IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/but/ijebfa/v8y2018i1p81-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content Marketing Tools and Metrics in Consulting Firms: Preliminary Results

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Gabbianelli

    (Carlo Bo University of Urbino, Italy)

  • Emanuela Conti

    (Carlo Bo University of Urbino, Italy)

Abstract

The aim of this work is to identify the goals, tools, strategies, and metrics of Content Marketing (CM) used by European consulting firms to create value for the customer. The study adopts a quantitative methodology, in particular an online survey. A sample of 55 respondents was analyzed using descriptive statistics. CM is an activity used by 71% of the sample and is considered useful by 85% of respondents. The goals pursued with CM are mainly brand awareness and customer acquisition. The main platforms used for CM are LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. The tools most often adopted to achieve CM goals are website articles, social media content, and newsletters. The most used metrics are publishing and sharing. The small sample reduces the possibility to generalize the results. The results give some managerial implications such as: invest more in CM; use CM for maintaining contacts and increasing sales and use platforms like Instagram and YouTube; CM strategy planning. The study suggests a new CM definition which includes specific targets, the growing importance of digital tools and planned and systemic approach. This work is original as it is the first application of CM to consulting firms and contributes to the definition of CM.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Gabbianelli & Emanuela Conti, 2018. "Content Marketing Tools and Metrics in Consulting Firms: Preliminary Results," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 8(1), pages 81-99.
    • Handle: RePEc:but:ijebfa:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:81-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ijeb.faa.ro/download/538_6%20(18-17)%20-%20Gabbianelli%20Conti.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://ijeb.faa.ro/en/article/Content-Marketing-Tools-and-Metrics-in-Consulting-Firms-Preliminary-Results~538.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvesson, Mats & Empson, Laura, 2008. "The construction of organizational identity: Comparative case studies of consulting firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    3. Claudio Giachetti & Ettore Spadafora & Tiziano Bursi, 2013. "Internazionalizzazione, performance delle imprese e crisi economiche: i produttori di piastrelle di ceramica del distretto di Modena e Reggio Emilia," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(4), pages 37-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Joe Cox & Daniel Kaimann, 2013. "The Signaling Effect of Critics - Evidence from a Market for Experience Goods," Working Papers CIE 68, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    3. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    4. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    5. Yuanfang Lin & Amit Pazgal, 2016. "Hide Supremacy or Admit Inferiority—Market Entry Strategies in Response to Consumer Informational Needs," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(2), pages 94-103, June.
    6. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Reinhold Decker, 2014. "Real-Time Analysis of Online Product Reviews by Means of Multi-Layer Feed-Forward Neural Networks," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 60-70, November.
    8. Tingting Song & Jinghua Huang & Yong Tan & Yifan Yu, 2019. "Using User- and Marketer-Generated Content for Box Office Revenue Prediction: Differences Between Microblogging and Third-Party Platforms," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 191-203, March.
    9. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    10. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    11. Bövers, Jana & Hoon, Christina, 2021. "Surviving disruptive change: The role of history in aligning strategy and identity in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4).
    12. Giovanni Bernardo & Massimo Ruberti & Roberto Verona, 2022. "Image is everything! Professional football players' visibility and wages: evidence from the Italian Serie A," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 595-614, January.
    13. Guillaume Mercier & Ghislain Deslandes, 2020. "Formal and Informal Benevolence in a Profit-Oriented Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 125-143, August.
    14. Vimi Jham, 2023. "Filli Café: Experience Tea and Talk," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 20(1), pages 47-58, March.
    15. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. Caldieraro, Fabio & Cunha, Marcus, 2022. "Consumers’ response to weak unique selling propositions: Implications for optimal product recommendation strategy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 724-744.
    17. Sungsik Park & Woochoel Shin & Jinhong Xie, 2021. "The Fateful First Consumer Review," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 481-507, May.
    18. Yabing Jiang & Hong Guo, 2012. "Design of Consumer Review Systems and Product Pricing," Working Papers 12-10, NET Institute.
    19. Angela Aerry Choi & Daegon Cho & Dobin Yim & Jae Yun Moon & Wonseok Oh, 2019. "When Seeing Helps Believing: The Interactive Effects of Previews and Reviews on E-Book Purchases," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1164-1183, December.
    20. Li, Yimeng & Xiong, Yu & Mariuzzo, Franco & Xia, Senmao, 2021. "The underexplored impacts of online consumer reviews: Pricing and new product design strategies in the O2O supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:but:ijebfa:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:81-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faaubro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.