IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v23y2016icp28-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How measurement framing and accounting information system evaluation mode influence environmental performance judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Alewine, Hank C.
  • Allport, Christopher D.
  • Shen, Wei-Cheng Milton

Abstract

How does information presentation within an accounting information system (AIS) influence environmental performance judgments? Decision makers generally analyze alternatives' performances in one of two evaluation modes: jointly or separately. Joint mode provides greater measure evaluability because of available comparisons between alternates. Thus, additional information garners greater decision weight in separate mode, where less contextual information exists. However, many environmental decision settings use separate evaluation mode because of no viable alternatives (e.g., large pollution abatement investments). In this setting, General Evaluability Theory (GET; Hsee and Zhang, 2010) suggests low measurement evaluability when low measurement knowledge and non-inherently understood measures exist—both common characteristics in environmental settings. This study introduces attribute framing to the GET framework as important to consider when analyzing environmental decision differences across modes, because frames are often a necessary component of information presentation and different descriptions often lead to different decisions (Dunegan, 1993). Experimental participants (n=206) evaluated factory environmental performances with joint/separate mode and positive/negative attribute framing. Findings inform AIS designers as results suggest evaluation mode moderates the presentation of attribute frames on decisions. Specifically, higher (lower) evaluations occur when using positive (negative) framing, and this effect is more (less) pronounced in separate (joint) mode. Findings also suggest that more consistent judgments occur across evaluation mode with positive compared to negative framing of performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Alewine, Hank C. & Allport, Christopher D. & Shen, Wei-Cheng Milton, 2016. "How measurement framing and accounting information system evaluation mode influence environmental performance judgments," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:23:y:2016:i:c:p:28-44
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2016.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089515300555
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    2. Sanjaya Kuruppu & Markus J. Milne, 2010. "Dolphin deaths, organizational legitimacy and potential employees’ reactions to assured environmental disclosures," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Granlund, Markus, 2011. "Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: A research note," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 3-19.
    4. Kuruppu, Sanjaya & Milne, Markus J., 2010. "Dolphin deaths, organizational legitimacy and potential employees’ reactions to assured environmental disclosures," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19.
    5. Mălăescu, Irina & Sutton, Steve G., 2015. "The effects of decision aid structural restrictiveness on cognitive load, perceived usefulness, and reuse intentions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 16-36.
    6. Hank C. Alewine & Dan N. Stone, 2016. "The Joint Influence of Evaluation Mode and Benchmark Signal on Environmental Accounting-Relevant Decisions," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 124-152, May.
    7. Dillard, Jesse, 2008. "Responding to expanding accountability regimes by re-presenting organizational context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 21-42.
    8. Kuhberger, Anton, 1995. "The Framing of Decisions: A New Look at Old Problems," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 230-240, May.
    9. Kaminski, Jacek, 2003. "Technologies and costs of SO2-emissions reduction for the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(3-4), pages 165-172, July.
    10. Levin, Irwin P & Gaeth, Gary J, 1988. "How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 374-378, December.
    11. Catherine W. M. Yeung & Dilip Soman, 2007. "The Duration Heuristic," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(3), pages 315-326, July.
    12. Kogut, Tehila & Ritov, Ilana, 2005. "The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 106-116, July.
    13. Herbohn, Kathleen, 2005. "A full cost environmental accounting experiment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 519-536, August.
    14. Brockner, Joel & Wiesenfeld, Batia M. & Martin, Christopher L., 1995. "Decision Frame, Procedural Justice, and Survivors' Reactions to Job Layoffs," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 59-68, July.
    15. Hsee, Christopher K & Leclerc, France, 1998. "Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 175-186, September.
    16. Alessandro Marelli, 2015. "The evolving role of environmental management accounting in internal decision-making: a research note," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 14-47.
    17. Schweitzer, Maurice, 1995. "Multiple Reference Points, Framing, and the Status Quo Bias in Health Care Financing Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 69-72, July.
    18. Claus Holm & Pall Rikhardsson, 2008. "Experienced and Novice Investors: Does Environmental Information Influence Investment Allocation Decisions?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 537-557.
    19. Libby, Robert & Bloomfield, Robert & Nelson, Mark W., 2002. "Experimental research in financial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 775-810, November.
    20. Benston, George J., 2006. "Fair-value accounting: A cautionary tale from Enron," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 465-484.
    21. Christopher K. Hsee & Jiao Zhang & Liangyan Wang & Shirley Zhang, 2013. "Magnitude, Time, and Risk Differ Similarly between Joint and Single Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(1), pages 172-184.
    22. Schaltegger, Stefan & Burritt, Roger L., 2010. "Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 375-384, October.
