IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v97y2010i9p1277-1286.html

Optimizing the rate and timing of phosphogypsum application to magnesium-affected soils for crop yield and water productivity enhancement

Author

Listed:
  • Vyshpolsky, F.
  • Mukhamedjanov, K.
  • Bekbaev, U.
  • Ibatullin, S.
  • Yuldashev, T.
  • Noble, A.D.
  • Mirzabaev, A.
  • Aw-Hassan, A.
  • Qadir, M.

Abstract

The levels of magnesium (Mg2+) in irrigation waters and soils are increasing in several irrigation schemes worldwide. Excess levels of Mg2+ in irrigation waters and/or in soils negatively affect soil physical properties (infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity) and ultimately crop growth and yield. Although few studies have been undertaken on productivity enhancement of magnesium-affected soils by adding a source of calcium (Ca2+) to mitigate the effects of excess Mg2+, there is no information available on optimizing the rate and time of the Ca2+-amendments. A 2-year field study was undertaken in southern Kazakhstan by applying phosphogypsum (PG), a source of Ca2+ and a byproduct of the phosphorous fertilizer industry, to a magnesium-affected soil. There were five treatments with four replications: (1) control (without PG application); (2) PG application in January (before snowfall) equivalent to PG requirement for 0.3m soil depth (3.3tha-1); (3) PG application in January equivalent to PG requirement for 0.6m soil depth (8.0tha-1); (4) PG application in April (after snowmelt) at 3.3tha-1; and (5) PG application in April (after snowmelt) at 8.0tha-1. All treatment plots were grown with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), which is the most important summer crop in the region. The PG treatments performed significantly better than the control in terms of (1) improved soil quality with a reduction in exchangeable magnesium percentage (EMP) levels; (2) enhanced water movement into and through the soil vis-à-vis increased moisture storage in the root zone for use by the plant roots; (3) increased irrigation efficiency; (4) increased cotton yield and water productivity; and (5) greater financial benefits. In terms of the best rate and time of application, PG applied before the snowfall improved the soil properties to a greater extent than its application in spring after snowmelt. The economic benefits from the amendment application at 3.3tha-1 were double those from the treatments where it was applied at 8.0tha-1, suggesting that the lower rate was economically optimal. In addition to improving crop productivity, the study demonstrated the beneficial use of an industrial waste material in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Vyshpolsky, F. & Mukhamedjanov, K. & Bekbaev, U. & Ibatullin, S. & Yuldashev, T. & Noble, A.D. & Mirzabaev, A. & Aw-Hassan, A. & Qadir, M., 2010. "Optimizing the rate and timing of phosphogypsum application to magnesium-affected soils for crop yield and water productivity enhancement," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1277-1286, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:9:p:1277-1286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00083-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:iwt:bosers:h021374 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:iwt:bosers:h041504 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:iwt:bosers:h041260 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hussain, Intizar & Sakthivadivel, Ramasamy & Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Mudasser, Muhammad & Molden, David J., 2003. "Land and water productivity of wheat in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India and Pakistan: a comparative analysis," IWMI Research Reports 52972, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Molden, David J., 1997. "Accounting for water use and productivity," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 113623, January.
    6. Hussain, Intizar & Sakthivadivel, R. & Amarasinghe, Upali A., 2003. "Land and water productivity of wheat in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India and Pakistan: a comparative analysis," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    7. Qadir, M. & Sharma, B.R. & Bruggeman, A. & Choukr-Allah, R. & Karajeh, F., 2007. "Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 2-22, January.
    8. repec:iwt:bosers:h040193 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:iwt:rerpts:h031469 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Wichelns, Dennis & Oster, J.D., 2006. "Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 114-127, November.
    11. Vyshpolsky, F. & Bekbaev, U. & Mukhamedjanov, K. & Ibatullin, S. & Paroda, R. & Yuldashev, T. & Karimov, Akmal & Aw-Hassan, A. & Noble, Andrew & Qadir, Manzoor, "undated". "Enhancing the productivity of high-magnesium soil and water resources," IWMI Reports 273359, International Water Management Institute.
    12. repec:iwt:bosers:h039769 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qadir, M. & Sposito, G. & Smith, C.J. & Oster, J.D., 2021. "Reassessing irrigation water quality guidelines for sodicity hazard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Ziskin, Rona & Dag, Arnon & Yermiyahu, Uri & Levy, Guy J., 2024. "Different amendments for combating soil sodicity in an olive orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bessembinder, J.J.E. & Leffelaar, P.A. & Dhindwal, A.S. & Ponsioen, T.C., 2005. "Which crop and which drop, and the scope for improvement of water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 113-130, May.
