IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v57y2026i2ne70144.html

From Agglomeration to Breakthrough Innovation: The Role of Firm Clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyu Li
  • Lin Hu
  • Liping Li
  • Hengyan Liu

Abstract

Breakthrough innovation (BI) is vital for overcoming technological barriers and enhancing economic resilience. Firm clustering (FC) may shape innovation by improving firms' access to and use of external knowledge. Although many studies have examined clustering effects at the city and industry levels, evidence at the firm level remains limited. Using data from the Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database combined with geocoded information, this study investigates the impact of FC on BI. The results show that FC significantly promotes BI, though the effect attenuates with geographic distance and clustering in adjacent regions can inhibit local BI. Mechanism analysis indicates that FC functions by improving the information environment and facilitating knowledge spillovers. Heterogeneity analysis further shows stronger effects in smaller firms, industries with rapid technological change, regions with better connectivity, and more diversified clustering environments. These findings deepen our understanding of clustering economies and provide policy insights for advancing regional innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyu Li & Lin Hu & Liping Li & Hengyan Liu, 2026. "From Agglomeration to Breakthrough Innovation: The Role of Firm Clustering," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:2:n:e70144
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70144
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Kobarg & Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim & Christopher Schlägel & Isabell M. Welpe, 2020. "Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 953-990, October.
    2. Song Wang & Dailing Hou & Yan Liu & Xueli Wang & Liang Dai, 2024. "Can urban agglomeration policy improve the innovation efficiency of cities in China?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(12), pages 2449-2467, December.
    3. Russell Golman & Steven Klepper, 2016. "Spinoffs and clustering," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(2), pages 341-365, May.
    4. Seong K. Byun & Jong-Min & Han Xia, 2021. "Incremental vs. Breakthrough Innovation: The Role of Technology Spillovers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1779-1802, March.
    5. Lopez-Vega, Henry & Tell, Fredrik & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2016. "Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 125-136.
    6. Gary Gereffi & Joonkoo Lee, 2016. "Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains and Industrial Clusters: Why Governance Matters," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 25-38, January.
    7. Stefano Breschi & Francesco Lissoni, 2009. "Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 439-468, July.
    8. Wang, Jian & Sun, Furong & Lv, Kangjuan & Wang, Lisha, 2022. "Industrial agglomeration and firm energy intensity: How important is spatial proximity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Aharonson, Barak S. & Schilling, Melissa A., 2016. "Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 81-96.
    10. Xu, Shengxiang & Chen, Hsinghung & Dong, Shuli & Guo, Zizheng, 2023. "Can upgrading information infrastructure improve the innovation ability of companies? Empirical evidence from China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    11. Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2013. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1347-1393, July.
    12. Brandily, P. & Rauch, F., 2024. "Within‐city roads and urban growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122580, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Hongbin Cai & Qiao Liu, 2009. "Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(537), pages 764-795, April.
    14. Colin Davis & Yasunobu Tomoda, 2018. "Competing incremental and breakthrough innovation in a model of product evolution," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 225-247, April.
    15. Guo, Meng & Luo, Danglun & Liu, Chen, 2024. "City civilization, employment creation and talent agglomeration: Empirical evidence from “National Civilized City” policy in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Lia Sheer, 2021. "Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(3), pages 871-898, March.
    17. Stuart S. Rosenthal & William C. Strange, 2020. "How Close Is Close? The Spatial Reach of Agglomeration Economies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 27-49, Summer.
    18. Mark A Chen & Qinxi Wu & Baozhong Yang, 2019. "How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 2062-2106.
    19. Li, Peiyu & Zhou, Hanmei & Liu, Xinzhi & Li, Liping, 2026. "Does public data openness reduce boundary pollution? Evidence from interprovincial neighboring cities in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Peiyu Li & Liping Li & Xinzhi Liu & Hanmei Zhou, 2026. "Market integration in the digital era: can public data openness break market segmentation?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 1-43, March.
    21. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    22. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    23. Huang, Donglan & Xu, Guoteng & Li, Chengjiang & Yang, Shu, 2025. "Effects of high-tech industrial agglomeration and innovation on regional economic development in China: Evidence from spatial-temporal analysis and Spatial Durbin Model," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 692-712.
    24. Stefano Breschi, 2000. "The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 213-229.
    25. Shengnan Wu & Yang Yang & Xueliang Zhang, 2025. "Polycentric Spatial Structure, Agglomeration, and Urban Innovation," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 139-159, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wai, Sebastian, 2023. "Inventor mobility and spillovers in the early semiconductor industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Pan Yu & Gaoju Yang & Hangyu Chen, 2025. "Does cooperative research affect firms’ technology spillovers? Evidence from China," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1225-1248, December.
    3. Marques, André M., 2022. "Is income inequality good or bad for growth? Further empirical evidence using data for all Brazilian cities," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 360-376.
    4. Niu, Wenju & Shen, Houcai, 2022. "Investment in process innovation in supply chains with knowledge spillovers under innovation uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1128-1141.
    5. Glaeser, Stephen & Lang, Mark, 2024. "Measuring innovation and navigating its unique information issues: A review of the accounting literature on innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    6. Yuanqi Li & Zhuo Li & Ting Liu, 2024. "Does university-industry collaboration improve firm productivity? Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Wang, Xiaoquan & Wu, Qi & Zhang, Hong, 2025. "The role of social ties in spreading innovation: Evidence from alien merchant guilds in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    8. Fan Zou & Yan Dong & Sining Song & Manus Rungtusanatham, 2023. "Product Recalls and Supply Base Innovation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1931-1946, September.
    9. Haichao Yu & Shangze Dai & Haiqian Ke, 2024. "Industrial collaborative agglomeration and green economic efficiency—Based on the intermediary effect of technical change," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.
    10. Becker, Bettina & Roper, Stephen & Vanino, Enrico, 2023. "Assessing innovation spillovers from publicly funded R&D and innovation support: Evidence from the UK," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Guido Pialli, 2023. "The effects of limited exhaustibility of knowledge and geographical distance on the quality of R&D collaborations: The European evidence 2000–2012," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1125-1169, September.
    12. Wang, Lisha & Pan, Minjie & Qian, Xinlei & Lv, Kangjuan, 2025. "Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Bogang Jun & Aamena Alshamsi & Jian Gao & Cesar A Hidalgo, 2017. "Relatedness, Knowledge Diffusion, and the Evolution of Bilateral Trade," Papers 1709.05392, arXiv.org.
    14. Ana Abras & Guilherme G. C. Mattos, 2021. "Get Them While They Are Young," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 59(1), pages 97-113, April.
    15. Wajid Ali & Cristina Brasili & Pinuccia P. Calia, 2026. "Cohesion Policy and Institutional Quality Impact: Does Urban–Rural Classification Matter?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1001-1027, May.
    16. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    17. Pardy, Martina, 2025. "Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127983, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Li, Xing & Chen, Xi & Hou, Keqiang, 2024. "FDI technology spillovers in Chinese supplier-customer networks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Dennis Gaus & Georg Hirte, 2023. "Agglomeration or Market Access? The Defining Factors of Firms' Location Choice," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2045, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Liping Fu & Fan Wu & Shan Zhang, 2022. "Evolutionary Path and Innovative Development of Pharmaceutical Industrial Cluster—A Case Study of Shijiazhuang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:2:n:e70144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.