IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v31y2021i3p213-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Indrit Troshani
  • Nick Rowbottom

Abstract

Innovations surrounding digital corporate reporting and underlying technology such as XBRL have been slowly introduced to corporate reporting infrastructure since the early 2000s. These innovations promise to enhance the accessibility, accuracy and comparability of reported information, and more effectively meet the needs of information users. Whilst research in the last two decades has attempted to provide evidence of the impact of digital corporate reporting, it remains largely fragmented and sparse. We take an eclectic perspective to review and synthesise existing research on digital corporate reporting and assess the broader research implications for key stakeholders, including preparers and users of corporate reports, regulators and standard‐setters. In doing so, we offer an appraisal for those contemplating the growing influence of digital corporate reporting, and identify opportunities and avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:31:y:2021:i:3:p:213-232
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12334
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    2. Knudsen, Dan-Richard, 2020. "Elusive boundaries, power relations, and knowledge production: A systematic review of the literature on digitalization in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    3. Elizabeth Blankespoor, 2019. "The Impact of Information Processing Costs on Firm Disclosure Choice: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 919-967, September.
    4. Ghani, Erlane K. & Laswad, Fawzi & Tooley, Stuart, 2011. "Functional fixation: Experimental evidence on the presentation of financial information through different digital formats," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 186-199.
    5. Srivastava, Rajendra P. & Kogan, Alexander, 2010. "Assurance on XBRL instance document: A conceptual framework of assertions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 261-273.
    6. Cohen, Eric E. & Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Roohani, Saeed, 2014. "Issues with the communication and integrity of audit reports when financial reporting shifts to an information-centric paradigm," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 400-422.
    7. Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Piechocki, Maciej & Felden, Carsten & Gräning, André, 2010. "Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 296-306, June.
    8. Rania Mousa & Robert Pinsker, 2020. "A case study of XBRL implementation and development at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, January.
    9. Barniv, Ran, 2009. "Does foreign investor demand for information affect forecast accuracy? Evidence from the Chinese stock markets," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 101-118.
    10. Jeong‐Bon Kim & Joung W. Kim & Jee‐Hae Lim, 2019. "Does XBRL Adoption Constrain Earnings Management? Early Evidence from Mandated U.S. Filers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 2610-2634, December.
    11. O'Riain, Seán & Curry, Edward & Harth, Andreas, 2012. "XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 141-162.
    12. Arnold, Vicky & Bedard, Jean C. & Phillips, Jillian R. & Sutton, Steve G., 2012. "The impact of tagging qualitative financial information on investor decision making: Implications for XBRL," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 2-20.
    13. Yuan George Shan & Indrit Troshani, 2016. "The effect of mandatory XBRL and IFRS adoption on audit fees," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 109-135, April.
    14. Jap Efendi & Jin Dong Park & Chandra Subramaniam, 2016. "Does the XBRL Reporting Format Provide Incremental Information Value? A Study Using XBRL Disclosures During the Voluntary Filing Program," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(2), pages 259-285, June.
    15. Indrit Troshani & Lee D. Parker & Andy Lymer, 2015. "Institutionalising XBRL for financial reporting: resorting to regulation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 196-228, February.
    16. Dunne, Theresa & Helliar, Christine & Lymer, Andy & Mousa, Rania, 2013. "Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 167-182.
    17. Efendi, Jap & Park, Jin Dong & Smith, L. Murphy, 2014. "Do XBRL filings enhance informational efficiency? Early evidence from post-earnings announcement drift," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1099-1105.
    18. Joanne Locke & Alan Lowe, 2007. "XBRL: An (Open) Source of Enlightenment or Disillusion?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 585-623.
    19. Boone, Jeffery P., 1998. "Oil and gas reserve value disclosures and bid-ask spreads," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 55-84.
    20. Indrit Troshani & Sally Rao, 2007. "Drivers and Inhibitors to XBRL adoption: A Qualitative Approach to Build a Theory in Under-Researched Areas," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 98-111, October.
    21. Dong, Yi & Li, Oliver Zhen & Lin, Yupeng & Ni, Chenkai, 2016. "Does Information-Processing Cost Affect Firm-Specific Information Acquisition? Evidence from XBRL Adoption," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 435-462, April.
    22. David A. Robb & Fiona H. Rohde & Peter F. Green & Steven Cahan, 2016. "Standard Business Reporting in Australia: efficiency, effectiveness, or both?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(2), pages 509-544, June.
    23. Joanne Locke & Alan Lowe & Andy Lymer & Gary Monroe, 2015. "Interactive data and retail investor decision-making: an experimental study," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(1), pages 213-240, March.
    24. Yoon, Hyungwook & Zo, Hangjung & Ciganek, Andrew P., 2011. "Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 157-163, February.
