IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v29y2012i2p163-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Cooperation a Panacea? The Effect of Cooperative Response to Task Conflict on Team Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen‐Jiao Chen
  • Xin Qin
  • Douglas Vogel

Abstract

Task conflict is unavoidable, and cooperation is widely adopted to manage task conflict within work teams. Prior studies demonstrated that the effects of cooperative response to task conflict on team performance can be positive or none. To explain the inconsistent effects, based on cooperation and competition theory, this study explores how and when cooperative response to task conflict increases team performance. Seventy‐one work teams from Chinese organizations responded to a survey. Results show that knowledge integration mediates the positive effect of cooperative response to task conflict on team performance. More interestingly, need for cognition and resource interdependence moderate the aforementioned mediating process in such a way that cooperative response increases team performance through knowledge integration only when need for cognition is high or when resource interdependence is high. Finally, theoretical and managerial implications are discussed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen‐Jiao Chen & Xin Qin & Douglas Vogel, 2012. "Is Cooperation a Panacea? The Effect of Cooperative Response to Task Conflict on Team Performance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 163-178, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:2:p:163-178
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Cremer, David & Tyler, Tom R. & Ouden, Nathalie den, 2005. "Managing cooperation via procedural fairness: The mediating influence of self-other merging," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 393-406, June.
    2. Evans, Martin G., 1985. "A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 305-323, December.
    3. Mamata Bhandar & Shan‐Ling Pan & Bernard C.Y. Tan, 2007. "Towards understanding the roles of social capital in knowledge integration: A case study of a collaborative information systems project," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(2), pages 263-274, January.
    4. Gerardo A. Okhuysen & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2002. "Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 370-386, August.
    5. Lionel P. Robert & Alan R. Dennis & Manju K. Ahuja, 2008. "Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 314-334, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yixuan Wang & Bowen Jiang, 2018. "Modular and Integral Knowledge Integration: From the Case of a Chinese IT Enterprise," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Caroline Sargis-Roussel & François Deltour, 2012. "Beyond cross-functional teams: knowledge integration during organizational projects and the role of social capital," Post-Print hal-00787480, HAL.
    3. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    4. Sherry E. Moss & Meng Song & Sean T. Hannah & Zhen Wang & John J. Sumanth, 2020. "The Duty to Improve Oneself: How Duty Orientation Mediates the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Feedback-Seeking and Feedback-Avoiding Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 615-631, September.
    5. Tanja Rabl & María Carmen Triana & Seo-Young Byun & Laura Bosch, 2020. "Diversity Management Efforts as an Ethical Responsibility: How Employees’ Perceptions of an Organizational Integration and Learning Approach to Diversity Affect Employee Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 531-550, January.
    6. Nurmohamed, Samir & Kundro, Timothy G. & Myers, Christopher G., 2021. "Against the odds: Developing underdog versus favorite narratives to offset prior experiences of discrimination," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 206-221.
    7. Lifeng Zhong & Zhichao Qian & Dongdong Wang, 2020. "How does the servant supervisor influence the employability of postgraduates? Exploring the mechanisms of self-efficacy and academic engagement," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Khansa, Lara & Liginlal, Divakaran, 2012. "Whither information security? Examining the complementarities and substitutive effects among IT and information security firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 271-281.
    9. Matthias Graf & Sebastian Schuh & Niels Quaquebeke & Rolf Dick, 2012. "The Relationship Between Leaders’ Group-Oriented Values and Follower Identification with and Endorsement of Leaders: The Moderating Role of Leaders’ Group Membership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 301-311, March.
    10. Leung, Kwok & Wang, Zhongming & Hon, Alice H.Y., 2011. "Moderating effects on the compensation gap between locals and expatriates in China: A multi-level analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 54-67, March.
    11. Jing Wang & Jay In Oh, 2023. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Intentions on TikTok: An Examination from the Uses and Gratifications (U&G) Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Federico Contu & Daniela Di Santo & Conrad Baldner & Antonio Pierro, 2023. "Examining the Interaction between Perceived Cultural Tightness and Prevention Regulatory Focus on Life Satisfaction in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-10, January.
    13. Isaac Waisberg & Andrew Nelson, 2018. "When the General Meets the Particular: The Practices and Challenges of Interorganizational Knowledge Reuse," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 432-448, June.
    14. Gerald C. Kane & Jeremiah Johnson & Ann Majchrzak, 2014. "Emergent Life Cycle: The Tension Between Knowledge Change and Knowledge Retention in Open Online Coproduction Communities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 3026-3048, December.
    15. Jarrod Haar & Anja Schmitz & Annamaria Di Fabio & Urs Daellenbach, 2019. "The Role of Relationships at Work and Happiness: A Moderated Moderated Mediation Study of New Zealand Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Hofman, Erwin & Halman, Johannes I.M. & Looy, Bart van, 2016. "Do design rules facilitate or complicate architectural innovation in innovation alliance networks?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1436-1448.
    17. Mateja Drnovsek & Daniel Ortqvist & Joakim Wincent, 2010. "The effectiveness of coping strategies used by entrepreneurs and their impact on personal well-being and venture performance," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 28(2), pages 193-220.
    18. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek & Frank Roche & Aidan Kelly, 2009. "Decision Comprehensiveness and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Role of Managerial Uncertainty Preferences and Environmental Dynamism," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1289-1314, December.
    19. Jalees, Tariq & Tariq, Huma & Zaman, Syed Imran & Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain, 2015. "Social Media in Virtual Marketing," MPRA Paper 69868, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Apr 2015.
    20. Panagopoulos, Nikolaos G. & Avlonitis, George J., 2010. "Performance implications of sales strategy: The moderating effects of leadership and environment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-57.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:2:p:163-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.