IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v92y2025ics1043951x25000793.html

Wealth-based common prosperity and household CO2: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Qin, Xiaodi
  • Sun, Huichun
  • Wu, Haitao

Abstract

Can China's pursuit of common prosperity reduce household carbon emissions (HCEs) through equitable wealth growth and distribution? Using panel data from China Family Panel Studies (2014–2018), merged with sectoral emission intensities from Carbon Emission Account & Datasets and Input-Output Tables, we investigate the causal impact of wealth-based common prosperity on consumption-based HCEs. We measure common prosperity through Sen's welfare function and employ instrumental variable estimation to address endogeneity concerns. Our findings reveal that wealth-based common prosperity significantly reduces HCEs through three channels: enhanced environmental consciousness, accelerated clean energy adoption, and reduced conspicuous consumption. Importantly, these effects are more pronounced among middle-and-higher income households and in regions with greater government expenditure. These results provide empirical support for policy complementarity between wealth growth, distribution and carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin, Xiaodi & Sun, Huichun & Wu, Haitao, 2025. "Wealth-based common prosperity and household CO2: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000793
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000793
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan, Guanghua & Wang, Chen & Wang, Jinxian & Zhang, Xun, 2022. "The income inequality-CO2 emissions nexus: Transmission mechanisms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Arik Levinson & James O’Brien, 2019. "Environmental Engel Curves: Indirect Emissions of Common Air Pollutants," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(1), pages 121-133, March.
    3. Sarsons, Heather, 2015. "Rainfall and conflict: A cautionary tale," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 62-72.
    4. Zhifu Mi & Jiali Zheng & Jing Meng & Jiamin Ou & Klaus Hubacek & Zhu Liu & D’Maris Coffman & Nicholas Stern & Sai Liang & Yi-Ming Wei, 2020. "Economic development and converging household carbon footprints in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 529-537, July.
    5. Oliver Stoner & Jessica Lewis & Itzel Lucio Martínez & Sophie Gumy & Theo Economou & Heather Adair-Rohani, 2021. "Household cooking fuel estimates at global and country level for 1990 to 2030," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Iosifidi, Maria, 2016. "Environmental awareness, consumption, and labor supply: Empirical evidence from household survey data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Golley, Jane & Meng, Xin, 2012. "Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Chinese urban households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1864-1872.
    8. Shu Zhang & Wenying Chen, 2022. "Assessing the energy transition in China towards carbon neutrality with a probabilistic framework," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Zhao, Mengxue & Chan, Hon S., 2024. "Balancing through agglomeration: A third path to sustainable development between common prosperity and carbon neutrality in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    10. Nanak Kakwani & Hyun Hwa Son, 2016. "Social Welfare Functions and Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-58325-3, March.
    11. Kristian S. Nielsen & Kimberly A. Nicholas & Felix Creutzig & Thomas Dietz & Paul C. Stern, 2021. "The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1011-1016, November.
    12. Boyeong Hong & Bartosz J. Bonczak & Arpit Gupta & Constantine E. Kontokosta, 2021. "Measuring inequality in community resilience to natural disasters using large-scale mobility data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Qin, Xiaodi & Wu, Haitao & Li, Rongrong, 2022. "Digital finance and household carbon emissions in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Fan, Wei & Li, Li & Wang, Feiran & Li, Ding, 2020. "Driving factors of CO2 emission inequality in China: The role of government expenditure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Cui, Lixin & Wang, Yonggui & Chen, Weiming & Wen, Wen & Han, Myat Su, 2021. "Predicting determinants of consumers' purchase motivation for electric vehicles: An application of Maslow's hierarchy of needs model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Heran Zheng & Yin Long & Richard Wood & Daniel Moran & Zengkai Zhang & Jing Meng & Kuishuang Feng & Edgar Hertwich & Dabo Guan, 2022. "Ageing society in developed countries challenges carbon mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(3), pages 241-248, March.
    17. Nathan Nunn & Diego Puga, 2012. "Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 20-36, February.
    18. Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2016. "Editor's Choice Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(2), pages 519-578.
    19. Ori Heffetz, 2011. "A Test of Conspicuous Consumption: Visibility and Income Elasticities," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1101-1117, November.
    20. Lucas Chancel & Alex Hough & Tancrède Voituriez, 2018. "Reducing Inequalities within Countries: Assessing the Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(1), pages 5-16, February.
