IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v196y2025ics0301421524004282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green on demand? Offtaker preferences for corporate power purchase agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Mili, Sabrina
  • Côté, Elizabeth

Abstract

Corporate power purchase agreements (CPPAs) have emerged as an additional instrument for accelerating renewable energy deployment. By facilitating the financing of projects, CPPAs offer numerous benefits to power producers and corporate offtakers. However, despite their growing popularity, risk allocation among these counterparties remains challenging. This study investigates risk perceptions and preferences for CPPA design based on insights from 91 corporate offtakers who made 860 hypothetical green-power-procurement decisions in the Swiss context. Our results show a strong interest in CPPAs with lower prices and shorter tenors. The latter is especially important for SMEs, who would be willing to pay considerably more for a five-year contract than a longer one. While large companies would pay hefty premiums for local power production, SMEs impute more importance to the type of technology. However, long-term commitments and the complexity of contractual obligations are major drawbacks. While our findings show that CPPAs have the potential to play an important role in complementing public support for renewables, they also point to the need to implement framework conditions that contribute to lowering risks and complexity for counterparties. Further, they highlight distinctive preferences within this consumer segment, which could inform CPPA negotiations and foster mutually beneficial agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Mili, Sabrina & Côté, Elizabeth, 2025. "Green on demand? Offtaker preferences for corporate power purchase agreements," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524004282
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524004282
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524004282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.