Rotation group bias in reporting of household purchases in the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108889
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Ruben L. Bach & Stephanie Eckman, 2019. "Participating in a panel survey changes respondents’ labour market behaviour," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(1), pages 263-281, January.
- Alan B. Krueger & Alexandre Mas & Xiaotong Niu, 2017.
"The Evolution of Rotation Group Bias: Will the Real Unemployment Rate Please Stand Up?,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(2), pages 258-264, May.
- Krueger, Alan B. & Mas, Alexandre & Niu, Xiaotong, 2014. "The Evolution of Rotation Group Bias: Will the Real Unemployment Rate Please Stand Up?," IZA Discussion Papers 8512, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Alan B. Krueger & Alexandre Mas & Xiaotong Niu, 2014. "The Evolution of Rotation Group Bias: Will the Real Unemployment Rate Please Stand Up?," Working Papers 578, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
- Alan Krueger & Alexandre Mas & Xiaotong Niu, 2014. "The Evolution of Rotation Group Bias: Will the Real Unemployment Rate Please Stand Up?," NBER Working Papers 20396, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hirsch, Barry T. & Winters, John V., 2016.
"Rotation group bias in measures of multiple job holding,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 160-163.
- Hirsch, Barry & Winters, John V., 2016. "Rotation Group Bias in Measures of Multiple Job Holding," IZA Discussion Papers 10245, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Andrew Halpern-Manners & John Warren, 2012. "Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Studies: Evidence From Labor Force Items in the Current Population Survey," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1499-1519, November.
More about this item
Keywords
Consumer expenditure; Rotation group bias; Misreports; U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey;JEL classification:
- C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
- D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:187:y:2020:i:c:s0165176519304483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.