    21. Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky, 2020. "The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 569-577, August.
    22. Zhang, Shaobin & Shi, Baofeng & Ji, Hao, 2023. "How to decouple income growth from household carbon emissions: A perspective based on urban-rural differences in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    23. Kaus, Wolfhard, 2013. "Conspicuous consumption and “race”: Evidence from South Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 63-73.
    24. Shi, Xunpeng & Wang, Keying & Cheong, Tsun Se & Zhang, Hongwu, 2020. "Prioritizing driving factors of household carbon emissions: An application of the LASSO model with survey data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bin Xiong & Baocheng Yu & Yalan Tang, 2025. "Digital Government Construction and Common Prosperity in China: Effect and Transmission Channel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Congyu & Nepal, Rabindra & Zander, Kerstin K., 2025. "Are natural disasters stumbling blocks to carbon inequality mitigation? A global perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Fan, Liwen & Dong, Hongwei & Xiao, Chiwei & Feng, Zhiming & Yan, Jianzhong, 2024. "Energy consumption, structural transformation and related carbon dioxide emissions of rural households on the Tibetan plateau," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    3. Fang Shen & Zibibula Simayi & Shengtian Yang & Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Xiaofen Zhang & Yunyi Zhang, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review of Household Carbon Footprint during 2000–2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Li, Yao, 2025. "How does digital financial inclusion affect households’ CO2? Micro-evidence from an emerging country," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Gao, Xue & Chen, Xuan & Liu, Lan-Cui, 2024. "Exploring the determinants of the evolution of urban and rural household carbon footprints inequality in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Wang, Keying & Cui, Yongyan & Zhang, Hongwu & Shi, Xunpeng & Xue, Jinjun & Yuan, Zhao, 2022. "Household carbon footprints inequality in China: Drivers, components and dynamics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Apeti, Ablam Estel & Bambe, Bao We Wal & Edoh, Eyah Denise & Ly, Alpha, 2025. "Wealth inequality and carbon inequality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Wang, Xueyang & Liu, Wenling & Zhu, Yulin & Xiao, Yuedong & Lv, Yiqun, 2026. "The hidden carbon costs of aging: How household dependency burden shapes emissions in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    9. Zhao, Congyu & Zhai, Xuan & Liu, Zhengguang & Song, Chenchen, 2025. "Enlarging or narrowing? Exploring the impact of energy poverty on carbon inequality in China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Zhao, Yiwen & Yang, Yi, 2026. "Exploring urban household carbon inequality in terms of ecological and economic contributions: Empirical evidence based on nighttime light data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    11. Sergio Da Silva & Raul Matsushita & Vanessa Valcanover & Jessica Campara & Newton Da Costa, 2022. "Losses make choices nonpositional," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-11, November.
    12. Huang, Liqiao & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Li, Yuan & Cheng, Nan & Xue, Jinjun & Long, Yin, 2024. "Sustainable lifestyle: Quantification and determining factors analysis of household carbon footprints in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Lévay, Petra Zsuzsa & Vanhille, Josefine & Goedemé, Tim & Verbist, Gerlinde, 2021. "The association between the carbon footprint and the socio-economic characteristics of Belgian households," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Ang, James B. & Gupta, Satyendra Kumar, 2018. "Agricultural yield and conflict," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 397-417.
    15. Yang, Kaitong & Wu, Jun & Li, Ling & Mi, Zhifu & Yang, Junai & Tang, Ling, 2025. "Impact of household size and structure on carbon emissions in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 9-19.
    16. Lu, Hongwei & Li, Tingting & Li, Guojing & Luo, Qiyou & Gao, Mingjie, 2025. "Digital literacy and the rural cooking energy transition: Evidence from rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Zhao, Mengxue & Yuan, Zhihang & Chan, Hon S., 2023. "Housing wealth and household carbon emissions: The role of homeownership in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    18. Leites, Martín & Rivero, Analía & Salas, Gonzalo, 2024. "The positionality of goods and the positional concern’s origin," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Guillermo Alves & Martín Leites & Gonzalo Salas, 2022. "See it to believe it. Experimental evidence on status good consumption among the youth," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 22-12, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    20. Evangelos V. Dioikitopoulos & Stephen J. Turnovsky & Ronald Wendner, 2020. "Dynamic Status Effects, Savings, And Income Inequality," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(1), pages 351-382, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.