IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v102y2017icp237-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Status of Electricity Act, 2003: A systematic review of literature

Author

Listed:
  • Mukherjee, Shilpi
  • Dhingra, Tarun
  • Sengupta, Anirban

Abstract

The Electricity Act 2003 was a landmark Act which promised to remove the maladies which afflict the Indian Power Sector and that too at a time when the sector was ridden with problems. With concepts such as open access, multiple distribution licensees, wheeling of electricity etc, the said Act intended to encourage competition which in turn was meant bring a paradigm shift in the sector. The paper undertakes a systematic literature review to find the status of review of the promising Act. More than a decade has passed since its enactment and amendments are due with the legislative body of India but none of the literature reviewed gives a comprehensive view encompassing all the objectives of the Act. Moreover, these documents study either the probable impact or the impact on a particular segment only. It has important implications for the Power sector which highlights a significant gap in literature and provides a basis on which future research can be built upon.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukherjee, Shilpi & Dhingra, Tarun & Sengupta, Anirban, 2017. "Status of Electricity Act, 2003: A systematic review of literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 237-248.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:237-248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516306565
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shukla, Umesh Kumar & Thampy, Ashok, 2011. "Analysis of competition and market power in the wholesale electricity market in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2699-2710, May.
    2. -, 2016. "Monitoring energy efficiency in Latin America," Documentos de Proyectos 709, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. ., 2016. "Electric energy utilities," Chapters,in: Public Utilities, Second Edition, chapter 4, pages 69-88 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. repec:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:3:p:125:d:64325 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sharma, K. & Kim, Y.-H. & Yiacoumi, S. & Gabitto, J. & Bilheux, H.Z. & Santodonato, L.J. & Mayes, R.T. & Dai, S. & Tsouris, C., 2016. "Analysis and simulation of a blue energy cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 249-260.
    6. Sharma, D. Parameswara & Nair, P. S. Chandramohanan & Balasubramanian, R., 2005. "Performance of Indian power sector during a decade under restructuring: a critique," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 563-576, March.
    7. Singh, Randhir & Sood, Yog Raj, 2011. "Current status and analysis of renewable promotional policies in Indian restructured power sector--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 657-664, January.
    8. Singh, Anoop, 2006. "Power sector reform in India: current issues and prospects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(16), pages 2480-2490, November.
    9. Thakur, Tripta & Deshmukh, S. G. & Kaushik, S. C. & Kulshrestha, Mukul, 2005. "Impact assessment of the Electricity Act 2003 on the Indian power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1187-1198, June.
    10. Reineberg, Hubert H., 2006. "India's Electricity Sector in Transition: Can Its Giant Goals Be Met?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 77-84.
    11. Laia, R. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Melíco, R. & Mendes, V.M.F., 2016. "Bidding strategy of wind-thermal energy producers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 673-681.
    12. Singh, Anoop, 2010. "Towards a competitive market for electricity and consumer choice in the Indian power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4196-4208, August.
    13. Jako Jellema & Henk A. J. Mulder, 2016. "Public Engagement in Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, February.
    14. repec:ags:ingacp:253272 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. repec:ags:ingacp:253270 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Joseph, Kelli L., 2010. "The politics of power: Electricity reform in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 503-511, January.
    17. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2006. "Electricity market reform: What has the experience taught us thus far?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 63-75, June.
    18. AfDB AfDB, . "Annual Report 2012," Annual Report, African Development Bank, number 461.
    19. De Meij, A. & Vinuesa, J.-F. & Maupas, V. & Waddle, J. & Price, I. & Yaseen, B. & Ismail, A., 2016. "Wind energy resource mapping of Palestine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 551-562.
    20. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2006. "Electricity Market Reform: What Have We Learned? What Have We Gained?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(9), pages 70-83, November.
    21. Sharma, Naveen Kumar & Tiwari, Prashant Kumar & Sood, Yog Raj, 2013. "A comprehensive analysis of strategies, policies and development of hydropower in India: Special emphasis on small hydro power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 460-470.
    22. repec:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:3:p:-:d:64325 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. WorldFish, 2013. "Annual report 2012/13," Working Papers, The WorldFish Center, number 40306, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:237-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.