IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eejocm/v25y2017icp50-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling joint evacuation decisions in social networks: The case of Hurricane Sandy

Author

Listed:
  • Sadri, Arif Mohaimin
  • Ukkusuri, Satish V.
  • Gladwin, Hugh

Abstract

Coastal areas of the United States are vulnerable to substantial loss of lives and property damage from repeatedly occurring hurricanes and evacuation is the usual recourse to prevent loss of life when high storm surge threatens. The fundamental question in evacuation modeling is to explore the complex evacuation decision-making process leading to an individual’s decision to evacuate or not during a hurricane threat. Recent studies suggest that the social network characteristics of individuals could potentially determine overall evacuation patterns. This study explores the joint evacuation decisions of individuals in personal networks by using ego-centric social network data obtained from Hurricane Sandy and by considering the nested structure of the ego-centric network data, i.e. close contacts (alters) as nested within an individual (ego). In this regard, the study develops a multinomial multilevel model of joint evacuation decisions at the dyadic (ego-alter tie) level utilizing a Hierarchical Generalized Linear Modeling (HGLM) approach. Model estimation results suggest factors that define a social tie (contact frequency, discussion topic and geographic proximity) significantly influence the evacuation decisions between individuals and their social partners. In addition, individuals’ (both ego and alter) own socio-demographics such as age, marital status, previous evacuation experience, evacuation order, household’s type, size, location and proximity to a water body also affect the decision to evacuate. These findings are useful to help emergency managers implement efficient evacuation strategies and to facilitate planning by policymakers by determining fractions of people evacuating or not for a major hurricane within the context of their social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadri, Arif Mohaimin & Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Gladwin, Hugh, 2017. "Modeling joint evacuation decisions in social networks: The case of Hurricane Sandy," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 50-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:25:y:2017:i:c:p:50-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2017.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534517300313
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jocm.2017.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hasan, Samiul & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2011. "A threshold model of social contagion process for evacuation decision making," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1590-1605.
    2. Michael Lindell & Carla Prater, 2007. "A hurricane evacuation management decision support system (EMDSS)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 40(3), pages 627-634, March.
    3. John C. Whitehead & Bob Edwards & Marieke Van Willigen & John R. Maiolo & Kenneth Wilson & Kevin T. Smith, 2000. "“Heading for Higher Ground: Factors Affecting Real and Hypothetical Hurricane Evacuation Behavior,”," Working Papers 0006, East Carolina University, Department of Economics.
    4. Sherwin, Henrietta & Chatterjee, Kiron & Jain, Juliet, 2014. "An exploration of the importance of social influence in the decision to start bicycling in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 32-45.
    5. Stephen P. Borgatti & Daniel S. Halgin, 2011. "On Network Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1168-1181, October.
    6. Urbina, Elba & Wolshon, Brian, 2003. "National review of hurricane evacuation plans and policies: a comparison and contrast of state practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 257-275, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Greta Amorsen & Jacki Schirmer & Mel R Mylek & Theo Niyonsenga & Douglas Paton & Petra Buergelt & Kimberly Brown, 2025. "The Impact of Different Types of Social Resources on Coping Self-Efficacy and Distress During Australia’s Black Summer Bushfires," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Wong, Stephen D & Yu, Mengqiao & Kuncheria, Anu & Shaheen, Susan A & Walker, Joan L, 2022. "Willingness of Hurricane Irma evacuees to share resources: a multi-modeling approach," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt70g3c3nk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Arif Mohaimin Sadri & Satish V. Ukkusuri & Seungyoon Lee & Rosalee Clawson & Daniel Aldrich & Megan Sapp Nelson & Justin Seipel & Daniel Kelly, 2018. "The role of social capital, personal networks, and emergency responders in post-disaster recovery and resilience: a study of rural communities in Indiana," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(3), pages 1377-1406, February.
    4. Hector R. Lim & Ma. Bernadeth B. Lim & Ann Wendy M. Rojas, 2022. "Towards modelling of evacuation behavior and planning for emergency logistics due to the Philippine Taal Volcanic eruption in 2020," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 553-581, October.
