IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v12y2020i6p1273-1285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The informal sector and Covid‐19 economic impacts: The case of Bahia, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos
  • Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro
  • Rodrigo Barbosa de Cerqueira

Abstract

This paper aims to simulate the economic impacts of the withdrawal of informal workers from the labour market due to the social isolation policy implemented during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Bahia state, Brazil, where 66% of workers work in the informal sector. We also consider the government income compensation policy to make up part of their income. The partial hypothetical extraction method was used in a regional input–output matrix, base year 2012 with 42 economic sectors. Our simulations show that the withdrawal of informal workers decreases the productive capacity and leads to strong negative impacts on the economy, mainly in the service sectors. On the other hand, the income compensation policy mitigates the negative impacts by about 50%. Moreover, the public administration is the least impacted sector because it is mostly made up of formal workers. Este artículo tiene por objeto simular las repercusiones económicas de la retirada del mercado de trabajo de los trabajadores del sector informal debido a la política de aislamiento social impuesta durante la pandemia de COVID‐19 en el estado de Bahía de Brasil, en el que el 66% de los trabajadores trabajan en el sector informal. También se estudió la política de compensación de ingresos del gobierno como contribución a los ingresos de los trabajadores. Se utilizó el método de extracción hipotética parcial en una matriz regional de input‐output, usando 2012 como año base con 42 sectores económicos. Las simulaciones muestran que la retirada de los trabajadores del sector informal disminuye la capacidad productiva y conduce a fuertes impactos negativos en la economía, principalmente en los sectores de servicios. Por otro lado, la política de compensación de ingresos mitiga los impactos negativos en un 50% aproximadamente. Además, la administración pública es el sector menos afectado porque está compuesto en su mayor parte por trabajadores del sector formal. ブラジルのバイア州では労働者の66%がインフォーマルセクターで働いているが、本稿では、新型コロナウイルス感染症 (COVID‐19)大流行時に実施された社会的隔離政策によるインフォーマル労働者の労働市場からの撤退の経済的影響をシミュレートする。また、政府が彼らの所得の一部を補償する所得補償政策を考察する。2012年を基準とし、42の経済セクターを対象とした地域の産業連関マトリクスで、部分的仮説的抽出を行った。シミュレーションから、インフォーマル労働者の撤退が生産能力を低下させ、主にサービスセクターの経済に強いマイナスの影響をもたらすことが示された。一方、所得補償政策はマイナスの影響を約50%緩和する。さらに、行政は、大部分が正規労働者で構成されているため、最も影響を受けにくいセクターである。

