IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v11y2016i1p49-59n4.html

A Marxist Argumentative Scheme on Basic Income and Wage Share in an Anti-capitalist Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Manjarin Edgar

    (Department of Sociology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain)

  • Szlinder Maciej

    (Department of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

In this article, we present an anti-capitalist argument for basic income based on its predicted effects on the wage share dynamics and its relation with the working class’ bargaining power. Our considerations are located in the Marxist tradition and based mainly on contributions to the Marxist analytical framework made by Rosa Luxemburg and Michał Kalecki. We argue that basic income should lead to a rise of the share of wages in the GDP, by significantly improving workers’ bargaining position in various ways: through increasing the effective demand and investments by redistributing income to the advantage of the poorer groups of the society; through guaranteeing the realisation of basic needs outside the labour market; through positive influence on the collective bargaining power, especially during a strike; and through enhancing engagement in alternative relations of production as well as in political struggle for a better situation of working people. We also distinguish some necessary conditions in a realistic historical scenario where the positive, anti-capitalist dynamic launched by basic income could be set into motion.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjarin Edgar & Szlinder Maciej, 2016. "A Marxist Argumentative Scheme on Basic Income and Wage Share in an Anti-capitalist Agenda," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 49-59, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:49-59:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/bis-2016-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0010
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bis-2016-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1976. "Introduction [Santé]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 2(2), pages 144-146, Spring.
    2. Anonymous, 1976. "Introduction [Health]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 2(2), pages 141-143, Spring.
    3. Bhaduri, Amit & Marglin, Stephen, 1990. "Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(4), pages 375-393, December.
    4. Anonymous, 1976. "Introduction [Can Governments Govern?]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 2(4), pages 535-537, Autumn.
    5. Anonymous, 1976. "Introduction [The 1977 Bank Act]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 2(3), pages 368-369, Summer.
    6. Vanderborght Yannick, 2006. "Why Trade Unions Oppose Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    2. Norzihan Ayub & Rohany Nasir & Nor Ba¡¯yah Abdul Kadir & Mohd Suhaimi Mohamad, 2016. "Cognitive Behavioural Group Counselling in Reducing Anger and Aggression among Male Prison Inmates in Malaysia," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 263-273, January.
    3. Blasko, Matej & Netter, Jeffry M. & SinkeyJr., Joseph F., 2000. "Value creation and challenges of an international transaction The DaimlerChrysler merger," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 77-102, February.
    4. Karaman, Kamil KIvanç, 2009. "Decentralized coercion and self-restraint in provincial taxation: The Ottoman Empire, 15th-16th centuries," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 690-703, September.
    5. Khan, Shamshad, 2006. "Systems of medicine and nationalist discourse in India: Towards "new horizons" in medical anthropology and history," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2786-2797, June.
    6. Hector, Donald & Christensen, Carleton & Petrie, Jim, 2009. "A problem-structuring method for complex societal decisions: Its philosophical and psychological dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 693-708, March.
    7. Stead, Dominic, 2008. "Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 139-148, May.
    8. de la Maza, Francisca, 2016. "State conceptions of indigenous tourism in Chile," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 80-95.
    9. Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2000. "Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 447-475.
    10. Christian Schoder, 2012. "Effective demand, exogenous normal utilization and endogenous capacity in the long run. Evidence from a CVAR analysis for the US," IMK Working Paper 103-2012, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    11. Engelbert Stockhammer & Paul Ramskogler, 2009. "Post-Keynesian economics How to move forward," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 227-246.
    12. Eckhard Hein & Christian Schoder, 2011. "Interest rates, distribution and capital accumulation -- A post-Kaleckian perspective on the US and Germany," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 693-723, November.
    13. Marc Lavoie & Gabriel Rodriguez & Mario Seccareccia, 2004. "Similitudes and Discrepancies in Post-Keynesian and Marxist Theories of Investment: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 127-149.
    14. Jose Perez-Montiel & Carles Manera Erbina, 2020. "Erratum: Perez-Montiel, J.; Manera Erbina, C. Investment Sustained by Consumption: A Linear and Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11 , 4381," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-1, May.
    15. Engelbert Stockhammer & Rafael Wildauer, 2016. "Debt-driven growth? Wealth, distribution and demand in OECD countries," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(6), pages 1609-1634.
    16. Fabio Hideki Ono & José Luis Oreiro, 2004. "Technological Progress, Income Distribution And Capacity Utilisation: A Computer Simulation-Based Analysis," Anais do XXXII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 32nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 085, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    17. Clara Zanon Brenck, 2022. "Inequality, Debt Dynamics and the Incidence of Tax Rates: Addressing Macroeconomic Instability in a Post Keynesian Model," Working Papers 2212, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    18. José Raúl Luyando Cuevas & Julio Herrera Revuelta, 2018. "Distribución funcional del ingreso y régimen de crecimiento en México y Espana," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 37(73).
    19. Armon Rezai, 2011. "The Political Economy Implications of General Equilibrium Analysis in Open Economy Macro Models," Working Papers 1111, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    20. Eric Kemp‐Benedict, 2020. "Convergence of actual, warranted, and natural growth rates in a Kaleckian–Harrodian‐classical model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 851-881, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:49-59:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.