    23. Stone, Dan N. & Schkade, David A., 1994. "Effects of Attribute Scales on Process and Performance in Multiattribute Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 261-287, August.
    24. Sullivan, Kathryn & Kida, Thomas, 1995. "The Effect of Multiple Reference Points and Prior Gains and Losses on Managers' Risky Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 76-83, October.
    25. Levin, Irwin P. & Schneider, Sandra L. & Gaeth, Gary J., 1998. "All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 149-188, November.
    26. Graeme Wines & Ron Dagwell & Carolyn Windsor, 2007. "Implications of the IFRS goodwill accounting treatment," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(9), pages 862-880, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Rajeev Dwivedi & Ronaldo Gomes Dultra-de-Lima & Claudio Parisi & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2023. "Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 199-218, June.
    2. Haitham Mohsin Kareem & Mohammed Dauwed & Ahmed Meri & Mu’taman Jarrar & Mohammad Al-Bsheish & Ali Abdulameer Aldujaili, 2021. "The Role of Accounting Information System and Knowledge Management to Enhancing Organizational Performance in Iraqi SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Xia, Dan & Wang, Xiang-Qian, 2021. "The synergetic impact of environmental and innovation information disclosure on corporate financial performance: An empirical study based on China coal listed companies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne & Pisaniello, John & Buss, Peter & Mayer, Wolfgang, 2021. "The importance of accounting-integrated information systems for realising productivity and sustainability in the agricultural sector," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    5. Ahmad Issa Farhan & Mohammad Naser Mousa Hamdan, 2017. "Evaluating performance of accounting information systems using a fuzzy logic approach," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 5207431, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freling, Traci H. & Vincent, Leslie H. & Henard, David H., 2014. "When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 95-109.
    2. Eyal Gamliel & Eyal Peer, 2010. "Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 5(1), pages 11-20, February.
    3. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Carter, Patrick & Blair, Edward, 2001. "Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 382-399, July.
    4. Abdifatah Ahmed Haji & Paul Coram & Indrit Troshani, 2021. "Effects of integrating CSR information in financial reports on investors’ firm value estimates," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3605-3647, June.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:11-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Carolin Baier & Max Göttsche & Andreas Hellmann & Frank Schiemann, 2022. "Too Good To Be True: Influencing Credibility Perceptions with Signaling Reference Explicitness and Assurance Depth," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 695-714, July.
    7. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    8. Jain, Gaurav & Gaeth, Gary J. & Nayakankuppam, Dhananjay & Levin, Irwin P., 2020. "Revisiting attribute framing: The impact of number roundedness on framing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 109-119.
    9. Mao, Wen, 2016. "Sometimes “Fee” Is Better Than “Free”: Token Promotional Pricing and Consumer Reactions to Price Promotion Offering Product Upgrades," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 173-184.
    10. Van de Velde, Liesbeth & Verbeke, Wim & Popp, Michael & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2010. "The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5541-5549, October.
    11. Yang Li & Dandan Yang & Yingying Liu, 2021. "The Effect of Message Framing on Consumers’ Intentions to Purchase Recycling-Aiding Products in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Idris Adjerid & Alessandro Acquisti & George Loewenstein, 2019. "Choice Architecture, Framing, and Cascaded Privacy Choices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2267-2290, May.
    13. Katharina Dowling & Daniel Guhl & Daniel Klapper & Martin Spann & Lucas Stich & Narine Yegoryan, 2020. "Behavioral biases in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 449-477, May.
    14. Sobia Jamil & Syed Imran Zaman & Yasanur Kayikci & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan, 2023. "The Role of Green Recruitment on Organizational Sustainability Performance: A Study within the Context of Green Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-31, November.
    15. Wong, Kin Fai Ellick & Kwong, Jessica Y.Y., 2005. "Comparing two tiny giants or two huge dwarfs? Preference reversals owing to number size framing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 54-65, September.
    16. Santana, Shelle & Thomas, Manoj & Morwitz, Vicki G., 2020. "The Role of Numbers in the Customer Journey," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 138-154.
    17. Danijela Vuletic, 2015. "How Effective are Reminders and Frames in Incentivizing Blood Donations," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp554, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    18. Eyal Gamliel & Hamutal Kreiner, 2013. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? The interaction of visual display and attribute representation in attenuating framing bias}," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(4), pages 482-491, July.
    19. Maria Misiuda & Maik Lachmann, 2022. "Investors’ Perceptions of Sustainability Reporting—A Review of the Experimental Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Yi-Fen Chen & Shi-Han Chang, 2016. "The online framing effect: the moderating role of warning, brand familiarity, and product type," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 355-374, September.
    21. Jieun Chung & Charles H. Cho, 2018. "Current Trends within Social and Environmental Accounting Research: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 207-239, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:23:y:2016:i:c:p:28-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.