IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v4y2019i2p24-38id843.html

Influence Of Organizational Structure On M-Commerce Performance In Kenya'S Commercial Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Doreen Muriu

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to explore the influence of organizational structure on Mobile-Commerce (M-Commerce) performance in Kenya's commercial banks. Methodology: The study adopted a positivism research philosophy and descriptive research design. The technique used was stratified random sampling. A sample of 133 managers from a target population of 200 was picked. Structured questionnaires were used to collect the required data. For data collection procedure, the researcher recruited research assistants who dropped and picked the questionnaires from the banks. Findings The study findings indicated that, path coefficient value was 0.237, thus the relationship between organizational structure and m-commerce performance was positive and significant (t = 3.553, p =0.000). The study correlated organizational structure and m-commerce performance and found that organizational structure and m-commerce were positively and significantly related at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Unique Contribution to theory, practice and policy: Organizational structure is very important in enabling improved performance of m-commerce The study recommends that banks modify their structures to support strategy implementation. This result showed that m-commerce performance or growth increased with a supportive structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Doreen Muriu, 2019. "Influence Of Organizational Structure On M-Commerce Performance In Kenya'S Commercial Banks," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 4(2), pages 24-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:24-38:id:843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/article/view/843
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Grant, 1996. "Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 375-387, August.
    2. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    3. Tomac Cater & Danijel Pucko, 2010. "Factors of effective strategy implementation: Empirical evidence from Slovenian business practice," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(3), pages 207-236.
    4. Olson, Eric M. & Slater, Stanley F. & Hult, G. Tomas M., 2005. "The importance of structure and process to strategy implementation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 47-54.
    5. Wright, Peter & Mukherji, Ananda & Kroll, Mark J., 2001. "A reexamination of agency theory assumptions: extensions and extrapolations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 413-429.
    6. Tomac Cater & Danijel Pucko, 2010. "Factors of effective strategy implementation: Empirical evidence from Slovenian business practice," Journal of East European Management Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(3), pages 207-236.
    7. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    8. Teixeira, Rafael & Koufteros, Xenophon & Peng, Xiaosong David, . "Organizational Structure, Integration, And Manufacturing Performance: A Conceptual Model And Propositions," Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (FGV EAESP), vol. 5(01).
    9. Sanghoon Lee, 2008. "Ownership Structure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Panel Data of South Korea," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2008_17, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    10. Nils Stieglitz & Klaus Heine, 2007. "Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Jeroen Kraaijenbrink & Fons Wijnhoven, 2008. "Managing heterogeneous knowledge: a theory of external knowledge integration," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 274-286, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaime Rivera, 2019. "An integral model for the implementation of environmental policy strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 909-920, July.
    2. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.
    3. Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Francisca Sempere-Ripoll & Carles Boronat-Moll, 2014. "Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 873-886, December.
    4. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    5. Dildar Hussain & Marijana Sreckovic & Josef Windsperger, 2018. "An organizational capability perspective on multi-unit franchising," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 717-727, April.
    6. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    7. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    8. Lobo, Sunila & Whyte, Jennifer, 2017. "Aligning and Reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 93-107.
    9. Sascha Kraus & Alexander Brem & Miriam Schuessler & Felix Schuessler & Thomas Niemand, 2019. "Innovative Born Globals: Investigating the Influence of Their Business Models on International Performance," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem & Joe Tidd & Tugrul Daim (ed.), Managing Innovation Internationalization of Innovation, chapter 11, pages 275-328, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Cheng, Ru & Tao, Lei & Wang, Qiang & Zhao, Xiande, 2023. "The impact of value co-creation orientation on radical service innovation: Exploring a serial mediation mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. Annarelli, Alessandro & Battistella, Cinzia & Nonino, Fabio & Parida, Vinit & Pessot, Elena, 2021. "Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Laura Carraresi & Xhevrie Mamaqi & Luis Miguel Albisu & Alessandro Banterle, 2016. "Can Strategic Capabilities Affect Performance? Application of RBV to Small Food Businesses," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 416-436, July.
    13. Suming Wu & Hui Gao, 2022. "How Internal IT Capability Affects Open Innovation Performance: From Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    14. Côrte-Real, Nadine & Oliveira, Tiago & Ruivo, Pedro, 2017. "Assessing business value of Big Data Analytics in European firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 379-390.
    15. Khalid, Saba & Bhatti, Khalid, 2015. "Entrepreneurial competence in managing partnerships and partnership knowledge exchange: Impact on performance differences in export expansion stages," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 598-608.
    16. Ryan, Paul & Geoghegan, Will & Hilliard, Rachel, 2018. "The microfoundations of firms’ explorative innovation capabilities within the triple helix framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 15-27.
    17. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Henk W. Volberda & Nicolai J. Foss & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2010. "PERSPECTIVE---Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 931-951, August.
    19. Kim, Sung Min & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "Resource Co-specialization, Firm Growth, and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Restructuring and IT Implementations," Working Papers 08-0107, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    20. Ghosh, Saibal, 2016. "Banker on board and innovative activity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4205-4214.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:24-38:id:843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.