    25. Denis Cormier & Dominique Dufour & Philippe Luu & Pierre Teller & Robert Teller, 2019. "The Relevance of XBRL Voluntary Disclosure for Stock Market Valuation: The Role of Corporate Governance," Post-Print hal-02009366, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Bradbury & Bryan Howieson, 2021. "Editorial," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 167-168, September.
    2. Atanasov, Atanas, 2022. "Digitalization Of The Corporate Reporting In Europe - Evidence From Bulgarian Wood Based Industry," MPRA Paper 114372, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Miścikowska Daria, 2022. "An Exploratory Study on Preparers’ Perception of ESEF Reporting: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 191-218, June.
    5. Jochen Fähndrich, 2023. "A literature review on the impact of digitalisation on management control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 9-65, March.
    6. Garry D. Carnegie & Paolo Ferri & Lee D. Parker & Shannon I. L. Sidaway & Eva E. Tsahuridu, 2022. "Accounting as Technical, Social and Moral Practice: The Monetary Valuation of Public Cultural, Heritage and Scientific Collections in Financial Reports," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 460-472, December.
    7. Yan Yu & Yi-Tsung Lee, 2022. "Do Inquiry Letters Curb Corporate Catering Motives of High Sustainable R&D Investment? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Can Huang & Yuqiang Cao & Meiting Lu & Yaowen Shan & Yizhou Zhang, 2023. "Messages in online stock forums and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3011-3041, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    2. Alkhatib, Esra'a & Ojala, Hannu & Collis, Jill, 2019. "Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Shan, Yuan George & Troshani, Indrit & Richardson, Grant, 2015. "An empirical comparison of the effect of XBRL on audit fees in the US and Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 89-103.
    4. Valentinetti, Diego & Flores Muñoz, Francisco, 2021. "Internet of things: Emerging impacts on digital reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 549-562.
    5. Songsheng Chen & Jun Guo & Qingqing Liu & Xiaoxiao Tong, 2021. "The impact of XBRL on real earnings management: unexpected consequences of the XBRL implementation in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 479-504, February.
    6. Jie Zhou, 2020. "Does one size fit all? Evidence on XBRL adoption and 10‐K filing lag," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3183-3213, September.
    7. Steven F. Cahan & Seokjoo Chang & Wei Z. Siqueira & Kinsun Tam, 2022. "The roles of XBRL and processed XBRL in 10‐K readability," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 33-68, January.
    8. Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2013. "XBRL for Financial Reporting: Evidence on Italian GAAP versus IFRS," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 237-259, September.
    9. Saiful Azam, 2014. "Perceived Environmental Factors And The Intention To Adopt A Standard Business Reporting Facility: A Survey Of Australian Corporate Cfos," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 10(2), pages 147-173.
    10. Valentinetti, Diego & Rea, Michele A., 2012. "IFRS Taxonomy and financial reporting practices: The case of Italian listed companies," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 163-180.
    11. Adel Ali Yassin Alzyoud & Umair Ahmed & Mahmoud Radhwan Hussein Alzgool & Munwar Hussain Pahi, 2020. "Leaders¡¯ Emotional Intelligence and Employee Retention: Mediation of Job Satisfaction in the Hospitality Industry," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Wafa Sassi & Hakim Ben Othman & Khaled Hussainey, 2023. "The determinants of eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) adoption : a cross-country study," Post-Print hal-04191489, HAL.
    13. Laura Grassi & Davide Lanfranchi, 2022. "RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 441-479, September.
    14. Jap Efendi & Jin Dong Park & Chandra Subramaniam, 2016. "Does the XBRL Reporting Format Provide Incremental Information Value? A Study Using XBRL Disclosures During the Voluntary Filing Program," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(2), pages 259-285, June.
    15. Xi Chen & Yang Ha (Tony) Cho & Yiwei Dou & Baruch Lev, 2022. "Predicting Future Earnings Changes Using Machine Learning and Detailed Financial Data," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 467-515, May.
    16. Miścikowska Daria, 2022. "An Exploratory Study on Preparers’ Perception of ESEF Reporting: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 191-218, June.
    17. André Gräning & Carsten Felden & Maciej Piechocki, 2011. "Status Quo and Potential of XBRL for Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(4), pages 231-239, August.
    18. Hyunjung Nam & Won Gyun No & Youngsu Lee, 2017. "Are Commercial Financial Databases Reliable? New Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Zhenyang Bai & Manabu Sakaue & Fumiko Takeda, 2014. "The Impact of XBRL Adoption on the Information Environment: Evidence from Japan," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 4, pages 49-74, December.
    20. Ariel Markelevich & Lewis Shaw & Hagit Weihs, 2015. "The Israeli XBRL Adoption Experience," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 117-133, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:31:y:2021:i:3:p:213-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.