IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v74y2025ics1544612325000133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financing sustainable entrepreneurship: Unpacking the role of campaign information and risk disclosure in reward-based crowdfunding

Author

Listed:
  • Hopp, Christian
  • Dey, Pascal
  • Riniker, Maria
  • Rüdiger, Matthias

Abstract

Understanding how the descriptions of crowdfunding campaigns, and particularly the information on risks, affect the campaign success of sustainable enterprises remains a critical gap in the literature on entrepreneurial crowdfunding. This study analyzes how campaign information and risk disclosure affect the campaign success of sustainable enterprises. Using a dataset comprising 98,528 crowdfunding campaigns on Kickstarter, which introduced a dedicated section on ‘risks and challenges’ in 2012, we find that the crowdfunding campaigns of sustainable entrepreneurs are generally less successful than those of conventional ventures, and that they particularly struggle to grow the number of backers. Moreover, our results indicate that the success rates of sustainable and conventional campaigns are differentially influenced by the comprehensiveness of campaign information and risk disclosure. Our post-hoc explanations suggest that the positive, trust-building effects of sustainable entrepreneurs’ risk disclosure outweigh the negative, dissuasive effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Hopp, Christian & Dey, Pascal & Riniker, Maria & Rüdiger, Matthias, 2025. "Financing sustainable entrepreneurship: Unpacking the role of campaign information and risk disclosure in reward-based crowdfunding," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:74:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325000133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.106748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325000133
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.106748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wessel, Michael & Thies, Ferdinand & Benlian, Alexander, 2022. "The role of prototype fidelity in technology crowdfunding," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132588, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Lagazio, Corrado & Querci, Francesca, 2018. "Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 318-324.
    3. Aaron H. Anglin & Shane W. Reid & Jeremy C. Short, 2023. "More Than One Way to Tell a Story: A Configurational Approach to Storytelling in Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 461-494, March.
    4. Parhankangas, Annaleena & Renko, Maija, 2017. "Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 215-236.
    5. Rotem Shneor, 2020. "Crowdfunding Models, Strategies, and Choices Between Them," Springer Books, in: Rotem Shneor & Liang Zhao & Bjørn-Tore Flåten (ed.), Advances in Crowdfunding, edition 1, chapter 2, pages 21-42, Springer.
    6. Patrick Royston & Willi Sauerbrei, 2007. "Multivariable modeling with cubic regression splines: A principled approach," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(1), pages 45-70, February.
    7. Rose, Stefan & Wentzel, Daniel & Hopp, Christian & Kaminski, Jermain, 2021. "Launching for success: The effects of psychological distance and mental simulation on funding decisions and crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    8. Weerawardena, Jay & Mort, Gillian Sullivan, 2006. "Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 21-35, February.
    9. Fisher, Greg & Kuratko, Donald F. & Bloodgood, James M. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 52-71.
    10. Alexa Böckel & Jacob Hörisch & Isabell Tenner, 2021. "A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: highlighting what really matters," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 433-453, April.
    11. Christian Soltmann & Tobias Stucki & Martin Woerter, 2015. "The Impact of Environmentally Friendly Innovations on Value Added," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(3), pages 457-479, November.
    12. Moss, Todd W. & Renko, Maija & Block, Emily & Meyskens, Moriah, 2018. "Funding the story of hybrid ventures: Crowdfunder lending preferences and linguistic hybridity," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 643-659.
    13. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    14. David Barberá-Tomás & Itziar Castelló & Frank de Bakker & Charlene Zietsma, 2019. "Energizing through Visuals: How Social Entrepreneurs Use Emotion-Symbolic Work for Social Change," Post-Print hal-02511088, HAL.
    15. Keongtae Kim & Jooyoung Park & Yang Pan & Kunpeng Zhang & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2022. "Risk Disclosure in Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1023-1041, September.
    16. Christian Hopp & Stefan Rose & Jermain Kaminski, 2022. "The Pervasive Role of Campaign and Product-Related Uncertainties in Inhibiting Crowdfunding Success," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Bade, Marco & Reichenbach, Felix, 2025. "Which sustainable development goals favor crowdfunding success?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Meoli, Michele & Vismara, Silvio, 2021. "Information manipulation in equity crowdfunding markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Wehnert, Peter & Baccarella, Christian V. & Beckmann, Markus, 2019. "In crowdfunding we trust? Investigating crowdfunding success as a signal for enhancing trust in sustainable product features," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 128-137.
