IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v30y2021i9p2962-2992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Bilevel Resource Recovery Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Xiong
  • Shuming Wang
  • Tsan Sheng Ng

Abstract

In this study, we consider a resource recovery planning problem under a public–private partnership. The local authority's problem is to determine the waste sorting scheme, and also a cost‐sharing budget, to minimize her expected payout, subject to a requirement of economic feasibility of the private operator. Given the budget and sorting scheme, the private operator's problem is to site and operate resource recovery facilities, and his goal is to maximize his expected total profits. A salient feature of the problem is that the feedstock condition (composition and volume) is uncertain, but can be influenced by the sorting‐at‐source scheme implemented. This feature drives the interactions of the public and private partners. We develop a bilevel resource recovery planning model in the framework of distributionally robust optimization, where a decision‐dependent ambiguity set is defined to model the influence of sorting schemes on the feedstock uncertainty. We perform the model analysis on the cost‐share ratio, which suggests the importance of sorting investment in achieving the sustainable resource recovery. Computationally, we show that the solutions of the bilevel problem can be obtained by solving one instance of a mixed‐integer linear program that does not induce any additional integer variable. Our proposed optimization framework provides a useful decision‐analysis tool for effectively utilizing and balancing the instruments of sorting and facility installation investments for resource recovery planning under feedstock ambiguity. For instance, the computational experiments with partial real data in the Singapore context justify several important insights: (i) the suitable sorting scheme implementation serves as a cost‐effective instrument that could significantly enhance the utility of the cost sharing; (ii) the sorting dependency of feedstock condition is critical in affecting the private operator's recovery performance; and (iii) the robust planning is effective in hedging against ambiguously poor feedstock condition. These findings should deserve attentions of both public and private sectors in current waste management practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Xiong & Shuming Wang & Tsan Sheng Ng, 2021. "Robust Bilevel Resource Recovery Planning," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 2962-2992, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:9:p:2962-2992
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gülpınar, Nalan & Pachamanova, Dessislava & Çanakoğlu, Ethem, 2013. "Robust strategies for facility location under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 21-35.
    2. Zetina, Carlos Armando & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François & Nikbakhsh, Ehsan, 2017. "Robust uncapacitated hub location," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 393-410.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Xiong, Jie & Ng, Tsan Sheng Adam & Wang, Shuming, 2016. "An optimization model for economic feasibility analysis and design of decentralized waste-to-energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 239-251.
    5. Sun, Wei & Huang, Guo H. & Lv, Ying & Li, Gongchen, 2013. "Inexact joint-probabilistic chance-constrained programming with left-hand-side randomness: An application to solid waste management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 217-225.
    6. Eiselt, H.A. & Marianov, Vladimir, 2014. "A bi-objective model for the location of landfills for municipal solid waste," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 187-194.
    7. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Nie, X.H. & Nie, S.L., 2008. "A two-stage fuzzy robust integer programming approach for capacity planning of environmental management systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 399-420, September.
    8. Gambella, Claudio & Maggioni, Francesca & Vigo, Daniele, 2019. "A stochastic programming model for a tactical solid waste management problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 684-694.
    9. Alireza Sharafi & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Mohsen Sadegh Amalnick, 2018. "Fair Allocation in Financial Disputes Between Public–Private Partnership Stakeholders Using Game Theory," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, March.
    10. James D. Reschovsky & Sarah E. Stone, 1994. "Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 120-139.
    11. Youngkyu Kim & Inha Oh & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2015. "Economic Impact Assessment Of Public–Private Matching Fund Programs Using Firm-Level Data," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 60(04), pages 1-25.
    12. A P Antunes & J C Teixeira & M S Coutinho, 2008. "Managing solid waste through discrete location analysis: A case study in central Portugal," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(8), pages 1038-1046, August.
    13. Michel-Alexandre Cardin & Qihui Xie & Tsan Sheng Ng & Shuming Wang & Junfei Hu, 2017. "An approach for analyzing and managing flexibility in engineering systems design based on decision rules and multistage stochastic programming," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    15. Caruso, C. & Colorni, A. & Paruccini, M., 1993. "The regional urban solid waste management system: A modelling approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 16-30, October.
