IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/manmar/vxviy2018i1p74-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development And Testing Of A Multi-Dimensional Model For Measuring General Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian STEFANESCU

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • Monica LOGOFATU

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

Organizational performance can be evaluated from multiple perspectives, being a multifaceted phenomenon with multiple dimensions. Such a state create difficulties in the research of organizational performance because building of a theory on performance measurement involves the development and testing of a model to explain or predict a particular phenomenon based on a generalized model. Therefore, it is necessary a generally accepted unified view on organizational performance and to capture all of its dimensions. The combination of dimensions and organizational performance indicators illustrating these dimensions is a model of organizational performance measurement. In this work, it will be proposed and tested a model of organizational performance measurement on a pilot sample of companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange and will be validated based on empirical collected data.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian STEFANESCU & Monica LOGOFATU, 2018. "Development And Testing Of A Multi-Dimensional Model For Measuring General Organizational Performance," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 74-88, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xvi:y:2018:i:1:p:74-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mnmk.ro/documents/2018_01/5-1-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaroslav Wagner, 2009. "Measuring Performance – Conceptual Framework Questions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 119-134.
    2. Catalina Soriana Sitnikov & Claudiu George Bocean, 2013. "Relationships among social and environmental responsibility and business," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 759-768, November.
    3. Kim S. Cameron, 1986. "Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 539-553, May.
    4. Claudiu George BOCEAN, 2011. "Project Based Organization - An Integrated Approach," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 265-273, November.
    5. Brush, Candida G. & Vanderwerf, Pieter A., 1992. "A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 157-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanescu Cristian & Logofatu Monica, 2017. "Measuring Performance In Organizations From Multi-Dimensional Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 217-223, August.
    2. Stefanescu, Silviu Cristian, 2019. "Multi-dimensional model for measurement of the motivation level and its relationship with organizational performance," MPRA Paper 102400, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2020.
    3. Logofatu Monica & Stefanescu Cristian, 2017. "Performance In Organizations In A Human Resource Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 211-216, August.
    4. Per Davidsson & Scott Gordon, 2012. "Panel studies of new venture creation: a methods-focused review and suggestions for future research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 853-876, November.
    5. Andreas Kallmuenzer & Ursula Scholl-Grissemann, 2017. "Disentangling antecedents and performance effects of family SME innovation: A knowledge-based perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1117-1138, December.
    6. Zhi Yang & Xuemin Zhou & Pengcheng Zhang, 2015. "Discipline versus passion: Collectivism, centralization, and ambidextrous innovation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 745-769, September.
    7. Bürgel, Oliver & Fier, Andreas & Licht, Georg & Murray, Gordon & Nerlinger, Eric A., 1998. "The internationalisation of British and German start-up companies in high-technology industries," ZEW Discussion Papers 98-34, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Zahra, Shaker A., 1996. "Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 289-321, July.
    9. Petra Andries & Koenraad Debackere, 2007. "Adaptation and Performance in New Businesses: Understanding the Moderating Effects of Independence and Industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-99, June.
    10. Ieda Margarete Oro & Carlos Eduardo Facin Lavarda, 2017. "Interaction Between Strategy and Organizational Performance: The Influence of Family Management," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(5), pages 493-509, September.
    11. Lerner, Miri & Brush, Candida & Hisrich, Robert, 1997. "Israeli women entrepreneurs: An examination of factors affecting performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 315-339, July.
    12. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2013. "Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 234-244.
    13. Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 2020. "And yet, non-equity cooperative entries do improve international performance: uncovering the role of networks’ social capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 761-776, October.
    14. Masao Nakamura & Yannis Caloghirou & George Hondroyiannis & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2003. "The performance of research partnerships," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2-3), pages 85-99.
    15. Khavul, Susanna & Pérez-Nordtvedt, Liliana & Wood, Eric, 2010. "Organizational entrainment and international new ventures from emerging markets," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 104-119, January.
    16. Katerina Guba & Mikhail Sokolov & Angelika Tsivinskaya, 2020. "Fictitious Efficiency: What the Russian Survey of Performance of Higher Education Institutions Actually Assessed," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 97-125.
    17. Joseph LiPuma & Scott Newbert & Jonathan Doh, 2013. "The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies: a contingency model of firm age and size," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 817-841, May.
    18. Rosenbusch, Nina & Brinckmann, Jan & Bausch, Andreas, 2011. "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, July.
    19. Danut Ileana, 2015. "Strategic Social Responsibility In Public Sector. Case Of Romanian Gendarmerie," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 255-260, August.
    20. Lin, Shu-Jou & Lee, Ji-Ren, 2011. "Configuring a corporate venturing portfolio to create growth value: Within-portfolio diversity and strategic linkage," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 489-503, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational performance; measuring performance; multi-dimensional model; BSE;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xvi:y:2018:i:1:p:74-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Barbu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.