IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-24-00486.html

The heterogeneous effect of natural resource rents on vulnerable employment in sub-Saharan Africa: Does the quality of institutions matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Issa Dianda

    (Université Nazi BONI)

  • Gnanderman Sirpe

    (Université Thomas SANKARA)

  • Nouhoun Maiga

    (Université Thomas SANKARA)

Abstract

Natural resources have been seen both a blessing and a curse. This paper investigates the effect of natural resources rents on vulnerable employment in sub-Saharan Africa and explores the role of institutional quality. The data used cover 30 countries over the period 2005-2018. The results from the data-driven finite mixture model estimation highlight three vulnerable employment regimes. In the first regime, natural resources rents increase vulnerable employment. In the second regime, natural resources rents do not affect vulnerable employment while they reduce vulnerable employment in the third regime. Thus, natural resources are curse in the first regime, neutral in the second and blessing in the third. The results also show that countries with lower political risk, especially better investment profile, less internal conflicts, and where law and order and rigorous and impartial public administration prevail, are more likely to belong to the resource blessing regime. These results underline the need for resource-rich countries to improve the quality of their institutions to benefit from the blessing of natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Issa Dianda & Gnanderman Sirpe & Nouhoun Maiga, 2026. "The heterogeneous effect of natural resource rents on vulnerable employment in sub-Saharan Africa: Does the quality of institutions matter?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 46(2), pages 446-460.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-24-00486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2026/Volume46/EB-26-V46-I2-P38.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-24-00486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.