IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000549/019255.html

El efecto del boca a boca electrónico en el interés de compra de los consumidores

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Nuriman Izudin; Endang Ruswanti; Moehammad Unggul Januarko
  • Endang Ruswanti
  • Moehammad Unggul Januarko

Abstract

YouTube crea oportunidades valiosas para las redes sociales con el boca a boca electrónico (eWOM en inglés). Las personas ahora hablan de productos y otros asuntos con sus amigos y nuevos conocidos en internet. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar el efecto del boca a boca electrónico en conversaciones en YouTube sobre el interés de compra de los consumidores. Basado en el Modelo de Adopción de Información y la Teoría de la Acción Razonada, se desarrolló el Modelo de Aceptación de Información. El método de esta investigación fue de carácter cuantitativo. La población analizada estuvo compuesta por los seguidores de un canal de YouTube y se seleccionó usando muestreo intencional. Se implementaron técnicas de análisis de datos usando el Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales del paquete Lisrel. Los resultados muestran que la calidad, credibilidad, necesidad, utilidad y adopción de la información, así como la actitud hacia la misma, influencian el interés de compra de los consumidores.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Nuriman Izudin; Endang Ruswanti; Moehammad Unggul Januarko & Endang Ruswanti & Moehammad Unggul Januarko, 2020. "El efecto del boca a boca electrónico en el interés de compra de los consumidores," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 6(12), pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000549:019255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1618
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    2. Imran Anwar MIR & Kashif Ur REHMAN, 2013. "Factors affecting consumer attitudes and intentions toward user-generated product content on YouTube," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 8(4), Winter.
    3. James E. Bailey & Sammy W. Pearson, 1983. "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 530-545, May.
    4. Naoshi Doi & Hitoshi Hayakawa, 2020. "Electronic word-of-mouth: a survey from an economics perspective," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 303-320, May.
    5. , Aisdl, 2013. "Bank Marketing Management: Case: Sacombank," OSF Preprints pzjfh, Center for Open Science.
    6. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diwanji, Vaibhav S. & Cortese, Juliann, 2020. "Contrasting user generated videos versus brand generated videos in ecommerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Sanduni I. Senaratne & Samantha M. Samarasinghe, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Intention to Adopt M-Learning," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 150-164, February.
    3. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    4. Deli Yuan & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Atikur Rahaman & Mohammad Mainul Hossain & Shaharin Akter, 2021. "Analyzing of User Attitudes Toward Intention to Use Social Media for Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    5. Yajiong Xue & Huigang Liang & Liansheng Wu, 2011. "Punishment, Justice, and Compliance in Mandatory IT Settings," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 400-414, June.
    6. Kumar, Sumit & Prakash, Gyan & Gupta, Bhumika & Cappiello, Giuseppe, 2023. "How e-WOM influences consumers' purchase intention towards private label brands on e-commerce platforms: Investigation through IAM (Information Adoption Model) and ELM (Elaboration Likelihood Model) Models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    8. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    9. Choi-Meng Leong & Alexa Min-Wei Loi & Steve Woon, 2022. "The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 145-157, June.
    10. Young Joon Park & Jaewoo Joo & Charin Polpanumas & Yeujun Yoon, 2021. "“Worse Than What I Read?” The External Effect of Review Ratings on the Online Review Generation Process: An Empirical Analysis of Multiple Product Categories Using Amazon.com Review Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Xu, Zeshui & Ge, Zijing & Wang, Xinxin & Skare, Marinko, 2021. "Bibliometric analysis of technology adoption literature published from 1997 to 2020," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Tran Thi Kim Phuong & Tran Trung Vinh, 2019. "An empirical study examining an extended TAM model in the context of a Facebook event page," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(9), pages 238-353, September.
    13. Huang, Tony Cheng-Kui & Liu, Chuang-Chun & Chang, Dong-Cheng, 2012. "An empirical investigation of factors influencing the adoption of data mining tools," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 257-270.
    14. Dani Safaa & Faridi Mohamed, 2020. "The factors of acceptance and use of HRIS," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 397-404, July.
    15. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Colin C Williams, 2021. "Tackling Undeclared Self-Employment in South-East Europe: from Deterrents to Preventative Policy Measures," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 280-298, July.
    17. Chia-chen Wang & Chin-ta Chen & Shu-chen Yang & Cheng-kiang Farn, 2009. "Pirate or Buy? The Moderating Effect of Idolatry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 81-93, November.
    18. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    19. Mustapha Bachiri, 2016. "Determinants of Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: Evidence from Moroccan University," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 83-89, November.
    20. Hyun Hye Kim & EunKyoung Han, 2020. "The Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Identify Determinants of Donation Intention: Towards the Comparative Examination of Positive and Negative Reputations of Nonprofit Organizations CEO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000549:019255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feitmco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.