IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000549/019357.html

Influencia de la religiosidad, la norma subjetiva y la efectividad percibida del consumidor en el consumo socialmente responsable

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Camilo Mejía
  • Rafael Curr�s-P�rez
  • Carlos Manuel C�rdoba-Segovia

Abstract

Esta investigación analizó la relación entre religiosidad, norma subjetiva y efectividad percibida del consumidor en la intención de compra de productos socialmente responsables. La investigación empírica se basó en un cuestionario repartido, en igual proporción, a 485 personas ubicadas en Colombia y Espana. Para su evaluación se realizó un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales a partir de la técnica Partial Least Square (PLS). Se encontró similitud en los resultados entre ambos países, comprobándose, en los dos casos, la influencia de la religiosidad sobre las dimensiones de consumo responsable. También se pudo determinar la importancia de la norma subjetiva sobre este tipo de consumo. Sin embargo, no fue posible comprobar la hipótesis que relacionaba la efectividad percibida por el consumidor en este tipo de compras. Con estos resultados se concluyó acerca de la importancia del papel de la religiosidad en las intenciones de consumo responsable, debido, principalmente, a su función simbólica y socializadora como elemento de aculturación y de expresión de identidad. Asimismo, fue posible ampliar la teoría del comportamiento planificado al explorar la norma subjetiva en este tipo de compras. El estudio sugirió investigaciones sobre consumo responsable y sus factores influyentes, y propuso estrategias de marketing para fortalecerlo en favor del medio ambiente, la sociedad y la economía de las organizaciones.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Camilo Mejía & Rafael Curr�s-P�rez & Carlos Manuel C�rdoba-Segovia, 2021. "Influencia de la religiosidad, la norma subjetiva y la efectividad percibida del consumidor en el consumo socialmente responsable," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 7(14).
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000549:019357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Metin Cosgel & Lanse Minkler, 2004. "Religious Identity and Consumption," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 339-350.
    2. Mohd Danish Kirmani & Mohammed Naved Khan, 2016. "Environmental attributes and market segmentation: insights from India," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 73-92.
    3. Webb, Deborah J. & Mohr, Lois A. & Harris, Katherine E., 2008. "A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 91-98, February.
    4. Sood, James & Nasu, Yukio, 1995. "Religiosity and nationality : An exploratory study of their effect on consumer behavior in Japan and the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-9, September.
    5. Raymond J. Jones & Timothy M. Reilly & Marcus Z. Cox & Brooklyn M. Cole, 2017. "Gender Makes a Difference: Investigating Consumer Purchasing Behavior and Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility Policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 133-144, March.
    6. Hamza Khraim, 2010. "Measuring Religiosity in Consumer Research From an Islamic Perspective," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 52-78, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Currás‐Pérez & Consuelo Dolz‐Dolz & María J. Miquel‐Romero & Isabel Sánchez‐García, 2018. "How social, environmental, and economic CSR affects consumer‐perceived value: Does perceived consumer effectiveness make a difference?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 733-747, September.
    2. Esa Mangeloja, 2004. "Interrelationship of economic growth and regional religious properties," ERSA conference papers ersa04p94, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Steiner, B.E. & Peschel, A.O. & Grebitus, C., 2017. "Multi-Product Category Choices Labeled for Ecological Footprints: Exploring Psychographics and Evolved Psychological Biases for Characterizing Latent Consumer Classes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-264.
    4. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya & Sumi Jha, 2020. "Explicating micro foundations of corporate social responsibility: a moderated-mediation study of customer, investor and employee roles," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(4), pages 619-640, September.
    5. Elliot, Statia & Papadopoulos, Nicolas, 2016. "Of products and tourism destinations: An integrative, cross-national study of place image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1157-1165.
    6. Jiang, Kan & Mo, Silan & Qin, Meilian, 2024. "Descriptive or injunctive? The effect of sustainable normative appeals and advertising orientations on environmentally responsible consumption behavior in a collective action perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Karimi, Abdul Hakim, 2024. "Measuring Sustainability Literacy: Scale Development and Validation," MPRA Paper 122875, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Long-Chuan Lu & Hsiu-Hua Chang & Alan Chang, 2015. "Consumer Personality and Green Buying Intention: The Mediate Role of Consumer Ethical Beliefs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 205-219, March.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:9zadu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. María Del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach, 2019. "Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross‐national analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 238-247, January.
    11. Tamaki Kitagawa & Kenichi Kashiwagi & Hiroko Isoda, 2020. "Effect of Religious and Cultural Information of Olive Oil on Consumer Behavior: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    12. María Manuela Palacios-González & Antonio Chamorro-Mera, 2020. "Analysis of Socially Responsible Consumption: A Segmentation of Spanish Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Silhouette-Dercourt, Virginie & de Lassus, Christel & Darpy, Denis, 2014. "How second-generation consumers choose where to shop: A cross-cultural semiotic analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1059-1067.
    14. Ying Sun & Shanyong Wang & Lan Gao & Jun Li, 2018. "Unearthing the effects of personality traits on consumer’s attitude and intention to buy green products," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 299-314, August.
    15. Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Milena Micevski & Nina Michaelidou & Ekaterina Nemkova, 2017. "Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 249-265, March.
    16. Mubariz Mammadli, 2022. "Environmentally Responsible Business Approaches in Azerbaijan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Kaplan, Sigal & de Abreu e Silva, João & Di Ciommo, Floridea, 2014. "The relationship between young people׳s transit use and their perceptions of equity concepts in transit service provision," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 79-87.
    18. Carmen Berné-Manero & Marta Pedraja-Iglesias & Pilar Ramo-Sáez, 2017. "Socially responsible markets involved in the consumer-organization identification process," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(2), pages 179-196, June.
    19. Ilisa Fajriyati & Adi Zakaria Afiff & Gita Gayatri & Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati, 2022. "Attributes Influencing Overall Tourist Satisfaction and Its Consequences for Muslim-Majority Destination," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    20. Nikolaos Satsios & Spyros Hadjidakis & Ioannis Sotiropoulos & Nicholas Tsounis, 2020. "Religiosity and Intention towards Saving of a Muslim Minority in Greece," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, March.
    21. Nor Khasimah Aliman & Zailin Zainal Ariffin & Shareena Mohamed Hashim, 2018. "Religiosity Commitment and Decision-Making Styles Among Generation Y Muslim Consumers in Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 554-576, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000549:019357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feitmco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.