IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v13y2017i3p475-500..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Effects Of Uber On Taxi Drivers In Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-Hao Chang

Abstract

The ridesharing economy has caught a great deal of attention from researchers and policymakers. However, due to the dearth of available data, not much empirical evidence has been provided. This article empirically assesses the economic impact of Uber service on taxi drivers’ business performance using a case study in Taiwan as an illustration. A difference-in-difference model is estimated using a population-based dataset of 29,434 taxi drivers. The results indicate that Uber reduced regular taxi drivers’ service revenue by approximately 12 percent in the initial year and 18 percent in the third year of entry of Uber. This result may suggest a substitution relationship between Uber service and taxi operation. Moreover, the negative impact of Uber is more pronounced among taxi motorcade members, which may indicate that Uber competes with taxi passengers who usually use an electronic device to call for ride service. By further looking at the capacity utilization and operating miles, it is evident that the negative impacts of Uber on taxi drivers’ service revenue are more likely associated with the reduction in operating miles of taxi drivers. To cope with competition from Uber, taxi drivers are more likely to have advertisements in or on the taxicab and to provide better ride service.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-Hao Chang, 2017. "The Economic Effects Of Uber On Taxi Drivers In Taiwan," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 475-500.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:13:y:2017:i:3:p:475-500.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhx017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wells, Peter & Wang, Xiaobei & Wang, Liqiao & Liu, Haokun & Orsato, Renato, 2020. "More friends than foes? The impact of automobility-as-a-service on the incumbent automotive industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Xavier Fageda, 2021. "Measuring the impact of ride‐hailing firms on urban congestion: The case of Uber in Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(5), pages 1230-1253, October.
    3. Hung‐Hao Chang & D. Daniel Sokol, 2022. "How incumbents respond to competition from innovative disruptors in the sharing economy—The impact of Airbnb on hotel performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 425-446, March.
    4. Oliveira, Cristiano Aguiar de & Machado, Gabriel Costeira, 2021. "A note on the impact of Uber on Brazilian taxi drivers' earnings," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 75(3), December.
    5. Aleksandr Ključnikov & Boris Popesko & Jitka Kloudová, 2019. "Economics of the international ridesharing services - a trap for amateurs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1172-1181, March.
    6. Silva, João Marcos Soares da & Lima, Ricardo Carvalho de Andrade, 2022. "Is Netflix a threat to the cable TV industry? Evidence from Brazil," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3).
    7. Kim, Kibum & Baek, Chulwoo & Lee, Jeong-Dong, 2018. "Creative destruction of the sharing economy in action: The case of Uber," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 118-127.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:13:y:2017:i:3:p:475-500.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.