IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/presci/v100y2021i5p1230-1253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the impact of ride‐hailing firms on urban congestion: The case of Uber in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier Fageda

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Uber, the world's largest ride‐hailing firm, on congestion. Drawing on data from European cities for the period 2008 through 2016, I find a negative impact of Uber on congestion. The estimated impact in the baseline regression is −3.5 percentage points, but it is higher in cities that do not impose strong regulatory restrictions to ride‐hailing services. In addition, the negative impact of Uber on congestion is only statistically significant in denser cities. The Uber effect is gradual given that its impact increases over time. Finally, I find suggestive evidence that the potential endogeneity bias underestimates the negative effect of Uber on congestion. Este documento explora el impacto de Uber, la mayor empresa de servicios de reserva de taxis del mundo, en la congestión de tráfico. A partir de datos de ciudades europeas para el período 2008 a 2016, se encontró un impacto negativo de Uber en la congestión de tráfico. El impacto estimado en la regresión de referencia es de –3,5 puntos porcentuales, pero es mayor en las ciudades que no imponen fuertes restricciones normativas a los servicios de reserva de taxis. Además, el impacto negativo de Uber en la congestión de tráfico sólo es estadísticamente significativo en las ciudades más densas. El efecto de Uber es gradual, ya que su impacto aumenta con el tiempo. Por último, se encontró evidencia que sugiere que el sesgo potencial de endogeneidad subestima el efecto negativo de Uber sobre la congestión de tráfico. 本稿では、世界最大の配車サービス会社であるUberの渋滞への影響を検討する。2008~2016年の欧州の都市のデータから、Uberが渋滞に悪影響を与えていることを発見した。ベースライン回帰で推定した影響は、−3.5%ポイントであるが、配車サービスに強い規制を課していない都市ではもっと高い値がみられる。さらに、渋滞に対するUberの負の影響は、人口密度の高い都市においてのみ統計的に有意である。Uberの影響は、時間の経過とともに大きくなるものであり、徐々に拡大するものである。また、潜在的な内生性バイアスが、Uberの渋滞に対する負の効果を過小評価することを示唆するエビデンスが認められる。

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier Fageda, 2021. "Measuring the impact of ride‐hailing firms on urban congestion: The case of Uber in Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(5), pages 1230-1253, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:100:y:2021:i:5:p:1230-1253
    DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12607
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pirs.12607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    2. Judd Cramer & Alan B. Krueger, 2016. "Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 177-182, May.
    3. Albalate, Daniel & Fageda, Xavier, 2021. "On the relationship between congestion and road safety in cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 145-152.
    4. Brodeur, Abel & Nield, Kerry, 2018. "An empirical analysis of taxi, Lyft and Uber rides: Evidence from weather shocks in NYC," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-16.
    5. Ian W. H. Parry & Margaret Walls & Winston Harrington, 2007. "Automobile Externalities and Policies," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 373-399, June.
    6. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769.
    7. Beaudoin, Justin & Farzin, Y. Hossein & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2015. "Public transit investment and sustainable transportation: A review of studies of transit's impact on traffic congestion and air quality," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 15-22.
    8. Hall, Jonathan D. & Palsson, Craig & Price, Joseph, 2018. "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-50.
    9. Hung-Hao Chang, 2017. "The Economic Effects Of Uber On Taxi Drivers In Taiwan," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 475-500.
    10. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    11. Nelson Erik & Sadowsky Nicole, 2019. "Estimating the Impact of Ride-Hailing App Company Entry on Public Transportation Use in Major US Urban Areas," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Su, Qing, 2010. "Travel demand in the US urban areas: A system dynamic panel data approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 110-117, February.
    13. Peter Cohen & Robert Hahn & Jonathan Hall & Steven Levitt & Robert Metcalfe, 2016. "Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber," NBER Working Papers 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Flor & Armando Ortuño & Begoña Guirao, 2022. "Does the Implementation of Ride-Hailing Services Affect Urban Road Safety? The Experience of Madrid," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junhong Chu & Yige Duan & Xianling Yang & Li Wang, 2021. "The Last Mile Matters: Impact of Dockless Bike Sharing on Subway Housing Price Premium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 297-316, January.
    2. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    3. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Aguilera-García, Álvaro & Gomez, Juan & Velázquez, Guillermo & Vassallo, Jose Manuel, 2022. "Ridesourcing vs. traditional taxi services: Understanding users’ choices and preferences in Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 161-178.
    5. John M. Barrios & Yael Hochberg & Hanyi Yi, 2020. "The Cost of Convenience: Ridehailing and Traffic Fatalities," NBER Working Papers 26783, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Tarduno, Matthew, 2021. "The congestion costs of Uber and Lyft," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Yue Guo & Fu Xin & Xiaotong Li, 2020. "The market impacts of sharing economy entrants: evidence from USA and China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 629-649, September.
    8. Lam, Chungsang Tom & Liu, Meng & Hui, Xiang, 2021. "The geography of ridesharing: A case study on New York City," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Sutirtha Bagchi, 2018. "A Tale of Two Cities: An Examination of Medallion Prices in New York and Chicago," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(2), pages 295-319, September.
    10. Daniel Albalate & Xavier Fageda, 2022. ""Have Low Emission Zones slowed urban traffic recovery after Covid-19?"," IREA Working Papers 202222, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Dec 2022.
    11. Jindong Pang & Shulin Shen, 2023. "Do ridesharing services cause traffic congestion?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 520-552, May.
    12. Yongwook Paik & Christos A. Makridis, 2023. "The social value of a ridesharing platform: a hedonic pricing approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 2125-2150, May.
    13. Maximilian Schäfer & Kevin Ducbao Tran, 2020. "Airbnb, Hotels, and Localized Competition," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1889, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Minkyu Shin & Jiwoong Shin & Soheil Ghili & Jaehwan Kim, 2023. "The Impact of the Gig Economy on Product Quality Through the Labor Market: Evidence from Ridesharing and Restaurant Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2620-2638, May.
    15. Guilherme Mendes Resende & Ricardo Carvalho de Andrade Lima, 2018. "Working Paper No. 001/2018 - Competition Effects of the Sharing Economy in Brazil: Has Uber's entry affected the cab-hailing app market from 2014 to 2016?," Documentos de Trabalho 2018011, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.
    16. Kyung Sun (Melissa) Rhee & Jinyang Zheng & Youwei Wang & Yong Tan, 2023. "Value of Information Sharing via Ride-Hailing Apps: An Empirical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1228-1244, September.
    17. Rick Grahn & Sean Qian & H. Scott Matthews & Chris Hendrickson, 2021. "Are travelers substituting between transportation network companies (TNC) and public buses? A case study in Pittsburgh," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 977-1005, April.
    18. Alina Garnham & Derek Stacey, 2021. "Fighting for Fares: Uber and the Declining Market Price of Licensed Taxicabs," Working Papers 21001, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2022.
    19. Barreto, Yuri & Silveira Neto, Raul da Mota & Carazza, Luis, 2021. "Uber and traffic safety: Evidence from Brazilian cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Leon Moskatel & David Slusky, 2019. "Did UberX reduce ambulance volume?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 817-829, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:100:y:2021:i:5:p:1230-1253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1056-8190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.