IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v231y2026ics0308521x25002756.html

Farmers' preferences for adoption of service plants in biological control and implications for agricultural system design

Author

Listed:
  • Gumbau, Margot
  • Kupka, Johanna
  • Penet, Laurent
  • Causeret, François
  • Blazy, Jean-Marc

Abstract

Decreasing recourse to chemicals in agriculture is a major challenge in the development of more sustainable agrosystems. Conservation biological control could be key to addressing this challenge by promoting pest regulation using natural enemies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gumbau, Margot & Kupka, Johanna & Penet, Laurent & Causeret, François & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2026. "Farmers' preferences for adoption of service plants in biological control and implications for agricultural system design," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:231:y:2026:i:c:s0308521x25002756
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25002756
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jolanta Kowalska & Małgorzata Antkowiak & Paweł Sienkiewicz, 2022. "Flower Strips and Their Ecological Multifunctionality in Agricultural Fields," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Huber, Robert & Kreft, Cordelia & Späti, Karin & Finger, Robert, 2024. "Quantifying the importance of farmers' behavioral factors in ex-ante assessments of policies supporting sustainable farming practices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Chopin, Pierre & Doré, Thierry & Guindé, Loïc & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2015. "MOSAICA: A multi-scale bioeconomic model for the design and ex ante assessment of cropping system mosaics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 26-39.
    4. Ronald Guillaume & Nathalie Boissot, 2001. "Resistance to Diaphania hyalinata (Lepidoptera : Crambidae) in Cucumis species," Post-Print hal-02678841, HAL.
    5. Camille Luis & Magali Aubert, 2023. "Evaluating the impact of direct sales on farms’ sustainability: a comparison of metropolitan and overseas France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 243-271, December.
    6. Blazy, Jean-Marc & Carpentier, Alain & Thomas, Alban, 2011. "The willingness to adopt agro-ecological innovations: Application of choice modelling to Caribbean banana planters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 140-150.
    7. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    8. Blazy, Jean-Marc & Ozier-Lafontaine, Harry & Doré, Thierry & Thomas, Alban & Wery, Jacques, 2009. "A methodological framework that accounts for farm diversity in the prototyping of crop management systems. Application to banana-based systems in Guadeloupe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 30-41, June.
    9. Bryan Bollinger & Kenneth Gillingham & A. Justin Kirkpatrick & Steven Sexton, 2022. "Visibility and Peer Influence in Durable Good Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 453-476, May.
    10. Feder, Gershon, 1980. "Farm Size, Risk Aversion and the Adoption of New Technology under Uncertainty," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 263-283, July.
    11. Prost, Lorène, 2021. "Revitalizing agricultural sciences with design sciences," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Camille Luis & Magali Aubert & Laurent Parrot, 2023. "Is being member of a network sufficient to implement agroecological practices? The key role of farmers’ perceptions in the French West Indies," Post-Print hal-04212657, HAL.
    13. Camille Luis & Magali Aubert, 2023. "Evaluating the impact of direct sales on farms’ sustainability: a comparison of metropolitan and overseas France," Post-Print hal-04111445, HAL.
    14. Awudu Abdulai & Wallace Huffman, 2014. "The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(1), pages 26-43.
    15. L. Asprooth & M. Norton & R. Galt, 2023. "The adoption of conservation practices in the Corn Belt: the role of one formal farmer network, Practical Farmers of Iowa," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(4), pages 1559-1580, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    2. Selbonne, S. & Guindé, L. & Belmadani, A. & Bonine, C. & L. Causeret, F. & Duval, M. & Sierra, J. & Blazy, J.M., 2022. "Designing scenarios for upscaling climate-smart agriculture on a small tropical island," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Féménia, Fabienne & Letort, Elodie, 2016. "How to achieve significant reduction in pesticide use? An empirical evaluation of the impacts of pesticide taxation associated to a change in cropping practice," Working Papers 233482, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    4. Ray, M. & Maredia, M. & Shupp, R., 2018. "Risk Preferences and Climate Smart Technology Adoption: A Duration Model Approach for India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277502, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Ray, Mukesh K. & Maredia, Mywish K. & Shupp, Robert S., "undated". "Risk Preferences and the Pace of Climate Smart Technology Adoption: A Duration Model Approach from India," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258255, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Coromaldi, Manuela & Pallante, Giacomo & Savastano, Sara, 2015. "Adoption of modern varieties, farmers' welfare and crop biodiversity: Evidence from Uganda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 346-358.
    7. Meylan, Louise & Merot, Anne & Gary, Christian & Rapidel, Bruno, 2013. "Combining a typology and a conceptual model of cropping system to explore the diversity of relationships between ecosystem services: The case of erosion control in coffee-based agroforestry systems in Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 52-64.
    8. Deffontaines, Landry & Mottes, Charles & Della Rossa, Pauline & Lesueur-Jannoyer, Magalie & Cattan, Philippe & Le Bail, Marianne, 2020. "How farmers learn to change their weed management practices: Simple changes lead to system redesign in the French West Indies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Ray, Mukesh & Maredia, Mywish, "undated". "Do Smaller States Lead to More Development? Evidence from Splitting of Large States in India," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235732, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Femenia, Fabienne & Letort, Elodie, 2016. "How to significantly reduce pesticide use: An empirical evaluation of the impacts of pesticide taxation associated with a change in cropping practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 27-37.
    11. Qiusheng Li & Fang Zeng & Hao Mei & Tianqi Li & Dasheng Li, 2019. "Roles of Motivation, Opportunity, Ability, and Trust in the Willingness of Farmers to Adopt Green Fertilization Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Shuoyan He, 2024. "How does social capital affect farmers’ environment-friendly technology adoption behavior? A case study in Hubei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18361-18384, July.
    13. Kunxi Nie & Yueji Zhu, 2025. "Internet access, female’s non-farm employment, and income effects: insights from China," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Evan J. Miller-Tait & Sandeep Mohapatra & M. K. (Marty) Luckert & Brent M. Swallow, 2019. "Processing technologies for undervalued grains in rural India: on target to help the poor?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(1), pages 151-166, February.
    16. Kassie, Menale & Fisher, Monica & Muricho, Geoffrey & Diiro, Gracious, 2020. "Women’s empowerment boosts the gains in dietary diversity from agricultural technology adoption in rural Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Rhys Murrian & Paul A. Raschky & Klaus Ackermann, 2024. "Friends, Key Players and the Adoption and Use of Experience Goods," Monash Economics Working Papers 2024-17, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    18. Bahta, Y. & Owusu-Sekyeer, E., 2018. "Nexus between homestead food garden programme and land ownership in South Africa: Implication on the income of vegetable farmers," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277732, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Aude Ridier & Caroline Roussy & Karim Chaib, 2021. "Adoption of crop diversification by specialized grain farmers in south-western France: evidence from a choice-modelling experiment," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 265-283, September.
    20. Riju Joshi & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2025. "Heterogeneity and Heteroskedasticity in Endogenous Switching Models: Estimating the Effects of Physician Advice on Calorie Consumption," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(5), pages 540-553, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:231:y:2026:i:c:s0308521x25002756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.