Suggested Citation

  • Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos & Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro & Rodrigo Barbosa de Cerqueira, 2020. "The informal sector and Covid‐19 economic impacts: The case of Bahia, Brazil," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 1273-1285, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:1273-1285
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12366
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Fana & Sergio Torrejón Pérez & Enrique Fernández-Macías, 2020. "Employment impact of Covid-19 crisis: from short term effects to long terms prospects," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(3), pages 391-410, September.
    2. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bob van Burken & Yasushi Kondo, 2019. "Hypothetical extractions from a global perspective," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 505-519, October.
    3. R Maria del Rio-Chanona & Penny Mealy & Anton Pichler & François Lafond & J Doyne Farmer, 0. "Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: an industry and occupation perspective," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 94-137.
    4. Antoine Mandel & Vipin Veetil, 2020. "The Economic Cost of COVID Lockdowns: An Out-of-Equilibrium Analysis," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 431-451, October.
    5. Wang, Yuan & Wang, Wenqin & Mao, Guozhu & Cai, Hua & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Lili & Zhao, Peng, 2013. "Industrial CO2 emissions in China based on the hypothetical extraction method: Linkage analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1238-1244.
    6. Yue-Jun Zhang & Xiao-Juan Bian & Weiping Tan, 2018. "The linkages of sectoral carbon dioxide emission caused by household consumption in China: evidence from the hypothetical extraction method," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1743-1775, June.
    7. R Maria del Rio-Chanona & Penny Mealy & Anton Pichler & François Lafond & J Doyne Farmer, 2020. "Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: an industry and occupation perspective," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 94-137.
    8. Erik Dietzenbacher & Michael L. Lahr, 2013. "Expanding Extractions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 341-360, September.
    9. Jill Juergensen & José Guimón & Rajneesh Narula, 2020. "European SMEs amidst the COVID-19 crisis: assessing impact and policy responses," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(3), pages 499-510, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arceo-Gomez, Eva O. & Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M. & Esquivel, Gerardo & Alcaraz, Eduardo & Martinez, Luis A. & Lopez, Norma G., 2023. "The impact of COVID-19 infection on labor outcomes of Mexican formal workers," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    2. Teurai Rwafa-Ponela & Susan Goldstein & Petronell Kruger & Agnes Erzse & Safura Abdool Karim & Karen Hofman, 2022. "Urban Informal Food Traders: A Rapid Qualitative Study of COVID-19 Lockdown Measures in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Augusto Mussi Alvim & Miguel Atienza & Adelar Fochezatto, 2021. "The subnational supply chain and the COVID‐19 pandemic: Short‐term impacts on the Brazilian regional economy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(S1), pages 158-186, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giammetti, Raffaele & Papi, Luca & Teobaldelli, Désirée & Ticchi, Davide, 2022. "The optimality of age-based lockdown policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 722-738.
    2. Severin Reissl & Alessandro Caiani & Francesco Lamperti & Mattia Guerini & Fabio Vanni & Giorgio Fagiolo & Tommaso Ferraresi & Leonardo Ghezzi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini, 2022. "Assessing the Economic Impact of Lockdowns in Italy: A Computational Input–Output Approach [Nonlinear Production Networks with an Application to the Covid-19 Crisis]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(2), pages 358-409.
    3. Chen, Zhenni & Liu, Xi & Li, Jianglong, 2022. "Identifying channels of environmental impacts of transport sector through sectoral linkage analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Severin Reissl & Alessandro Caiani & Francesco Lamperti & Tommaso Ferraresi & Leonardo Ghezzi, 2022. "A regional Input-Output model of the Covid-19 crisis in Italy: decomposing demand and supply factors," LEM Papers Series 2022/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Florian Horky & Nicola Tretter & Jarko Fidrmuc, 2021. "Are the pandemic and innovation twins? Perceived financial obstacles, innovations, and entrepreneurial success," Economic Research Guardian, Weissberg Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 236-254, December.
    6. Terrie Walmsley & Adam Rose & Dan Wei, 2021. "The Impacts of the Coronavirus on the Economy of the United States," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-52, April.
    7. Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Augusto Mussi Alvim & Miguel Atienza & Adelar Fochezatto, 2021. "The subnational supply chain and the COVID‐19 pandemic: Short‐term impacts on the Brazilian regional economy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(S1), pages 158-186, November.
    8. Katsuhiro Sakurai & Hiroyuki Shibusawa, 2021. "The economic impact of the inland water fisheries/aquaculture industry: The case of the eel industry in Japan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 1729-1749, December.
    9. George, Ammu & Li, Changtai & Lim, Jing Zhi & Xie, Taojun, 2021. "From SARS to COVID-19: The evolving role of China-ASEAN production network," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Marco Bottone & Cristina Conflitti & Marianna Riggi & Alex Tagliabracci, 2021. "Firms' inflation expectations and pricing strategies during Covid-19," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 619, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    11. Donato Masciandaro, 2020. "Covid-19 Helicopter Money, Monetary Policy And Central Bank Independence: Economics And Politics," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 20137, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    12. D'Orazio, Paola & Dirks, Maximilian W., 2020. "COVID-19 and financial markets: Assessing the impact of the coronavirus on the eurozone," Ruhr Economic Papers 859, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    13. Marco Dueñas & Mercedes Campi & Luis E. Olmos, 2021. "Changes in mobility and socioeconomic conditions during the COVID-19 outbreak," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Torsten Heinrich, 2021. "Epidemics in modern economies," Chemnitz Economic Papers 045, Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology, revised May 2021.
    15. repec:arp:sjefsm:2021:p:64-80 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Nano Prawoto & Eko Priyo Purnomo & Abitassha Az Zahra, 2020. "The Impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic on Socio-Economic Mobility in Indonesia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 57-71.
    17. Brinca, Pedro & Duarte, Joao B. & Faria-e-Castro, Miguel, 2021. "Measuring labor supply and demand shocks during COVID-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Antoine Mandel & Vipin Veetil, 2020. "The Economic Cost of COVID Lockdowns: An Out-of-Equilibrium Analysis," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 431-451, October.
    19. Marcos Deuñas & Mercedes Campi & Luis Olmos, 2020. "Changes in mobility and socioeconomic conditions in Bogotá city during the COVID-19 outbreak," Working Papers 30, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    20. Thomas Gries & Wim Naudé, 2021. "Extreme Events, Entrepreneurial Start-Ups, and Innovation: Theoretical Conjectures," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 329-353, October.
    21. Alvaro Espitia & Aaditya Mattoo & Nadia Rocha & Michele Ruta & Deborah Winkler, 2022. "Pandemic trade: COVID‐19, remote work and global value chains," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 561-589, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:1273-1285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.