IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v20y2021i3p4-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Role Can Agricultural Policies Play in Encouraging Healthier Diets?

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Brooks
  • Céline Giner

Abstract

Over the past twenty years, the effects of agricultural policies on nutrition have received increasing attention from policymakers. A major reason is a worsening epidemic of overweight and obesity that, on top of persistent hunger and undernutrition, has alarming consequences for public health. Excessive calorie consumption and unbalanced diets underpin this trend. Agricultural production fundamentally responds to, rather than drives, final food demands. However, some aspects of structural change within the sector, in particular productivity‐led price declines for energy dense food staples, may be contributing to over‐consumption and unbalanced diets. Agricultural policies that lower the prices of basic food commodities, in particular support for productivity enhancing investments, may reinforce that structural tendency. Yet productivity growth also improves poor people’s access to affordable food and will be essential for sustainable production growth. Prices cannot be used to achieve multiple and often competing policy goals or as the primary lever to arbitrate among them. Ultimately, the challenge for policymakers is to provide effective choices to consumers, and change dietary habits and customs, so that consumers limit their consumption of any product or specific ingredient to healthy amounts at any given price level. Au cours des vingt dernières années, les décideurs de l’action publique ont porté une attention croissante aux effets des politiques agricoles sur la nutrition. L'une des principales raisons est l'aggravation de l'épidémie de surpoids et d'obésité qui, en plus de la persistance de la faim et de la malnutrition, a des conséquences alarmantes pour la santé publique. Une consommation excessive de calories et une alimentation déséquilibrée sont à l’origine de cette tendance. La production agricole répond fondamentalement à la demande alimentaire finale plutôt qu'elle ne la stimule. Cependant, certains aspects du changement structurel au sein du secteur, en particulier les baisses de prix induites par la productivité des aliments de base à forte densité énergétique, peuvent contribuer à la surconsommation et aux régimes alimentaires déséquilibrés. Les politiques agricoles qui abaissent les prix des produits alimentaires de base, en particulier le soutien aux investissements améliorant la productivité, peuvent renforcer cette tendance structurelle. Pourtant, la croissance de la productivité améliore également l'accès des pauvres à une alimentation abordable et sera essentielle pour une croissance durable de la production. Les prix ne peuvent pas être utilisés pour atteindre des objectifs politiques multiples et souvent concurrents ou comme levier principal pour arbitrer entre eux. En fin de compte, le défi pour les décideurs de l’action publique est d'offrir aux consommateurs des choix réels et de changer les habitudes et usages alimentaires, afin que les consommateurs limitent leur consommation de tout produit ou ingrédient spécifique à des quantités bénéfiques à la santé, pour un niveau de prix donné. In den letzten zwanzig Jahren erhielten die Auswirkungen der Agrarpolitik auf die Ernährung immer mehr Aufmerksamkeit von der Politik. Einer der Hauptgründe dafür liegt in dem starken Anstieg an Übergewicht und Adipositas, der zusätzlich zu anhaltendem Hunger und Unterernährung bedenkliche Folgen für das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen hat. Übermäßige Kalorienzufuhr und unausgewogene Ernährungsweisen untermauern diesen Trend. Die landwirtschaftliche Erzeugung reagiert im Wesentlichen auf die Nachfrage nach Lebensmitteln, anstatt sie zu beeinflussen. Einige Aspekte des Strukturwandels im Agrarsektor, insbesondere der produktivitätsbedingte Preisverfall bei kalorienreichen Grundnahrungsmitteln, können jedoch zu einem übermäßigen Verzehr und zu einer unausgewogenen Ernährung beitragen. Agrarpolitische Maßnahmen, die eine Absenkung der Preise für Grundnahrungsmittel bewirken, vor allem die Förderung von produktivitätssteigernden Investitionen, können diese strukturelle Tendenz noch verstärken. Doch Produktivitätssteigerungen verbessern auch den Zugang armer Bevölkerungsgruppen zu preiswerten Lebensmitteln und werden für ein nachhaltiges Produktionswachstum unerlässlich sein. Preise dürfen allerdings nicht dazu benutzt werden, um mehrere und oft miteinander konkurrierende politische Ziele zu erreichen. Sie sollten auch nicht als zentraler Hebel dienen, um zwischen den verschiedenen Zielen zu vermitteln. Letztlich liegt die Herausforderung für die Politik darin, Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern echte Wahlmöglichkeiten zu bieten und ihre Ernährungsgewohnheiten zu verändern. Und zwar dahingehend, dass sie den Konsum eines Produkts oder einer bestimmten Zutat auf eine gesunde Menge bei einem bestimmten Preisniveau beschränken.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Brooks & Céline Giner, 2021. "What Role Can Agricultural Policies Play in Encouraging Healthier Diets?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(3), pages 4-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:3:p:4-11
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12322
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marion Devaux & Franco Sassi, 2015. "The Labour Market Impacts of Obesity, Smoking, Alcohol Use and Related Chronic Diseases," OECD Health Working Papers 86, OECD Publishing.
