    9. Changkun Cai & Qiyao Shen & Na Tang, 2022. "Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street‐level bureaucrats from higher‐up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 55-71, February.
    10. Elizabeth A. Newnham & Peta L. Dzidic & Enrique L.P. Mergelsberg & Bhushan Guragain & Emily Ying Yang Chan & Yoshiharu Kim & Jennifer Leaning & Ryoma Kayano & Michael Wright & Lalindra Kaththiriarachc, 2020. "The Asia Pacific Disaster Mental Health Network: Setting a Mental Health Agenda for the Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-9, August.
    11. Maayan Davidovitz & Nissim Cohen, 2022. "Alone in the campaign: Distrust in regulators and the coping of front‐line workers," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1005-1021, October.
    12. Na Tang & Muyu He, 2023. "The times make a hero: Street‐level policy entrepreneurship in major crisis responses in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 490-508, July.
    13. Christi L. Gross & Jacob Church & Tiffany Taylor & Jackuelyn K. Towne‐Roese, 2018. "“Between a Rock and a Hard Place”: The Constraints of Welfare‐to‐Work Bureaucracies," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 39-56, March.
    14. Norin Arshed & Colin Mason & Sara Carter, 2016. "Exploring the disconnect in policy implementation: A case of enterprise policy in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1582-1611, December.
    15. Resnick, Danielle & Okumo, Austen, 2017. "Subnational Variation in Policy Implementation: The Case of Nigerian Land Governance Reform," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 265412, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    16. Valeria Biffi Isla, 2022. "Community‐level bureaucrats conserving the Peruvian Amazon," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 44-54, February.
    17. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Suzanne Rutz & Dinah Mathew & Paul Robben & Antoinette de Bont, 2017. "Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 81-94, March.
    19. Joanna Kowalczyk-Anioł & Karolina Kacprzak & Ewa Szafrańska, 2022. "How the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected the Functioning of Tourist Short-Term Rental Platforms (Airbnb and Vrbo) in Polish Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Peltomaa, Juha & Hildén, Mikael & Huttunen, Suvi, 2016. "Translating institutional change - forest journals as diverse policy actors," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-180.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0738059325000045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-educational-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.