IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v44y2024i2p61-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exercising bureaucratic discretion through selective bridging: A response to institutional complexity in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Shibaab Rahman
  • Prue Burns
  • Julie Wolfram Cox
  • Quamrul Alam

Abstract

We attempt to reconcile top‐down and bottom‐up perspectives on bureaucratic discretion to understand how actors ‘caught in the middle’, such as middle level public managers, negotiate conflicting demands to exercise discretion in the Bangladesh public administration. To do this, we employ the institutional logics framework, a theoretical lens that conceptualises how regulative, cultural forces bear down on actors, and also acknowledges actor agency. Based on 32 interviews with current and former public servants and local public administration experts, supported by secondary documentary analysis, we identify a new way in which discretion may be enacted in institutionally complex settings, offering a way to reconcile top‐down and bottom‐up perspectives. We term this response selective bridging—a sense‐making approach to exploit the complementarities of competing institutional forces from the top to exercise discretion for bottom‐up needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shibaab Rahman & Prue Burns & Julie Wolfram Cox & Quamrul Alam, 2024. "Exercising bureaucratic discretion through selective bridging: A response to institutional complexity in Bangladesh," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(2), pages 61-74, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:61-74
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.2036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.2036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pranab Panday, 2007. "Policy Implementation in Urban Bangladesh: Role of Intra-organizational Coordination," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 375-375, December.
    2. Stephen P. Osborne, 2006. "The New Public Governance?-super-1," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 377-387, September.
    3. Anat Gofen & Oliver Meza & Elizabeth Pérez Chiqués, 2022. "When street‐level implementation meets systemic corruption," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 72-84, February.
    4. Christopher G. Reddick & Hisham M. Abdelsalam & Hatem Elkadi, 2011. "The Influence Of E‐Government On Administrative Discretion: The Case Of Local Governments In Egypt," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(5), pages 390-407, December.
    5. Hasanuzzaman Zaman, 2015. "Service delivery process innovation: insights from Digital Bangladesh," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 165-168, April.
    6. Pranab Panday, 2007. "Policy Implementation in Urban Bangladesh: Role of Intra-organizational Coordination," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 237-259, September.
    7. Peter Hupe & Aurélien Buffat, 2014. "A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 548-569, May.
    8. Gabriela Lotta & Roberto Pires & Michael Hill & Marie Ostergaard Møller, 2022. "Recontextualizing street‐level bureaucracy in the developing world," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 3-10, February.
    9. Nilima Gulrajani & Willy McCourt & Willy McCourt & Nilima Gulrajani, 2010. "The future of development management: Introduction to the special issue," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(2), pages 81-90, May.
    10. Lhawang Ugyel, 2014. "Explaining Hybridity In Public Administration: An Empirical Case Of Bhutan'S Civil Service," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(2), pages 109-122, May.
    11. Donald F. Kettl, 1997. "The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 446-462.
    12. Jasper Hotho & Dana Minbaeva & Maral Muratbekova-Touron & Larissa Rabbiosi, 2020. "Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection: A Communal Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 659-679, September.
    13. Abdul‐Rahim Mohammed, 2022. "Discretion on the frontlines of the implementation of the Ghana School Feeding Programme: Street‐Level Bureaucrats adapting to austerity in northern Ghana," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 33-43, February.
    14. Civera, Chiara & Cortese, Damiano & Mosca, Fabrizio & Murdock, Alex, 2020. "Paradoxes and strategies in social enterprises’ dual logics enactment: A csQCA between Italy and the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 334-347.
    15. Lars Tummers & Victor Bekkers, 2014. "Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 527-547, May.
    16. Sergio A. Campos & Rik Peeters, 2022. "Policy improvisation: How frontline workers cope with public service gaps in developing countries—The case of Mexico's Prospera program," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 22-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niyazi Karabulut, 2024. "Street‐level bureaucracy in weak state institutions. By RikPeeters, GabrielaLotta, and FernandoNieto‐Morales, Bristol: Policy Press (Bristol University Press). 2024. pp. 252. £80. ISBN: 9781447368748," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(5), pages 427-430, December.
    2. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    4. Changkun Cai & Qiyao Shen & Na Tang, 2022. "Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street‐level bureaucrats from higher‐up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 55-71, February.
    5. Suzanne Rutz & Dinah Mathew & Paul Robben & Antoinette de Bont, 2017. "Enhancing responsiveness and consistency: Comparing the collective use of discretion and discretionary room at inspectorates in England and the Netherlands," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 81-94, March.
    6. Habib Zafarullah & Jannatul Ferdous, 2024. "Metropolitan Governance and Interorganizational Coordination: Study of a City Corporation in Bangladesh," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 97-117, March.
    7. Peltomaa, Juha & Hildén, Mikael & Huttunen, Suvi, 2016. "Translating institutional change - forest journals as diverse policy actors," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-180.
    8. Sergio Toro-Maureira & Alejandro Olivares & Rocio Saez-Vergara & Sebastian Valenzuela & Macarena Valenzuela & Teresa Correa, 2025. "The Missing Link: Identifying Digital Intermediaries in E-Government," Papers 2501.10846, arXiv.org.
    9. Gabriela Lotta & Fernando Nieto‐Morales & Rik Peeters, 2023. "“Nobody wants to be a dead hero”: Coping with precarity at the frontlines of the Brazilian and Mexican pandemic response," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(3), pages 232-244, August.
    10. Barbara Kożuch & Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, 2016. "Inter-Organisational Coordination for Sustainable Local Governance: Public Safety Management in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    12. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    13. Grimm, Sven & Reiners, Wulf & Braun, Mara & Donath, Laura & Hörbelt, Sophia & Lampert, Sophie & Wich, Marcel, 2024. "Digital transformation for a sustainable future: Insights from Brazil's civil service," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2024, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    14. Ahrum Chang, 2022. "A formal model of street-level bureaucracy," Rationality and Society, , vol. 34(1), pages 6-27, February.
    15. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Rizzo, Ilde, 2023. "How "one-size-fits-all" public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy," EconStor Preprints 270729, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. ter Bogt, Henk & Tillema, Sandra, 2016. "Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 5-23.
    17. Mihajla Gavin & Scott Fitzgerald & Susan McGrath-Champ, 2022. "From marketising to empowering: Evaluating union responses to devolutionary policies in education," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 80-99, March.
    18. Mohammed Salah Hassan & Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin & Norma Mansor & Hussam Al Halbusi, 2021. "An Examination of Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Discretion and the Moderating Role of Supervisory Support: Evidence from the Field," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Richard M Walker & Ling Hin Li, 2002. "Reinventing Government? Explaining Management Reform at the Hong Kong Housing Authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(4), pages 573-592, August.
    20. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1713 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Bleda, Mercedes & Krupnik, Seweryn, 2024. "Risks of policy failure in direct R&D support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:61-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.