IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i3p2533-2545.html

How do the perception of the technological and symbolic dimensions and the social context affect the green consumer adoption process of eco‐innovations?

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Cubillas‐Para
  • Eva Tomaseti‐Solano
  • Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro

Abstract

Environmental challenges have led to a shift toward more sustainable consumption and production patterns. Understanding the factors that influence consumers' choices toward green products is crucial for achieving sustainable development. This study investigates the adoption process of a low‐involvement eco‐innovation, examining the influence of the level of green consumerism, the perception of its technological and symbolic dimensions, social pressure, and social conspicuousness. A sample of 268 observations was examined using the PLS‐SEM methodology. The results highlightthe indirect effect of the level of green consumption on low‐involvement eco‐innovation adoption through the perception of its technological and symbolic dimensions, as well as social pressure and social conspicuousness. These findings have important practical implications for the design of marketing strategies aimed at promoting low‐involvement eco‐innovations. By emphasizing the social benefits and the influence of others on adopting green behaviors, marketers can effectively target consumers and facilitate the transition toward more sustainable consumption patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Cubillas‐Para & Eva Tomaseti‐Solano & Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro, 2024. "How do the perception of the technological and symbolic dimensions and the social context affect the green consumer adoption process of eco‐innovations?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2533-2545, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:2533-2545
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3614
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronnie Cheung & Aris Y.C. Lam & Mei Mei Lau, 2015. "Drivers of green product adoption: the role of green perceived value, green trust and perceived quality," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 232-245, June.
    2. Candi, Marina & Jae, Haeran & Makarem, Suzanne & Mohan, Mayoor, 2017. "Consumer responses to functional, aesthetic and symbolic product design in online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 31-39.
    3. Cappetta, Rossella & Cillo, Paola & Ponti, Anna, 2006. "Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1273-1290, November.
    4. Gulzari, Adeela & Wang, Yuchen & Prybutok, Victor, 2022. "A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    6. Tenenhaus, Michel & Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito & Chatelin, Yves-Marie & Lauro, Carlo, 2005. "PLS path modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 159-205, January.
    7. Moon, HyungBin & Park, Stephen Youngjun & Woo, JongRoul, 2021. "Staying on convention or leapfrogging to eco-innovation?: Identifying early adopters of hydrogen-powered vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Shang, Dawei & Wu, Weiwei & Schroeder, Daniel, 2023. "Exploring determinants of the green smart technology product adoption from a sustainability adapted value-belief-norm perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    10. Suki, Norazah Mohd & Suki, Norbayah Mohd & Afshan, Sahar & Sharif, Arshian & Meo, Muhammad Saeed, 2022. "The paradigms of technological innovation and renewables as a panacea for sustainable development: A pathway of going green," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1431-1439.
    11. Paul, Justin & Modi, Ashwin & Patel, Jayesh, 2016. "Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 123-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Rajdeep Kumar Raut & Rohit Kumar, 2023. "Do Values Predict Socially Responsible Investment Decisions? Measuring the Moderating Effects of Gender," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 22(2), pages 189-214, June.
    3. Yu‐Min Wang & Wan‐Ching Chiu & Chung‐Lun Wei & Hsing‐Hsien Wang & Jih‐Hua Yang & Yi‐Shun Wang, 2024. "What drives consumers' intention to purchase self‐driving cars," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 1773-1792, June.
    4. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Joey F George & Rui Chen & Lingyao Yuan, 2021. "Intent to purchase IoT home security devices: Fear vs privacy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    7. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    8. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    9. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    10. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    11. Sanjeev Verma, 2015. "Harnessing the Benefit of Social Networking Sites for Intentional Social Action: Determinants and Challenges," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 104-111, June.
    12. Dalal Bamufleh, 2023. "Modelling the Acceptance and Use of Electronic Medical Records from Patients’ Point of View: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Ritu Agarwal & V. Sambamurthy & Ralph M. Stair, 2000. "Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 418-430, December.
    15. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    16. Liu, Xin & Wu, Jiaqi & Zhang, Chenghu, 2025. "Antecedents of consumers' acceptance of central bank digital currency: The role of technology perceptions, social influence and personal traits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Oguz YILDIZ & Hakan KITAPCI, 2018. "Exploring Factors Affecting Consumers¡¯ Adoption of Shopping via Mobile Applications in Turkey," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 60-75, June.
    18. Sajjad, Aqsa & Zhang, Qingyu & Asmi, Fahad & Anwar, Muhammad Azfar & Bhatia, Meena, 2024. "Identifying the motivating factors to promote socially responsible consumption under circular economy: A perspective from norm activation theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Xiaocheng Vicky Zhang & Suk Ha Grace Chan, 2021. "Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Chao Wu & Shuling Liang & Weijiong Wu & Yuxiang Hong, 2021. "Practicing Green Residence Business Model Based on TPB Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:2533-2545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.