IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2017v4p217-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Performance In Organizations From Multi-Dimensional Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • STEFANESCU CRISTIAN

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA)

  • LOGOFATU MONICA

    (STUDENT UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA)

Abstract

In turbulent financial and economic present conditions a major challenge for the general management of organizations and in particular for the strategic human resources management is to establish a clear, coherent and consistent framework in terms of measuring organizational performance and economic efficiency. This paper aims to conduct an exploratory research of literature concerning measuring organizational performance. Based on the results of research the paper proposes a multi-dimensional model for measuring organizational performance providing a mechanism that will allow quantification of performance based on selected criteria. The model will attempt to eliminate inconsistencies and incongruities of organizational effectiveness models developed by specialists from organization theory area, performance measurement models developed by specialists from accounting management area and models of measuring the efficiency and effectiveness developed by specialists from strategic management and entrepreneurship areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanescu Cristian & Logofatu Monica, 2017. "Measuring Performance In Organizations From Multi-Dimensional Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 217-223, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2017:v:4:p:217-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2017-04/30_Stefanescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corina GAVREA & Liviu ILIEŞ & Roxana STEGEREAN, 2011. "Determinants Of Organizational Performance: The Case Of Romania," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(2), Summer.
    2. Gregory G. Dess & Richard B. Robinson, 1984. "Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 265-273, July.
    3. Claudiu George BOCEAN, 2011. "Project Based Organization - An Integrated Approach," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 265-273, November.
    4. Jaroslav Wagner, 2009. "Measuring Performance – Conceptual Framework Questions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 119-134.
    5. Catalina Soriana Sitnikov & Claudiu George Bocean, 2013. "Relationships among social and environmental responsibility and business," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 759-768, November.
    6. Kim S. Cameron, 1986. "Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 539-553, May.
    7. Brush, Candida G. & Vanderwerf, Pieter A., 1992. "A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 157-170, March.
    8. Balaji S. Chakravarthy, 1986. "Measuring strategic performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(5), pages 437-458, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian STEFANESCU & Monica LOGOFATU, 2018. "Development And Testing Of A Multi-Dimensional Model For Measuring General Organizational Performance," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 74-88, May.
    2. Stefanescu, Silviu Cristian, 2019. "Multi-dimensional model for measurement of the motivation level and its relationship with organizational performance," MPRA Paper 102400, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2020.
    3. Hu, Michael Y. & Chen, Haiyang, 1996. "An empirical analysis of factors explaining foreign joint venture performance in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 165-173, February.
    4. Khavul, Susanna & Pérez-Nordtvedt, Liliana & Wood, Eric, 2010. "Organizational entrainment and international new ventures from emerging markets," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 104-119, January.
    5. Gruber, Marc, 2007. "Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 782-807, November.
    6. Basco, Rodrigo & Pérez Rodríguez, María José, 2011. "Ideal types of family business management: Horizontal fit between family and business decisions and the relationship with family business performance," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 151-165.
    7. Domingo Soriano & Gary Castrogiovanni, 2012. "The impact of education, experience and inner circle advisors on SME performance: insights from a study of public development centers," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 333-349, April.
    8. Peterson, Robert A. & Crittenden, Victoria L., 2020. "Exploring customer orientation as a marketing strategy of Mexican-American entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 139-148.
    9. Samuel Afriyie & Jianguo Duo & Kingsley Appiah & Abdul-Aziz Ibn Musah, 2018. "The Nexus between Types of Innovation and Marketing Performance of SME in an Emerging Economy," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 78-92.
    10. Garry D. Bruton & Vance H. Fried & Robert D. Hisrich, 2000. "CEO Dismissal in Venture Capital-Backed Firms: Further Evidence from an Agency Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 69-77, July.
    11. Milfelner Borut & Gabrijan Vladimir & Snoj Boris, 2008. "Can Marketing Resources Contribute to Company Performance?," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 41(1), pages 3-13, January.
    12. Celestine Katongole & John C. Munene & Muhammed Ngoma & Samuel Dawa & Arthur Sserwanga, 2015. "Entrepreneur’s Intrapersonal Resources and Enterprise Success among Micro and Small Scale Women Entrepreneurs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 405-447, December.
    13. Anthony Abiodun Eniola & Harry Entebang, 2015. "Government Policy and Performance of Small and Medium Business Management," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 237-248, February.
    14. Fiedler, Marina & Welpe, Isabell M., 2010. "Antecedents of cooperative commercialisation strategies of nanotechnology firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 400-410, April.
    15. C. Chet Miller & Nathan T. Washburn & William H. Glick, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE—The Myth of Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 948-964, June.
    16. Harry J. Sapienza & Curtis M. Grimm, 1997. "Founder Characteristics, Start-Up Process, and Strategy/Structure Variables as Predictors of Shortline Railroad Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(1), pages 5-24, October.
    17. Roland Helm & Oliver Mauroner & Kendra Pöhlmann, 2018. "Towards a better understanding of performance measurements: the case of research-based spin-offs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 135-166, January.
    18. Glunk, U. & Wilderom, C.P.M., 1996. "Organizational Effectiveness = Corporate Performance? Why and How Two Research Traditions Need to be Merged," Research Memorandum 715, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Bruton, Garry D. & Rubanik, Yuri, 2002. "Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 553-576, October.
    20. Eugenio Zubeltzu-Jaka & Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez-Etxeberria, 2019. "Independent Directors and Organizational Performance: New Evidence from A Meta-Analytic Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2017:v:4:p:217-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.