IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v31y2011i2p257-284.html

The Impact of Ohio's EdChoice on Traditional Public School Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Carr

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Carr, 2011. "The Impact of Ohio's EdChoice on Traditional Public School Performance," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 31(2), pages 257-284, Spring/Su.
    • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:257-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2011/5/cj31n2-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:6364 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chiang, Hanley, 2009. "How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(9-10), pages 1045-1057, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna J. Egalite & Jonathan N. Mills, 2021. "Competitive Impacts of Means-Tested Vouchers on Public School Performance: Evidence from Louisiana," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 16(1), pages 66-91, Winter.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richardson, J.T., 2015. "Accountability incentives and academic achievement: Distributional impacts of accountability when standards are set low," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Pierre Koning & Karen Wiel, 2012. "School Responsiveness to Quality Rankings: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 339-355, December.
    3. Friesen, Jane & Harris, Benjamin Cerf & Woodcock, Simon, 2013. "Open Enrolment and Student Achievement," CLSSRN working papers clsrn_admin-2013-46, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 22 Mar 2014.
    4. Trinidad, Jose Eos, 2022. "Meaning-Making, Negotiation, and Change: Reviewing the Organization and Ecology of School Accountability," SocArXiv ywm8b, Center for Open Science.
    5. Ronard Mateyo Mbola & Martin Chabu & Samulu Mudolo & Kashumba Kabombo, 2025. "Exploring the Role of School Leadership in Managing Financial Resources in Zambian Secondary Schools," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 2703-2715, June.
    6. Michael Hurwitz & Jonathan Smith, 2018. "Student Responsiveness To Earnings Data In The College Scorecard," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 1220-1243, April.
    7. Filer, Randall K. & Münich, Daniel, 2013. "Responses of private and public schools to voucher funding," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 269-285.
    8. Jacobus Cilliers & Isaac M. Mbiti & Andrew Zeitlin, 2021. "Can Public Rankings Improve School Performance?: Evidence from a Nationwide Reform in Tanzania," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 56(3), pages 655-685.
    9. Sims, David P., 2013. "Can failure succeed? Using racial subgroup rules to analyze the effect of school accountability failure on student performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 262-274.
    10. Michael D. Bates & Leslie E. Papke & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2024. "Non linear correlated random effects models with endogeneity and unbalanced panels," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 713-732, October.
    11. Benedikt Siegler, 2013. "What triggers school improvement? Evidence from a court induced change in Florida's A+ accountability plan," Working Papers 135, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    12. David S. Lee & Thomas Lemieux, 2010. "Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(2), pages 281-355, June.
    13. Jane Friesen & Benjamin Cerf Harris & Simon Woodcock, 2015. "Expanding School Choice through Open Enrolment: Lessons from British Columbia," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 418, February.
    14. Gershberg, Alec Ian & González, Pablo Alberto & Meade, Ben, 2012. "Understanding and Improving Accountability in Education: A Conceptual Framework and Guideposts from Three Decentralization Reform Experiences in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 1024-1041.
    15. David J. Deming & Sarah Cohodes & Jennifer Jennings & Christopher Jencks, 2016. "School Accountability, Postsecondary Attainment, and Earnings," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(5), pages 848-862, December.
    16. Donald Rey Baum & Husein Abdul-Hamid & Laura Lewis De Brular & Oni Lusk-Stover & Leslie Ofosu Tettey, 2017. "Ghana Engaging the Private Sector in Education," World Bank Publications - Reports 28258, The World Bank Group.
    17. Jonah Rockoff & Lesley J. Turner, 2010. "Short-Run Impacts of Accountability on School Quality," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 119-147, November.
    18. Koohyun Kwon & Soonwoo Kwon, 2020. "Inference in Regression Discontinuity Designs under Monotonicity," Papers 2011.14216, arXiv.org.
    19. Philip Gleason & Alexandra Resch & Jillian Berk, 2018. "RD or Not RD: Using Experimental Studies to Assess the Performance of the Regression Discontinuity Approach," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-33, February.
    20. Figlio, D. & Karbownik, K. & Salvanes, K.G., 2016. "Education Research and Administrative Data," Handbook of the Economics of Education,, Elsevier.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:257-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.