    16. Shuming Wang & Tsan Sheng Ng & Manyu Wong, 2016. "Expansion planning for waste‐to‐energy systems using waste forecast prediction sets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 47-70, February.
    17. Baris Ata & Deishin Lee & Mustafa H. Tongarlak, 2012. "Optimizing Organic Waste to Energy Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 231-244, April.
    18. Efraim Sadka, 2007. "Public-Private Partnerships: A Public Economics Perspective," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, vol. 53(3), pages 466-490, September.
    19. Phillips,David A., 2001. "Implementing the market approach to enterprise support - an evaluation of ten matching grant schemes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2589, The World Bank.
    20. Liu, Yongchao & Xu, Huifu & Yang, Shu-Jung Sunny & Zhang, Jin, 2018. "Distributionally robust equilibrium for continuous games: Nash and Stackelberg models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 631-643.
    21. Larry Jenkins, 1982. "Parametric Mixed Integer Programming: An Application to Solid Waste Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(11), pages 1270-1284, November.
    22. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    23. Erkut, Erhan & Karagiannidis, Avraam & Perkoulidis, George & Tjandra, Stevanus A., 2008. "A multicriteria facility location model for municipal solid waste management in North Greece," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1402-1421, June.
    24. Jie Xiong & Tsan Sheng Ng & Zhou He & Bo Fan, 2017. "Modelling and analysis of a symbiotic waste management system," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5355-5377, September.
    25. Yuan, H.P. & Shen, L.Y. & Hao, Jane J.L. & Lu, W.S., 2011. "A model for cost–benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 604-612.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yun Hui Lin & Qingyun Tian & Yanlu Zhao, 2022. "Locating facilities under competition and market expansion: Formulation, optimization, and implications," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 3021-3042, July.
    2. Jia, Ruru & Gao, Jinwu & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Robust ocean zoning for conservation, fishery and marine renewable energy with co-location strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuming Wang & Tsan Sheng Ng & Manyu Wong, 2016. "Expansion planning for waste‐to‐energy systems using waste forecast prediction sets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 47-70, February.
    2. Tianqi Liu & Francisco Saldanha-da-Gama & Shuming Wang & Yuchen Mao, 2022. "Robust Stochastic Facility Location: Sensitivity Analysis and Exact Solution," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2776-2803, September.
    3. He, Zhou & Xiong, Jie & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Fan, Bo & Shoemaker, Christine A., 2017. "Managing competitive municipal solid waste treatment systems: An agent-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 1063-1077.
    4. Xuejie Bai & Yankui Liu, 2016. "Robust optimization of supply chain network design in fuzzy decision system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1131-1149, December.
    5. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    6. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.
    7. Hao Yu & Wei Deng Solvang, 2017. "A multi-objective location-allocation optimization for sustainable management of municipal solid waste," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 289-308, September.
    8. Jang, Hoon & Hwang, Kyosang & Lee, Taeho & Lee, Taesik, 2019. "Designing robust rollout plan for better rural perinatal care system in Korea," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 730-742.
    9. Gambella, Claudio & Maggioni, Francesca & Vigo, Daniele, 2019. "A stochastic programming model for a tactical solid waste management problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 684-694.
    10. Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Ryan, Sarah M. & Kabir, Elnaz, 2016. "Hybrid robust and stochastic optimization for closed-loop supply chain network design using accelerated Benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 76-92.
    11. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Liu, Ronghui, 2022. "A two-stage robust approach to integrated station location and rebalancing vehicle service design in bike-sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 915-938.
    12. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    13. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Robust optimization on redundancy allocation problems in multi-state and continuous-state series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    14. Hasani, Aliakbar & Khosrojerdi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-52.
    15. Enrico Bartolini & Dominik Goeke & Michael Schneider & Mengdie Ye, 2021. "The Robust Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows Under Knapsack-Constrained Travel Time Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 371-394, March.
    16. Sara Mattia & Michael Poss, 2018. "A comparison of different routing schemes for the robust network loading problem: polyhedral results and computation," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 753-800, April.
    17. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    18. Taozeng Zhu & Jingui Xie & Melvyn Sim, 2022. "Joint Estimation and Robustness Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1659-1677, March.
    19. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:9:p:2962-2992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.