IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v52y2009i2p149-158.html

When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Sims Jr., Henry P.
  • Faraj, Samer
  • Yun, Seokhwa

Abstract

A situational theory of leadership attempts to match a particular leadership style or type to specific external circumstances. The general idea is that one type of leadership will be effective in one situation, but a different type of leadership will be effective in another situation. Historically, situational theories of leadership have been too abstract to apply to specific situations. Nevertheless, the concept of situational leadership retains considerable intuitive appeal. In this article we draw on our previous research about situational leadership during resuscitation in a trauma center, in order to derive a general strategy of how a leader can best develop his or her own personal theory of leadership which best works for their unique circumstances. The core of the strategic approach involves: (1) defining goals for a specific situation, (2) defining potential leadership types, (3) identifying situational conditions, (4) matching a leadership style to the particular situation, and (5) determining how the match between leadership style and situation will be made. The medical trauma center we profile provided an interesting example of how leaders considered elements of the situation to guide their own leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Sims Jr., Henry P. & Faraj, Samer & Yun, Seokhwa, 2009. "When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 149-158.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:52:y:2009:i:2:p:149-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007-6813(08)00162-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samer Faraj & Yan Xiao, 2006. "Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1155-1169, August.
    2. Podsakoff, Philip M. & Bommer, William H. & Podsakoff, Nathan P. & MacKenzie, Scott B., 2006. "Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 113-142, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allen, Mathew R. & Adomdza, Gordon K. & Meyer, Marc H., 2015. "Managing for innovation: Managerial control and employee level outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 371-379.
    2. Smita Mukherjee & Zubin R. Mulla, 2022. "Empowering and Directive Leadership: The Cost of Changing Styles," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 10(2), pages 251-266, May.
    3. Rapp, Adam & Ogilvie, Jessica & Bachrach, Daniel G., 2015. "Sales leadership icons and models: How comic book superheroes would make great sales leaders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 261-274.
    4. Bruning, Patrick F. & Hsin-Chen Lin, & Hsu, Ching-Yi, 2022. "Crafting solutions to leadership demands for well-being and effectiveness," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 603-615.
    5. Ali, Imran & Gligor, David & Balta, Maria & Bozkurt, Siddik & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2024. "From disruption to innovation: The importance of the supply chain leadership style for driving logistics innovation in the face of geopolitical disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Renier Steyn, 2020. "Leadership Styles and Organisational Structure," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 98116-98116, December.
    7. Ali Abdul Hassan Abbas & Hussein Huraja Khali, 2016. "Effect of the Empowerment Leadership's on Job Involvement Reinforcement through a Mediator Role for Strategic Thinking Skills," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(6), pages 189-220, June.
    8. Azio Barani, 2021. "Innovazione tecnologica e lavoro: impatti sui processi di selezione, organizzazione e sviluppo del personale," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(114), pages 129-170.
    9. Steffen H. Schroeder & Urs Baldegger, 2019. "Empowering Leadership In R&D — Moderating Effects Of The Strategic And Cultural Context," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-29, June.
    10. Steven L. Johnson & Hani Safadi & Samer Faraj, 2015. "The Emergence of Online Community Leadership," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 165-187, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Ali Yamin, 2021. "Investigating the Drivers of Supply Chain Resilience in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Linda Argote & Jerry Guo & Ki-Won Haan & Matthew R. Rosengart & Cindy Y. Teng & Jeremy M. Kahn, 2026. "Transactive Memory Systems and Hospital Trauma Team Performance: Shared Experience in Action Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 48-70, January.
    3. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.
    4. Gerald C. Kane & Jeremiah Johnson & Ann Majchrzak, 2014. "Emergent Life Cycle: The Tension Between Knowledge Change and Knowledge Retention in Open Online Coproduction Communities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 3026-3048, December.
    5. Basaglia, Stefano & Caporarello, Leonardo & Magni, Massimo & Pennarola, Ferdinando, 2010. "IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 542-551.
    6. Hald, Julie & Gillespie, Alex & Reader, Tom W., 2025. "Problems in dealing with problems: how breakdowns in corrective culture lead to institutional failure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122814, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Yingchao Lan & Aravind Chandrasekaran & Deepa Goradia & Daniel Walker, 2022. "Collaboration Structures in Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems: An Exploratory Study of Accountable Care Organizations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1796-1820, May.
    8. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Philip Gylfe & Henrika Franck & Curtis Lebaron & Saku Mantere, 2016. "Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 133-148, January.
    9. Grégoire Bollmann & Franciska Krings, 2016. "Workgroup Climates and Employees’ Counterproductive Work Behaviours: A Social-Cognitive Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 184-209, March.
    10. Shafique Ur Rehman & Anam Bhatti & Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry, 2019. "Mediating effect of innovative culture and organizational learning between leadership styles at third-order and organizational performance in Malaysian SMEs," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Catherine Durnell Cramton & Tine Köhler & Raymond E. Levitt, 0. "Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    12. Mehmet KIZILOĞLU & Sabahat BAYRAK KÖK, 2020. "Denison Örgüt Kültürü Modeli Bağlamında Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütsel Güç İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 49(1), pages 60-85, May.
    13. Lord, Robert G. & Gatti, Paola & Chui, Susanna L.M., 2016. "Social-cognitive, relational, and identity-based approaches to leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-134.
    14. Yipeng Liu & Hong Guo & Barrie R. Nault, 2017. "Organization of Public Safety Networks: Spillovers, Interoperability, and Participation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 704-723, April.
    15. Guy Parmentier & Bérangère Szostak, 2025. "The creative capacities of organizations: origin and conceptual framework [Les capacités créatives des organisations : origine et cadre conceptuel]," Post-Print hal-05500982, HAL.
    16. Rockstuhl, Thomas & Van Dyne, Linn, 2018. "A bi-factor theory of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence: Meta-analysis and theoretical extensions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 124-144.
    17. Margherita, Alessandro & Elia, Gianluca & Klein, Mark, 2021. "Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Wex, Felix & Schryen, Guido & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2014. "Emergency response in natural disaster management: Allocation and scheduling of rescue units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 697-708.
    19. Rezvani, Azadeh & Dong, Linying & Khosravi, Pouria, 2017. "Promoting the continuing usage of strategic information systems: The role of supervisory leadership in the successful implementation of enterprise systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 417-430.
    20. Nathan Robert Neale & Kenneth D. Butterfield & Jerry Goodstein & Thomas M. Tripp, 2020. "Managers’ Restorative Versus Punitive Responses to Employee Wrongdoing: A Qualitative Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 603-625, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:52:y:2009:i:2:p:149-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.