IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v39y2022i5p602-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fueling green connections: Networked policy instrument choices for sustainability regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ishani Mukherjee

Abstract

This paper presents a policy network analysis study that examines policy subsystem interconnectedness and cohesion, to explore three constituent regulatory policy instruments that have a combined impact on governing sustainability. The network surrounding the environmental sustainability of biodiesel policy in Indonesia is marked by high interconnectedness and relatively weaker cohesion, properties that impact how policy solutions are formulated through policy actor interactions and define prevailing policy formulation styles. Using primary policy network data on 46 organizations and the review of national regulations, laws, and directives, this paper tests established hypotheses on how instruments that are formulated within the same policy subsystem, share similar characteristics. While overall network interconnectedness and cohesion are important first indicators of policy instrument selection in the literature on policy design, this article recommends also including an examination of network centrality and the characteristics of dominant central actors who are in favorable positions to design policies, to better accommodate for different policy formulation styles. Este documento presenta un estudio de análisis de red de políticas que examina la interconexión y cohesión de los subsistemas de políticas, para explorar tres instrumentos de políticas regulatorias constituyentes que tienen un impacto combinado en la gobernanza de la sostenibilidad. La red que rodea la sustentabilidad ambiental de la política de biodiesel en Indonesia está marcada por una alta interconexión y una cohesión relativamente más débil, propiedades que afectan la forma en que se formulan las soluciones políticas a través de las interacciones de los actores políticos y definen los estilos de formulación de políticas predominantes. Usando datos primarios de la red de políticas sobre 46 organizaciones y la revisión de regulaciones, leyes y directivas nacionales, este documento prueba hipótesis establecidas sobre cómo los instrumentos que se formulan dentro del mismo subsistema de políticas comparten características similares. Si bien la interconexión y cohesión general de la red son importantes primeros indicadores de la selección de instrumentos de política en la literatura sobre diseño de políticas, este artículo recomienda incluir también un examen de la centralidad de la red y las características de los actores centrales dominantes que están en posiciones favorables para diseñar políticas, para adaptarse mejor para diferentes estilos de formulación de políticas. 本文提出一项政策网络分析研究, 对政策子系统的互联性和凝聚力加以分析, 以探究对治理可持续性产生综合影响的三种监管政策工具。围绕印度尼西亚生物柴油政策的环境可持续性的网络以高度互联性和相对较弱的凝聚力为特征, 这些特征会影响政策解决方案如何通过政策行动者的相互影响而形成, 并定义普遍的政策制定风格。通过使用关于46个组织的政策网络的原始数据, 并审视国家规制、法律及指令, 本文检验了一系列假设, 后者有关于同一政策子系统内制定的工具如何具有相似特征。尽管整体的网络互联性和凝聚力是政策设计文献中政策工具选择的首要指标, 但本文建议对网络中心性和占主导地位的中心行动者(能帮助设计政策)的特征加以分析, 以更好地适应不同的政策制定风格。

