IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v45y2013i3p167-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Dunne, Theresa
  • Helliar, Christine
  • Lymer, Andy
  • Mousa, Rania

Abstract

Internet financial reporting is now widespread with most medium and large companies in the developed world providing a wide variety of financial data online. However, much of this information mirrors the paper versions of financial reports, often with little attempt to enhance the decision usability of the data, providing a so called ‘first generation’ of online reporting (ICAEW, 2004). eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has been designed to provide a ‘second generation’ of online reporting, specifically to enhance the usability of the data. Documents rendered in XBRL are digitally-enabled so that it is easier for stakeholders to extract information directly into spreadsheets, or any other XBRL-enabled analysis software, without the need to re-key data thus providing significant improvements in information flows and enhancing inter-company comparability.

Suggested Citation

  • Dunne, Theresa & Helliar, Christine & Lymer, Andy & Mousa, Rania, 2013. "Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 167-182.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:45:y:2013:i:3:p:167-182
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2013.06.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838913000528
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2013.06.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geroski, P. A., 2000. "Models of technology diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 603-625, April.
    2. Dorothy Leonard-Barton & Isabelle Deschamps, 1988. "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(10), pages 1252-1265, October.
    3. Randolph B. Cooper & Robert W. Zmud, 1990. "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 123-139, February.
    4. Howard Mellett & Neil Marriott & Louise Macniven, 2009. "Diffusion of an Accounting Innovation: Fixed Asset Accounting in the NHS in Wales," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 745-764.
    5. Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Piechocki, Maciej & Felden, Carsten & Gräning, André, 2010. "Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 296-306, June.
    6. James C. Brancheau & James C. Wetherbe, 1990. "The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 115-143, June.
    7. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    8. Unerman, Jeffrey & Bennett, Mark, 2004. "Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 685-707, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    2. Richard Slack & Ioannis Tsalavoutas, 2018. "Integrated reporting decision usefulness: Mainstream equity market views," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 184-198, June.
    3. Laura Grassi & Davide Lanfranchi, 2022. "RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 441-479, September.
    4. Ahmed, Ahmed H. & Tahat, Yasean A. & Burton, Bruce M. & Dunne, Theresa M., 2015. "The value relevance of corporate internet reporting: The case of Egypt," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 188-196.
    5. Christ, Katherine L. & Burritt, Roger L., 2016. "ISO 14051: A new era for MFCA implementation and research," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-9.
    6. Valentinetti, Diego & Flores Muñoz, Francisco, 2021. "Internet of things: Emerging impacts on digital reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 549-562.
    7. McLaren, Josie & Appleyard, Tony & Mitchell, Falconer, 2016. "The rise and fall of management accounting systems: A case study investigation of EVA™," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 341-358.
    8. Alkhatib, Esra'a & Ojala, Hannu & Collis, Jill, 2019. "Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Songsheng Chen & Jun Guo & Qingqing Liu & Xiaoxiao Tong, 2021. "The impact of XBRL on real earnings management: unexpected consequences of the XBRL implementation in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 479-504, February.
    10. Laura Saraite-Sariene & Juana Alonso-Cañadas & Federico Galán-Valdivieso & Carmen Caba-Pérez, 2019. "Non-Financial Information versus Financial as a Key to the Stakeholder Engagement: A Higher Education Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Miścikowska Daria, 2022. "An Exploratory Study on Preparers’ Perception of ESEF Reporting: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 191-218, June.
    12. Adel Ali Yassin Alzyoud & Umair Ahmed & Mahmoud Radhwan Hussein Alzgool & Munwar Hussain Pahi, 2020. "Leaders¡¯ Emotional Intelligence and Employee Retention: Mediation of Job Satisfaction in the Hospitality Industry," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Mateusz Mogilski, 2018. "Internet Reporting Index of Companies Listed in the Alternative Trading System New Connect Organized by the Warsaw Stock Exchange (Indeks Raportowania Internetowego spolek notowanych w alternatywnym s," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(27), pages 105-117.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina)., 2003. "Radical and incremental innovations in systems development : an empirical investigation of case tools," Working papers no. 221, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. van Everdingen, Y.M. & Wierenga, B., 2001. "Intra-Firm Adoption Decisions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-21-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Chiara Verbano & Karen Venturini & Giorgio Petroni & Anna Nosella, 2008. "Characteristics of Italian art restoration firms and factors influencing their adoption of laser technology," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 3-34, March.
    4. Howard Mellett & Neil Marriott & Louise Macniven, 2009. "Diffusion of an Accounting Innovation: Fixed Asset Accounting in the NHS in Wales," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 745-764.
    5. Elbanna, Amany & Newman, Mike, 2022. "The bright side and the dark side of top management support in Digital Transformaion –A hermeneutical reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2020. "Consequences of mandated usage of innovations in organizations: developing an innovation decision model of symbolic and forced adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 279-298, December.
    7. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan, 2012. "An investigation into the mixed reported adoption rates for ABC: Evidence from Australia, New Zealand and the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 430-439.
    8. Erdem Kirkbesoglu & Gizem Ogutcu, 2012. "Impact of inter organizational networks on adoption process of information technology," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(3), pages 19-28, June.
    9. Rukanova, B. & Henriksen, H.Z. & Stijn, E. van & Tan, Y.H., 2009. "Bringing is innovation in a highly-regulated environment: a collective action perspective," Serie Research Memoranda 0012, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    10. Ergin Bayrak & John P. Conley & Simon Wilkie, 2011. "The Economics of Cloud Computing," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 27, pages 203-230.
    11. Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Gómez, Jaime & Palomas, Sergio, 2009. "The effects of new technologies on productivity: An intrafirm diffusion-based assessment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1172-1180, September.
    12. Drury, Colin & Tayles, Mike, 2005. "Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organizations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 47-84.
    13. Russell L. Purvis & V. Sambamurthy & Robert W. Zmud, 2001. "The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 117-135, April.
    14. Jui-Che Tu & Chi-Ling Hu, 2018. "A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, November.
    15. Ahmed, Hersi & Daim, Tugrul & Basoglu, Nuri, 2007. "Information technology diffusion in higher education," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 469-482.
    16. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.
    17. van Hezewijk, A.P. & van Assen, M.F. & van de Velde, S.L., 2003. "The impact of innovation and organizational factors on APS adoption: Evidence from the Dutch discrete parts industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-084-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Premkumar, G. & Roberts, Margaret, 1999. "Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 467-484, August.
    19. Francesca Francioli, 2018. "Strategic performance management systems in Italian banks. A research note," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 155-178.
    20. Carol Pollard, 2003. "Exploring Continued and Discontinued Use of IT: A Case Study of OptionFinder, a Group Support System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 171-193, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:45:y:2013:i:3:p:167-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.