IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-18-00518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The path to an economics PhD

Author

Listed:
  • Garrison Schlauch

    (UCSB)

  • Richard Startz

    (UCSB)

Abstract

We examine the pre-graduate school characteristics of PhD candidates graduating from the top 50 American economics programs. Among candidates from American undergraduate institutions, we find that those who are male, have undergraduate honors, hold an undergraduate major or minor in math and come from highly ranked undergraduate institutions are more likely to graduate from from highly ranked PhD programs. They are more likely to have research assistant experience and less likely to have a graduate degree between completing their undergraduate studies and beginning their PhD (unlike international candidates). In the top five PhD programs, nearly 60% of Americans entered with post-undergraduate research assistant experience while 10% of Americans and 75% of international students entered with a graduate degree. Finally, American candidates from liberal arts colleges or unranked undergraduate institutions graduate from lower ranked PhD programs than those from national universities, i.e. non-liberal arts, non-regional, ranked universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Garrison Schlauch & Richard Startz, 2018. "The path to an economics PhD," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 1864-1876.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2018/Volume38/EB-18-V38-I4-P173.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy A. Stock & John J. Siegfried, 2014. "Fifteen Years of Research on Graduate Education in Economics: What Have we Learned?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 287-303, December.
    2. Shelly Lundberg, 2019. "Report: Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (CSWEP)," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 676-694, May.
    3. T. Aldrich Finegan & Wendy A. Stock & John J. Siegfried, 2006. "Matriculation in U.S. Economics Ph.D. Programs: How Many Accepted Americans Do Not Enroll?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 453-457, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todd R. Jones & Arielle A. Sloan, 2024. "The academic origins of economics faculty," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 434-454, October.
    2. Todd R. Jones & Arielle A. Sloan, 2024. "The academic origins of economics faculty," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 434-454, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Card & Stefano DellaVigna & Patricia Funk & Nagore Iriberri, 2020. "Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 269-327.
    2. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. David Card & Stefano DellaVigna & Patricia Funk & Nagore Iriberri, 2022. "Gender Differences in Peer Recognition by Economists," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(5), pages 1937-1971, September.
    4. Yihui Lan & Ian W. Li & Zong Ken Chai & Kenneth W. Clements, 2023. "The Market for Economics and Finance PhDs," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 163-191, June.
    5. Davies, Benjamin, 2022. "Gender sorting among economists: Evidence from the NBER," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Valerie K. Bostwick & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2022. "Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(2), pages 397-436.
    7. Kenneth Clements & Jiawei Si, 2017. "WHAT DO AUSTRALIAN ECONOMICS PhDs DO? THE UWA EXPERIENCE," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 17-16, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    8. Püttmann, Vitus & Thomsen, Stephan L. & Trunzer, Johannes, 2020. "Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-679, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, revised Mar 2021.
    9. Emily C. Marshall & Brian O’Roark, 2023. "Journal Authorship by Gender: A Comparison of Economic Education, General Interest, and Fields From 2009 to 2019," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(1), pages 100-109, March.
    10. Megalokonomou, Rigissa & Vidal-Fernandez, Marian & Yengin, Duygu, 2021. "Underrepresentation of Women in Undergraduate Economics Degrees in Europe: A Comparison with STEM and Business," IZA Policy Papers 175, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Paredes, Valentina & Paserman, M. Daniele & Pino, Francisco J., 2020. "Does Economics Make You Sexist?," IZA Discussion Papers 13223, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Todd R. Jones & Arielle A. Sloan, 2024. "The academic origins of economics faculty," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 434-454, October.
    13. Davies, Benjamin, 2022. "Sex-based sorting among economists: Evidence from the NBER," SocArXiv zeb7a, Center for Open Science.
    14. Kenneth Clements & Jiawei Si, 2019. "What Do Australian Economics PhDs Do?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 52(1), pages 134-144, March.
    15. Paula Pereda & Maria Dolores Montoya Diaz & Fabiana Rocha & Liz Matsunaga & Bruna Pugialli Borges & Jesus Mena-Chalco & Renata Narita & Clara Brenck, 2023. "Are women less persistent? Evidence from submissions to a nationwide meeting of economics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 1757-1768, April.
    16. Todd R. Jones & Arielle A. Sloan, 2024. "The academic origins of economics faculty," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 434-454, October.
    17. Alice H. Wu, 2020. "Gender Bias among Professionals: An Identity-Based Interpretation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(5), pages 867-880, December.
    18. Bransch, Felix & Kvasnicka, Michael, 2022. "Male Gatekeepers: Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 714-732.
    19. Martínez-Correa, Jimmy & Andersen, Steffen & d’Astous, Philippe & H. Shore, Stephen, 2020. "Cross-Program Differences in Returns to Education and the Gender Earnings Gap," Working papers 48, Red Investigadores de Economía.
    20. Christina Gravert & Katrine Thornfeldt Sørensen, 2020. "Gender differences in submission strategies? A survey of early-career economists," CEBI working paper series 20-22, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economics PhD;

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.