IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp1077-1092.html

Artificial intelligence and the historical performance expectation gap: Evidence from the moderating role of monetary easing

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zheng
  • Liu, Hongchao

Abstract

This study examines whether and how artificial intelligence engagement affects firms’ deviations from historically expected performance. Using data from non-financial A-share listed firms in China, this study constructs a firm-level indicator of AI engagement based on annual report text and empirically examines its impact on the historical performance expectation gap. The analysis further investigates the underlying transmission channels and the moderating role of the macro policy environment. The results show that higher AI engagement is associated with smaller deviations from historical performance expectations, suggesting that AI enhances firms’ ability to manage expectations and align outcomes with historical benchmarks. Mechanism analysis reveals that this effect operates indirectly through improvements in both supply chain stability and top management team consistency, highlighting the dual governance value of AI across internal and external dimensions. Moreover, the moderating effect analysis finds that the role of AI becomes more pronounced under accommodative monetary policy conditions, indicating that supportive policy environments amplify the effectiveness of AI-based governance. This study contributes to the literature by offering a micro-level governance perspective on the economic consequences of AI, and provides empirical insight into the dynamic interaction between technological integration, expectation management, and institutional conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zheng & Liu, Hongchao, 2026. "Artificial intelligence and the historical performance expectation gap: Evidence from the moderating role of monetary easing," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1077-1092.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:1077-1092
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626000032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:1077-1092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.