    2. Céline Giner & Jonathan Brooks, 2019. "Policies for encouraging healthier food choices," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 137, OECD Publishing.
    3. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    4. Olivia Placzek, 2021. "Socio-economic and demographic aspects of food security and nutrition," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 150, OECD Publishing.
    5. Julian M. Alston & Daniel A. Sumner & Stephen A. Vosti, 2006. "Are Agricultural Policies Making Us Fat? Likely Links between Agricultural Policies and Human Nutrition and Obesity, and Their Policy Implications ," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 313-322.
    6. Ben Henderson & Jussi Lankoski, 2019. "Evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural policies," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 130, OECD Publishing.
    7. Franco Sassi & Jeremy Hurst, 2008. "The Prevention of Lifestyle-Related Chronic Diseases: an Economic Framework," OECD Health Working Papers 32, OECD Publishing.
    8. W. Bruce Traill, 2012. "Economic Perspectives on Nutrition Policy Evaluation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 505-527, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Brooks, 2023. "Agricultural policies and food systems: Priorities for indicator development," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 3-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Brooks, 2023. "Agricultural policies and food systems: Priorities for indicator development," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 3-23, February.
    2. Nadja Frate & Brigitte Jenull & Robert Birnbacher, 2019. "Like Father, Like Son. Physical Activity, Dietary Intake, and Media Consumption in Pre-School-Aged Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Bonnet, Céline & Requillart, Vincent, 2010. "Is The Eu Sugar Policy Reform Likely To Increase Obesity?," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116414, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Beghin, John C. & Jensen, Helen H., 2008. "Farm policies and added sugars in US diets," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 480-488, December.
    6. Movedi, Ermes & Valiante, Daniele & Colosio, Alessandro & Corengia, Luca & Cossa, Stefano & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2022. "A new approach for modeling crop-weed interaction targeting management support in operational contexts: A case study on the rice weeds barnyardgrass and red rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    7. Wang, Linlin & Li, Qiang & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Xie, Junhong & Luo, Zhuzhu & Zhang, Renzhi & Deng, Xiping & Li, Linglin, 2020. "Winter wheat yield and water use efficiency response to organic fertilization in northern China: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Lucia Mancini, 2013. "Conventional, Organic and Polycultural Farming Practices: Material Intensity of Italian Crops and Foodstuffs," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Daniel P. Roberts & Autar K. Mattoo, 2018. "Sustainable Agriculture—Enhancing Environmental Benefits, Food Nutritional Quality and Building Crop Resilience to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. John Davis, 2018. "Communicating Economic Concepts and Research in a Challenging Environment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 591-605, September.
    11. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Seck, Abdoulaye & Thiam, Djiby Racine, 2022. "Understanding consumer attitudes to and valuation of organic food in Sub-Saharan Africa: A double-bound contingent method applied in Dakar, Senegal," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(1), March.
    13. Schindele, Stephan & Trommsdorff, Maximilian & Schlaak, Albert & Obergfell, Tabea & Bopp, Georg & Reise, Christian & Braun, Christian & Weselek, Axel & Bauerle, Andrea & Högy, Petra & Goetzberger, Ado, 2020. "Implementation of agrophotovoltaics: Techno-economic analysis of the price-performance ratio and its policy implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Sadowski, Arkadiusz & Wojcieszak-Zbierska, Monika Małgorzata & Zmyślona, Jagoda, 2024. "Agricultural production in the least developed countries and its impact on emission of greenhouse gases – An energy approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Lusk, Jayson & Magnier, Alexandre, 2018. "The price of non-genetically modified (non-GM) food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 38-50.
    16. Julian M. Alston & Joanna P. MacEwan & Abigail M. Okrent, 2016. "Effects of U.S. Public Agricultural R&D on U.S. Obesity and its Social Costs," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 492-520.
    17. Janet MacFall & Joanna Lelekacs & Todd LeVasseur & Steve Moore & Jennifer Walker, 2015. "Toward resilient food systems through increased agricultural diversity and local sourcing in the Carolinas," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 608-622, December.
    18. Cash, Sean B. & Lacanilao, Ryan D., 2007. "Taxing Food to Improve Health: Economic Evidence and Arguments," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 174-182, October.
    19. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    20. SIngh Verma, Juhee & Sharma, Pritee, 2019. "Potential of Organic Farming to Mitigate Climate Change and Increase Small Farmers’ Welfare," MPRA Paper 99994, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:3:p:4-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.