    5. Xue Jin & U. Rashid Sumaila & Kedong Yin, 2020. "Direct and Indirect Loss Evaluation of Storm Surge Disaster Based on Static and Dynamic Input-Output Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Calastri, Chiara & Hess, Stephane & Daly, Andrew & Carrasco, Juan Antonio & Choudhury, Charisma, 2018. "Modelling the loss and retention of contacts in social networks: The role of dyad-level heterogeneity and tie strength," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 63-77.
    7. Alam, MD Jahedul & Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul, 2024. "A mass evacuation modeling framework to account for vulnerabilities in staged evacuation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay & Bekir Bartin, 2015. "Effects of Hurricanes Irene and Sandy in New Jersey: traffic patterns and highway disruptions during evacuations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 2081-2107, September.
    2. David S. Dixon & Pallab Mozumder & William F. Vásquez & Hugh Gladwin, 2017. "Heterogeneity Within and Across Households in Hurricane Evacuation Response," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 645-680, June.
    3. Takahiro Yabe & P. Suresh C. Rao & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2021. "Modeling the Influence of Online Social Media Information on Post-Disaster Mobility Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Stephen D. Wong & Joan L. Walker & Susan A. Shaheen, 0. "Bridging the gap between evacuations and the sharing economy," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-50.
    5. Downward, Paul & Rasciute, Simona, 2015. "Assessing the impact of the National Cycle Network and physical activity lifestyle on cycling behaviour in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 425-437.
    6. Mikaela Backman & Charlie Karlsson, 2016. "Determinants of self-employment among commuters and non-commuters," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 755-774, November.
    7. de Oliveira Maciel, Cristiano & Netto, Raul Zanon Rocha, 2020. "Architectural agency in intra-organizational networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 489-497.
    8. Muhamed Kudic & Wilfried Ehrenfeld & Toralf Pusch, 2015. "On the trail of core–periphery patterns in innovation networks: measurements and new empirical findings from the German laser industry," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(1), pages 187-220, October.
    9. Eva D. Regnier, 2020. "What Is Six Hours Worth? The Impact of Lead Time on Tropical-Storm Preparation Decisions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 9-23, March.
    10. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2016. "An indirect latent informational conformity social influence choice model: Formulation and case study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 75-101.
    11. Hemant Gehlot & Arif M. Sadri & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2019. "Joint modeling of evacuation departure and travel times in hurricanes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2419-2440, December.
    12. Miguel Esteban & Jeremy Bricker & Ricardo San Carlos Arce & Hiroshi Takagi & NamYi Yun & Warathida Chaiyapa & Alexander Sjoegren & Tomoya Shibayama, 2018. "Tsunami awareness: a comparative assessment between Japan and the USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1507-1528, September.
    13. Riccaboni, Massimo & Wang, Xu & Zhu, Zhen, 2021. "Firm performance in networks: The interplay between firm centrality and corporate group size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 641-653.
    14. Hiranya Sritart & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Sakiko Kanbara & Takashi Hara, 2020. "Methodology and Application of Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Evacuation Shelters in Disaster Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Yiling Deng & Pengjun Zhao, 2023. "The determinants of shared bike use in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Sean Yim & Brett Josephson & Jean Johnson & Sanjay Sisodiya, 2015. "Interfirm Relational Strategies and Innovation: the Role of Interfirm Relational Traits and Firm Resources," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(3), pages 230-244, September.
    17. Dayanandan, Ajit & Donker, Han & Nofsinger, John, 2019. "The role of caste for board membership, CEO, and interlocking," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 29-41.
    18. Pedersen, Torben & Soda, Giuseppe & Stea, Diego, 2019. "Globally networked: Intraorganizational boundary spanning in the global organization," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 169-180.
    19. Ma. Bernadeth B. Lim & Hector R. Lim & Mongkut Piantanakulchai & Francis Aldrine Uy, 2016. "A household-level flood evacuation decision model in Quezon City, Philippines," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1539-1561, February.
    20. Ivan Rodrigo Rizzo Dias & George Bedinelli Rossi, 2017. "How far is World Champion from World Class? Institutional effects on a Brazilian non-profit sports organization," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(Special I), pages 24-44, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:25:y:2017:i:c:p:50-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.