IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ingrde/v2y2023i4s2949753123000541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on China's manufacturing carbon emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Yi, Jinchao
  • Hou, Yilin
  • Zhang, Zach Ziye

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of FDI on carbon emissions in China's manufacturing sector, using statistical data from 2003 to 2020 as a reference. To account for the heterogeneity of manufacturing industries, we classify them into three categories based on input factors: resource-intensive, technology-intensive, and labor-intensive. Our main findings are as follows: there is a negative correlation between FDI and CO2 emissions in manufacturing. Specifically, FDI has a positive effect on reducing carbon emissions in capital-intensive, technology-intensive, and labor-intensive manufacturing industries, with the strongest effect observed in labor-intensive industries. Foreign investment can contribute to improving energy efficiency in China's manufacturing sector, and there is potential for environmental regulation to further reduce carbon emissions in resource-intensive manufacturing. By analyzing the impact of FDI on carbon emissions in manufacturing and the role of manufacturing heterogeneity in carbon emissions, we aim to provide recommendations and strategies to help reduce the carbon footprint of manufacturing industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi, Jinchao & Hou, Yilin & Zhang, Zach Ziye, 2023. "The impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on China's manufacturing carbon emissions," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:2:y:2023:i:4:s2949753123000541
    DOI: 10.1016/j.igd.2023.100086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753123000541
    Download Restriction: Open-access
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hammond, G.P. & Norman, J.B., 2012. "Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 220-227.
    2. Robert Hoffmann & Chew-Ging Lee & Bala Ramasamy & Matthew Yeung, 2005. "FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 311-317.
    3. Susmita Dasgupta & Ashoka Mody & Subhendu Roy & David Wheeler, 2001. "Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 173-187.
    4. James A. Tobey, 1990. "The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 191-209, May.
    5. Petrović, Predrag & Lobanov, Mikhail M., 2022. "Energy intensity and foreign direct investment nexus: Advanced panel data analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Wang, Shaojian & Fang, Chuanglin & Guan, Xingliang & Pang, Bo & Ma, Haitao, 2014. "Urbanisation, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in China: A panel data analysis of China’s provinces," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 738-749.
    7. Zhu Liu & Dabo Guan & Scott Moore & Henry Lee & Jun Su & Qiang Zhang, 2015. "Climate policy: Steps to China's carbon peak," Nature, Nature, vol. 522(7556), pages 279-281, June.
    8. Huang, Junbing & Du, Dan & Tao, Qizhi, 2017. "An analysis of technological factors and energy intensity in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi He & Hongli Jiang, 2024. "Does the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Improve Carbon Emission Performance? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hettige, Hemamala & Mani, Muthukumara & Wheeler, David, 2000. "Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 445-476, August.
    2. Fernando Broner & Paula Bustos & Vasco Carvalho, 2011. "Sources of comparative advantage in polluting industries," Economics Working Papers 1331, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Dec 2019.
    3. Dhimitri Qirjo & Razvan Pascalau, 2019. "The Role of TTIP on the Environment," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1262-1285, April.
    4. Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi & Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Rault, Christophe & Sova, Robert & Sova, Anamaria, 2012. "Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Evidence from Romania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 130-139.
    5. Ilker Akar, 2019. "The Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Foreign Trade - A Survey on the Relation with Environment," Economics Literature, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 37-50, June.
    6. Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2020. "Spatial Differences in Carbon Intensity in Polish Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Quiroga, Miguel & Sterner, Thomas & Persson, Martin, 2007. "Have Countries with Lax Environmental Regulations a Comparative Advantage in Polluting Industries?," RFF Working Paper Series dp-07-08, Resources for the Future.
    8. Suárez-Varela, Marta & Rodríguez-Crespo, Ernesto, 2022. "Is dirty trade concentrating in more polluting countries? Evidence from Africa," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 728-744.
    9. Xiekui Zhang & Baocheng Yu, 2023. "The Impact of Ownership Structure on Technological Innovation and Energy Intensity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Eliste, Paavo & Fredriksson, Per G., 2002. "Environmental Regulations, Transfers, and Trade: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 234-250, March.
    11. Dasgupta, Susmita & Meisner, Craig & Wheeler, David & Jin, Yanhong, 2002. "Agricultural Trade, Development and Toxic Risk," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1401-1412, August.
    12. Cole, Matthew A. & Elliott, Robert J.R. & Shimamoto, Kenichi, 2005. "Why the grass is not always greener: the competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on US specialization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 95-109, July.
    13. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    14. Yang, Di & Luan, Weixin & Qiao, Lu & Pratama, Mahardhika, 2020. "Modeling and spatio-temporal analysis of city-level carbon emissions based on nighttime light satellite imagery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Myeong Hwan Kim & Nodir Adilov, 2012. "The lesser of two evils: an empirical investigation of foreign direct investment-pollution tradeoff," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(20), pages 2597-2606, July.
    16. Tsurumi Tetsuya & Managi Shunsuke & Hibiki Akira, 2015. "Do Environmental Regulations Increase Bilateral Trade Flows?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 1549-1577, October.
    17. Yang Lu, 2010. "Do environmental regulations influence the competitiveness of pollution-intensive products?," Frontiers of Economics in China, Springer;Higher Education Press, vol. 5(2), pages 276-298, June.
    18. Elmarzougui, Eskandar & Larue, Bruno & Tamini, Lota D., 2013. "The Environment, Trade Openness, and Domestic and Foreign Investments," MPRA Paper 61332, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    19. Matthew Cole, 2000. "Air Pollution and ‘Dirty’ Industries: How and Why Does the Composition of Manufacturing Output Change with Economic Development?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 17(1), pages 109-123, September.
    20. M A Cole & R J R Elliott & K Shimamoto, 2003. "US Specialization in Pollution-Intensive Industries: Factor Intensities versus Environmental Regulations," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0321, Economics, The University of Manchester.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:2:y:2023:i:4:s2949753123000541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/innovation-and-green-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.