    20. Lingfei Deng & Qiang Ye & DaPeng Xu & Wenjun Sun & Guangxin Jiang, 2022. "A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-70, December.
    21. Anglin, Aaron H. & Pidduck, Robert J., 2022. "Choose your words carefully: Harnessing the language of crowdfunding for success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 43-58.
    22. Bonaparte, Yosef & Kumar, Naman, 2024. "Does entrepreneurship really reduce income inequality?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    23. Hoogendoorn, B. & van der Zwan, P.W. & Thurik, A.R., 2011. "Social Entrepreneurship and Performance: The Role of Perceived Barriers and Risk," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2011-016-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    24. Wessel, Michael & Thies, Ferdinand & Benlian, Alexander, 2022. "The role of prototype fidelity in technology crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bade, Marco & Reichenbach, Felix, 2025. "Which sustainable development goals favor crowdfunding success?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Chandler, Jeffrey A. & Anglin, Aaron H. & Kanwal, Fizza & Short, Jeremy C., 2024. "No politics in funding pitches: An expectancy violations theory perspective of entrepreneurs' political expressions in crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    3. Aaron H. Anglin & Shane W. Reid & Jeremy C. Short, 2023. "More Than One Way to Tell a Story: A Configurational Approach to Storytelling in Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 461-494, March.
    4. Krukowski, Kipp A. & Pollack, Jeffrey M. & Rutherford, Matthew W., 2023. "Winning the opportunity to pitch: Piquing startup investors’ interest by sending the right signals in executive summaries," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 75-86.
    5. Felix Pinkow, 2025. "Determinants of overfunding in reward-based crowdfunding," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 155-192, February.
    6. Saurav Chandra Talukder & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Exploring the Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship and Crowdfunding: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Sirine Zribi, 2022. "Effects of social influence on crowdfunding performance: implications of the covid-19 pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Jiao, Hao & Wang, Lindong & Yang, Jifeng, 2023. "Standing head and shoulders above others? Complementor experience-based design and crowdfunding success on digital platforms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Maiolini, Riccardo & Cappa, Francesco & Franco, Stefano & Quaratino, Giovanni Raimondo, 2024. "The impact of sustainable development goals in lending-based prosocial crowdfunding: A topic modeling analysis on the kiva platform," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    10. Sven Siebeneicher & Ilker Yenice & Carolin Bock, 2022. "Financial-Return Crowdfunding for Energy and Sustainability in the German-Speaking Realm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Cai, Wanxiang & Polzin, Friedemann & Stam, Erik, 2021. "Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Waddingham, Jacob A. & Chandler, Jeffrey A. & Alexander, Katherine C. & Zafar, Sana & Anglin, Aaron, 2025. "The leisure paradox for entrepreneurs: A neo-institutional theory perspective of disclosing leisure activities in crowdfunding pitches," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2).
    13. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    14. Yu, Honglan & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Zhang, Yameng & Adams, Kweku & Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana, 2025. "Home–country technological legitimacy in crowdfunding: The moderating role of positive psychological capital language," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Zhu, Zujun & Huang, Qian & Liu, Hefu, 2023. "How heuristic cues impact crowdfunding performance: The moderating role of platform competition intensity and platform demand potential," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Ye Liu & Ke Zhang & Weili Xue & Ziyu Zhou, 2024. "Crowdfunding innovative but risky new ventures: the importance of less ambiguous tone," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-43, December.
    17. Sitruk, Jonathan & Grodal, Stine & Suarez, Fernando & Dibiaggio, Ludovic, 2025. "Emotional brightness and crowdfunding performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    18. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Abu Bashar & Iqbal Thonse Hawaldar & Muneer Shaik & Mohammed Selim, 2022. "What Do We Know about Crowdfunding and P2P Lending Research? A Bibliometric Review and Meta-Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Aaron H. Anglin & Hana Milanov & Jeremy C. Short, 2023. "Religious Expression and Crowdfunded Microfinance Success: Insights from Role Congruity Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 397-426, June.
    20. Constantin von Selasinsky & Eva Lutz, 2021. "The Effects of Pro-Social and Pro-Environmental Orientation on Crowdfunding Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:74:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325000133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.