IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v69y2023i8id125-2023-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-frequency downside risk interconnectedness between soft agricultural commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Dejan Živkov

    (Novi Sad School of Business, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Boris Kuzman

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jonel Subić

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

In this article, we explore multiscale extreme risk interdependence between four soft agricultural markets - coffee, cocoa, cotton and orange juice. Wavelet correlation and cross-correlation are used to investigate this interlink, and dynamic conditional Value at Risk is used to measure extreme risk. Wavelet correlation results suggest a very weak connection between the markets in the short-term and midterm horizons, which means that investors who operate in the short term or midterm do not have to apply hedging measures against extreme risk. However, the situation is different in the long term, where relatively high correlations are found on the highest wavelet scale in all pairs, except coffee-cocoa. Complementary cross-correlation analysis indicates a lead-lag relationship between the markets. The results are mostly in line with expectations, as bigger markets lead smaller markets. Only in the cases of cocoa-cotton and cocoa-orange juice does the opposite happen.

Suggested Citation

  • Dejan Živkov & Boris Kuzman & Jonel Subić, 2023. "Multi-frequency downside risk interconnectedness between soft agricultural commodities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 332-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:69:y:2023:i:8:id:125-2023-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/125/2023-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/125/2023-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/125/2023-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/125/2023-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornelis Gardebroek & Manuel A. Hernandez & Miguel Robles, 2016. "Market interdependence and volatility transmission among major crops," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 141-155, March.
    2. J.E. Boscá & R. Doménech & J. Ferri & J.R. García & C. Ulloa, 2021. "The stabilizing effects of economic policies in Spain in times of COVID-19," Applied Economic Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(85), pages 4-20, January.
    3. Bonato, Matteo, 2019. "Realized correlations, betas and volatility spillover in the agricultural commodity market: What has changed?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 184-202.
    4. Zaghum Umar & Dennis Olson, 2022. "Strategic asset allocation and the demand for real estate: international evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2461-2513, May.
    5. Gema Fernández-Avilés & José-María Montero & Lidia Sanchis-Marco, 2020. "Extreme downside risk co-movement in commodity markets during distress periods: a multidimensional scaling approach," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(12), pages 1207-1237, August.
    6. Dejan Živkov & Jasmina Đurašković & Marina Gajić‐Glamočlija, 2022. "Multiscale downside risk interdependence between the major agricultural commodities," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 990-1011, October.
    7. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dejan Živkov & Jasmina Đurašković & Marina Gajić‐Glamočlija, 2022. "Multiscale downside risk interdependence between the major agricultural commodities," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 990-1011, October.
    2. Garcia-Jorcano, Laura & Sanchis-Marco, Lidia, 2022. "Spillover effects between commodity and stock markets: A SDSES approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Celina Löwen & Bilal Kchouri & Thorsten Lehnert, 2021. "Is this time really different? Flight-to-safety and the COVID-19 crisis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    5. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    6. Dominique Guégan & Wayne Tarrant, 2012. "On the necessity of five risk measures," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 533-552, November.
    7. Giovanni Masala & Filippo Petroni, 2023. "Drawdown risk measures for asset portfolios with high frequency data," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 265-289, June.
    8. Ke Zhou & Jiangjun Gao & Duan Li & Xiangyu Cui, 2017. "Dynamic mean–VaR portfolio selection in continuous time," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 1631-1643, October.
    9. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    10. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Alois Pichler, 2013. "Premiums And Reserves, Adjusted By Distortions," Papers 1304.0490, arXiv.org.
    12. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2013. "A comparison of the original and revised Basel market risk frameworks for regulating bank capital," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 249-268.
    13. Rockafellar, R.T. & Royset, J.O., 2010. "On buffered failure probability in design and optimization of structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 499-510.
    14. Li, Bo & Hou, Peng-Wen & Chen, Ping & Li, Qing-Hua, 2016. "Pricing strategy and coordination in a dual channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 154-168.
    15. Chanamart Intapan & Chukiat Chaiboonsri & Pairach Piboonrungroj, 2021. "Forecasting for the Optimal Numbers of COVID-19 Infection to Maintain Economic Circular Flows of Thailand," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Jin, Xin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Shi, Xiaoqiang & Ju, Wenbin, 2014. "A review on wind power industry and corresponding insurance market in China: Current status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1069-1082.
    17. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2012. "When more is less: Using multiple constraints to reduce tail risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2693-2716.
    18. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    19. Mínguez, R. & Conejo, A.J. & García-Bertrand, R., 2011. "Reliability and decomposition techniques to solve certain class of stochastic programming problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 314-323.
    20. Fattahi, Mohammad & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Kannan, Devika & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Resource planning strategies for healthcare systems during a pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 192-206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:69:y:2023:i:8:id:125-2023-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.