    2. Ines, Amor V.M. & Honda, Kiyoshi & Das Gupta, Ashim & Droogers, Peter & Clemente, Roberto S., 2006. "Combining remote sensing-simulation modeling and genetic algorithm optimization to explore water management options in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 221-232, June.
    3. Giordano, Meredith & Turral, H. & Scheierling, S. M. & Treguer, D. O. & McCornick, Peter G, 2017. "Beyond “More Crop per Drop”: evolving thinking on agricultural water productivity," IWMI Research Reports 257962, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Singh, R. & van Dam, J.C. & Feddes, R.A., 2006. "Water productivity analysis of irrigated crops in Sirsa district, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 253-278, April.
    5. Cai, Xueliang & Sharma, Bharat R. & Matin, Mir Abdul & Sharma, Devesh & Gunasinghe, Sarath, 2010. "An assessment of crop water productivity in the Indus and Ganges River Basins: current status and scope for improvement," IWMI Research Reports 112970, International Water Management Institute.
    6. Vazifedoust, M. & van Dam, J.C. & Feddes, R.A. & Feizi, M., 2008. "Increasing water productivity of irrigated crops under limited water supply at field scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 89-102, February.
    7. repec:iwt:bosers:h042636 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mohammed Mainuddin & Mac Kirby, 2009. "Agricultural productivity in the lower Mekong Basin: trends and future prospects for food security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(1), pages 71-82, February.
    9. Kumar, M. Dinesh & Trivedi, K. & Singh, O.P., 2009. "Analyzing the impact of quality and reliability of irrigation water on crop water productivity using an irrigation quality index," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    10. Islam, AFM Tariqul & Islam, AKM Saiful & Islam, GM Tarekul & Bala, Sujit Kumar & Salehin, Mashfiqus & Choudhury, Apurba Kanti & Dey, Nepal C. & Mahboob, M. Golam, 2023. "Simulation of water productivity of wheat in northwestern Bangladesh using multi-satellite data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    11. repec:iwt:bosers:h039317 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:iwt:conppr:h033989 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Plénet, Daniel & Giauque, Pierre & Navarro, Eric & Millan, Muriel & Hilaire, Christian & Hostalnou, Eric & Lyoussoufi, Abder & Samie, Jean-François, 2009. "Using on-field data to develop the EFI© information system to characterise agronomic productivity and labour efficiency in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) orchards in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 1-10, April.
    14. Basel F. Y. Khader & Yigezu A. Yigezu & Mahmud A. Duwayri & Abdul Aziz Niane & Kamil Shideed, 2019. "Where in the value chain are we losing the most food? The case of wheat in Jordan," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(5), pages 1009-1027, October.
    15. Aliasghar Montazar & E. Zadbagher, 2010. "An Analytical Hierarchy Model for Assessing Global Water Productivity of Irrigation Networks in Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(11), pages 2817-2832, September.
    16. repec:iwt:bosers:h041504 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:iwt:conppr:h044137 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Akram, Agha Ali, 2014. "Agricultural Water Allocation Efficiency and Farmer Adaptation to Heterogeneous Water Availability in a Developing Country Canal Irrigation System," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170855, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Muthuwatta, L.P. & Rientjes, T.H.M. & Bos, M.G., 2013. "Strategies to increase wheat production in the water scarce Karkheh River Basin, Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Mohammad Alauddin & Upali A. Amarasinghe & Bharat R. Sharma, 2014. "Four decades of rice water productivity in Bangladesh: A spatio-temporal analysis of district level panel data," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 51-64.
    21. repec:iwt:rerpts:h041463 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Kang, Shaozhong & Hao, Xinmei & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Su, Xiaoling & Lu, Hongna & Li, Xiaolin & Huo, Zailin & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng, 2017. "Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: From research to practice," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 5-17.
    23. Zijie Sang & Ge Zhang & Haiqing Wang & Wangyang Zhang & Yuxiu Chen & Mingyang Han & Ke Yang, 2023. "Effective Solutions to Ecological and Water Environment Problems in the Sanjiang Plain: Utilization of Farmland Drainage Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    24. Neville D Crossman & Jeffrey D Connor & Brett A Bryan & David A Summers & John Ginnivan, 2009. "Reconfiguring an Irrigation Landscape to Improve Provision of Ecosystem Services," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2009-07, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    25. Ahmad, M.D. & Turral, H. & Nazeer, A., 2009. "Diagnosing irrigation performance and water productivity through satellite remote sensing and secondary data in a large irrigation system of Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 551-564, April.
    26. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:9:p:1277-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.