IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v91y2024i362p497-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do wages underestimate the inequality in workers' rewards? The joint distribution of job quality and wages across occupations

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew E. Clark
  • Maria Cotofan
  • Richard Layard

Abstract

Information on both wages and job quality is needed in order to understand the occupational dispersion of wellbeing. We analyse subjective wellbeing in a large UK sample to construct a measure of ‘overall reward’, the sum of wages and the value of job quality, in 90 different occupations. If only wages are included, then labour market inequality is underestimated: the dispersion of overall rewards is one‐third larger than the dispersion of wages. Our findings are similar, and stronger, in data on US workers. We find a positive correlation between job quality and wages in all specifications, both between individuals in the cross‐section and within individuals in panel data. The gender and ethnic gaps in the labour market are larger than those in wages alone, and the overall rewards to education on the labour market are underestimated by earnings differentials alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew E. Clark & Maria Cotofan & Richard Layard, 2024. "Do wages underestimate the inequality in workers' rewards? The joint distribution of job quality and wages across occupations," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(362), pages 497-546, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:91:y:2024:i:362:p:497-546
    DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12516
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecca.12516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:91:y:2024:i:362:p:497-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.