Suggested Citation

  • Ishani Mukherjee, 2022. "Fueling green connections: Networked policy instrument choices for sustainability regulation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 602-631, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:39:y:2022:i:5:p:602-631
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12479
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ishani Mukherjee & Michael Howlett, 2016. "An Asian perspective on policy instruments: policy styles, governance modes and critical capacity challenges," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 24-42, March.
    2. Metz, Florence & Leifeld, Philip & Ingold, Karin, 2019. "Interdependent policy instrument preferences: a two-mode network approach," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 609-636, December.
    3. Zhou, Adrian & Thomson, Elspeth, 2009. "The development of biofuels in Asia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(Supplemen), pages 11-20, November.
    4. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2008. "Asian energy and environmental policy: Promoting growth while preserving the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3905-3924, October.
    5. Freeman, Gary P., 1985. "National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 467-496, October.
    6. Giliberto Capano & Michael Howlett, 2020. "The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    7. Sorda, Giovanni & Banse, Martin & Kemfert, Claudia, 2010. "An overview of biofuel policies across the world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6977-6988, November.
    8. Kelvin Chan & Jay Liebowitz, 2006. "The synergy of social network analysis and knowledge mapping: a case study," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 19-35.
    9. Michael Howlett, 2009. "Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(1), pages 73-89, February.
    10. Koizumi Tatsuji & Ohga Keiji, 2007. "Biofuels Policies in Asian Countries: Impact of the Expanded Biofuels Programs on World Agricultural Markets," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Kivimaa, Paula & Kern, Florian, 2016. "Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 205-217.
    12. Linder, Stephen H. & Peters, B. Guy, 1989. "Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 35-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils C. Bandelow & Johanna Hornung, 2022. "How communities and policy instruments govern sustainability," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 538-540, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anat Gofen & Adam M. Wellstead & Noa Tal, 2023. "Devil in the details? Policy settings and calibrations of national excellence-centers," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 301-323, June.
    2. Ishani Mukherjee & M. Kerem Coban & Azad Singh Bali, 2021. "Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 243-268, June.
    3. Hilde Nykamp, 2020. "Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Lorenz Kammermann & Karin Ingold, 2019. "Going beyond technocratic and democratic principles: stakeholder acceptance of instruments in Swiss energy policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 43-65, March.
    5. Clemente J. Navarro-Yáñez, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Integral Urban Strategies: Policy Theory and Target Scale. The European URBAN I Initiative and Employment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Casula, Mattia & Toth, Federico, 2021. "The 2017 Italian reform on mandatory childhood vaccinations: Analysis of the policy process and early implementation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 7-11.
    7. Trotter, Philipp A. & Brophy, Aoife, 2022. "Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    8. Schillo, R. Sandra & Isabelle, Diane A. & Shakiba, Abtin, 2017. "Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 126-137.
    9. Ishani Mukherjee, 2021. "Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘Compounds’: a renewable energy policy perspective [Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: The missing link between ," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 312-332.
    10. Giliberto Capano & Michael Howlett, 2020. "The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    11. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2012. "Necessity of biodiesel utilization as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5732-5740.
    12. Naimeh Mohammadi & Hamid Mostofi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2023. "Policy Chain of Energy Transition from Economic and Innovative Perspectives: Conceptual Framework and Consistency Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    13. Acciai, Claudia, 2021. "The politics of research and innovation: Understanding instrument choices in complex governance environments – the case of France and Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    14. Kamal Soundararajan & Elspeth Thomson, 2013. "Asia and European transport biofuels stalled at the same place?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 247-263, September.
    15. Lilibeth A. Acosta & Damasa B. Magcale-Macandog & K. S. Kavi Kumar & Xuefeng Cui & Elena A. Eugenio & Paula Beatrice M. Macandog & Arnold R. Salvacion & Jemimah Mae A. Eugenio, 2016. "The Role of Bioenergy in Enhancing Energy, Food and Ecosystem Sustainability Based on Societal Perceptions and Preferences in Asia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    16. Jeroen Candel & Carsten Daugbjerg, 2020. "Overcoming the dependent variable problem in studying food policy," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(1), pages 169-178, February.
    17. Azad Singh Bali & Michael Howlett & Jenny M Lewis & M Ramesh, 2021. "Procedural policy tools in theory and practice [The stick, the carrot, and other strategies: A theoretical analysis of governmental intervention]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 295-311.
    18. Edrisi, Sheikh Adil & Dubey, Rama Kant & Tripathi, Vishal & Bakshi, Mansi & Srivastava, Pankaj & Jamil, Sarah & Singh, H.B. & Singh, Nandita & Abhilash, P.C., 2015. "Jatropha curcas L.: A crucified plant waiting for resurgence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 855-862.
    19. Kumar, S. & Shrestha, Pujan & Abdul Salam, P., 2013. "A review of biofuel policies in the major biofuel producing countries of ASEAN: Production, targets, policy drivers and impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 822-836.
    20. Erica Reeve & Amerita Ravuvu & Anna Farmery & Senoveva Mauli & Dorah Wilson & Ellen Johnson & Anne-Marie Thow, 2022. "Strengthening Food Systems Governance to Achieve Multiple Objectives: A Comparative Instrumentation Analysis of Food Systems Policies in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:39:y:2022:i:5:p:602-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.