IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v34y2010i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dolphin deaths, organizational legitimacy and potential employees’ reactions to assured environmental disclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjaya Kuruppu
  • Markus J. Milne

Abstract

The present study draws from and extends experimental design frameworks used by Chan and Milne (1999) and Milne and Patten (2002). It extends this work using external negative news media contrasted with (positive) corporate environmental report disclosures, by focusing on respondents’ potential employment decisions and their perceptions of organizational reputation/legitimacy, and by examining the impact of assurance in these relationships. In addition, the study probes the veracity of business claims that disclosures and their assurance can build a business case for stakeholder communication. These are set and examined within a context of commercial fishing practices and the consequent deaths of rare dolphins.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjaya Kuruppu & Markus J. Milne, 2010. "Dolphin deaths, organizational legitimacy and potential employees’ reactions to assured environmental disclosures," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:1-19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2009.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.12.001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdifatah Ahmed Haji & Paul Coram & Indrit Troshani, 2021. "Effects of integrating CSR information in financial reports on investors’ firm value estimates," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3605-3647, June.
    2. Lei Wang & Brad Tuttle, 2014. "Using corporate social responsibility performance to evaluate financial disclosure credibility," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 523-544, October.
    3. Abeer Hassan & Essam Ibrahim, 2012. "Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Factors Influencing Companies' Success in Attaining Environmental Awards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 32-46, January.
    4. Jieun Chung & Charles H. Cho, 2018. "Current Trends within Social and Environmental Accounting Research: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 207-239, June.
    5. Sobia Jamil & Syed Imran Zaman & Yasanur Kayikci & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan, 2023. "The Role of Green Recruitment on Organizational Sustainability Performance: A Study within the Context of Green Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-31, November.
    6. Quick, Reiner & Gauch, Kevin, 2021. "Is assurance on risk management systems relevant for bankers’ decisions?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    8. Alewine, Hank C. & Allport, Christopher D. & Shen, Wei-Cheng Milton, 2016. "How measurement framing and accounting information system evaluation mode influence environmental performance judgments," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-44.
    9. Carolin Baier & Max Göttsche & Andreas Hellmann & Frank Schiemann, 2022. "Too Good To Be True: Influencing Credibility Perceptions with Signaling Reference Explicitness and Assurance Depth," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 695-714, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.