IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/021485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of administrative thinking in knowledge management and innovation: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Darwin Daniel Ordoñez Iturralde

    (Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos)

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines how management thinking approaches can be integrated into knowledge management in order to promote innovation and improve operational efficiency in contemporary organizations. Objective:To analyze management strategies that optimize the use of organizational knowledge and highlight its impact on innovation and business performance. Methodology:A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA method, collecting studies published between 2019 and 2023 in ScienceDirect, SpringerLink and Emerald Insight databases. Twenty-seven articles exploring the relationship between management thinking, knowledge management, innovation and operational efficiency were selected. Results:Findings show that collaborative strategies, such as communities of practice and learning, facilitate knowledge creation and transfer; while technological tools, such as knowledge management systems and data analytics, optimize decision making and improve operational efficiency.Conclusions:The integration of administrative approaches with advanced technologies enables organizations to increase their adaptability, foster continuous innovation and achieve greater operational efficiency. This highlights the need to promote a collaborative culture and invest in technologies that enhance the flow of organizational knowledge in order to ensure sustainable and competitive performance Introducción: Este estudio examina cómo los enfoques del pensamiento administrativo pueden integrarse en la gestióndel conocimiento, con el fin de promover la innovación y mejorar la eficiencia operativa en organizaciones contemporáneas. Objetivo:Analizar estrategias administrativas que optimicen el aprovechamiento del conocimiento organizacional y destaquen su impacto en la innovación y el rendimiento empresarial. Metodología:Se realizó una revisión sistemática de literatura mediante el método PRISMA, recopilando estudios publicados entre 2019 y 2023 en las bases de datos ScienceDirect, SpringerLink y Emerald Insight. Se seleccionaron 27 artículos que exploran la relación entre pensamiento administrativo, la gestión del conocimiento, la innovación y la eficiencia operativa. Resultados:Los hallazgos muestran que estrategias colaborativas, como comunidades de prácticay aprendizaje, facilitan la creación y transferencia de conocimiento; mientras que herramientas tecnológicas, como los sistemas de gestión del conocimiento y el análisis de datos, optimizan la toma de decisiones y mejoran la eficiencia operativa. Conclusiones:La integración de enfoques administrativos con tecnologías avanzadas permite a las organizaciones incrementar su adaptabilidad, fomentar la innovación continua y alcanzar una mayor eficiencia operativa. Esto resalta la necesidad de promover una cultura colaborativa e invertir en tecnologías que potencien el flujo del conocimiento organizacional, con el fin de garantizar un desempeño sostenible y competitivo. Introdução: Este estudo examina como as abordagens do pensamento gerencial podem ser integradas à gestão do conhecimento, a fim de promover a inovação e melhorar a eficiência operacional nas organizações contemporâneas. Objetivo: Analisar estratégias gerenciais que otimizam o uso do conhecimento organizacional e destacam seu impacto na inovação e no desempenho empresarial. Metodologia: Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura utilizando o método PRISMA, coletando estudos publicados entre 2019 e 2023 nas bases de dados ScienceDirect, SpringerLink e Emerald Insight. Foram selecionados 27 artigos que exploram a relação entre pensamento gerencial, gestão do conhecimento, inovação e eficiência operacional. Resultados: Os resultados mostram que e

Suggested Citation

  • Darwin Daniel Ordoñez Iturralde, 2025. "The influence of administrative thinking in knowledge management and innovation: a systematic review," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 26(02), pages 272-294, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:021485
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.2526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/9627
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.2526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majid Zamiri & Ali Esmaeili, 2024. "Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.
    2. Alexandre André Feil & Dusan Schreiber & Claus Haetinger & Virgílio José Strasburg & Claudia Luisa Barkert, 2019. "Sustainability Indicators for Industrial Organizations: Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Reinking, Jeff & Arnold, Vicky & Sutton, Steve G., 2020. "Synthesizing enterprise data through digital dashboards to strategically align performance: Why do operational managers use dashboards?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    4. Daniel Mandel Gandrita, 2023. "Improving Strategic Planning: The Crucial Role of Enhancing Relationships between Management Levels," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Li, Yung-Ming & Jhang-Li, Jhih-Hua, 2010. "Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: A game theoretic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 1052-1064, December.
    6. Farzaneh, Mandana & Wilden, Ralf & Afshari, Leila & Mehralian, Gholamhossein, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 47-59.
    7. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    8. Muhammad Awais & Amanat Ali & Muhammad Sajid Khattak & Muhammad Irfanullah Arfeen & Muhammad Azam I. Chaudhary & Aleena Syed, 2023. "Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    9. Xiaoping Chen & Hongming Xie & Huanhuai Zhou, 2024. "Incremental versus Radical Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Dawit Udessa Gede & Admasu Tesso Huluka, 2023. "The impact of strategic alignment on organizational performance: The case of Ethiopian universities," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2247873-224, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386.
    2. Ankita Tandon & Unnikrishnan K. Nair, 2015. "Enactment of knowledge brokering: Agents, roles, processes and the impact of immersion," Working papers 183, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    3. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    4. Alvesson, Mats & Sveningsson, Stefan, 2011. "Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 349-361.
    5. Dupouet, Olivier & Yildizoglu, Murat, 2006. "Organizational performance in hierarchies and communities of practice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 668-690, December.
    6. Franke, Nikolaus & Shah, Sonali, 2003. "How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 157-178, January.
    7. Frédéric CREPLET, 2004. "Les Portails d’entreprise : une réponse aux dimensions de l’entreprise « processeur de connaissances »," Working Papers of BETA 2004-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    8. Kun Pu & Wei Liu, 2023. "Is absorptive capacity the "panacea" for organizational development? A META analysis of absorptive capacity and firm performance from the perspective of constructivism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Louie Rivers & Tamara Dempsey & Jade Mitchell & Carole Gibbs, 2015. "Environmental Regulation and Enforcement: Structures, Processes and the Use of Data for Fraud Detection," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    11. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    12. Cristina Páez-Avilés & Esteve Juanola-Feliu & Islam Bogachan-Tahirbegi & Mónica Mir & Manel González-Piñero & Josep Samitier, 2015. "Innovation And Technology Transfer Of Medical Devices Fostered By Cross-Disciplinary Communities Of Practitioners," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Monica Violeta Achim & Alexandra Ioana Daniela Rus & Nawazish Mirza, 2024. "How does intellectual capital spur innovation in economy? A cross-country survey," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3125-3154, December.
    14. Fioretti, Guido, 2009. "From men and machines to the organizational learning curve," MPRA Paper 19392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gyewan Moon & Suk Bong Choi & Shaikh Javed Fardin, 2016. "Organisational factors for effective knowledge sharing: an empirical study of Korean learning teams," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 102-120.
    16. Maarten B.T. de Groot & Oli R. Mihalache & Tom Elfring, 2022. "Toward a Theory of Family Social Capital in Wealthy Transgenerational Enterprise Families," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 159-192, January.
    17. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
    18. Victoria Vicario-Modroño & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos & Pedro Sánchez-Zamora, 2023. "Sustainability evaluation of olive oil mills in Andalusia (Spain): a study based on composite indicators," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6363-6392, July.
    19. Parjanen, Satu & Hyypiä, Mirva, 2019. "Innotin game supporting collective creativity in innovation activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 26-34.
    20. Mike Bartholomaei, 2005. "To Know is to Be: Three Perspectives on the Codification of Knowledge," SPRU Working Paper Series 131, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:021485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.