IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbrqaa/v22y2022p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational Management as an Imperative of High Business Results

Author

Listed:
  • Darko Popadić

    (Faculty of Business and Law, University "MB" Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ljiljana Kontić

    (Faculty of Business and Law, University MB, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vlada Živanović

    (State Audit Office, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nada Živanović

    (Faculty of Business and Law, University "MB" Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The business of companies in modern conditions is exposed to major changes related to systematic and systematic investment in employee education, especially management, which is an attempt to maximize productivity and improve individual and organizational knowledge. An important premise is the acceptance and understanding of the fact that systematic investment in employees is an opportunity to improve various business processes within the business company. Management has the task of achieving product quality and overall business of its own company based on a quality educational approach. Therefore, it is necessary to adequately design, implement, monitor and evaluate the process of education and training. Thus, the choice of quality methodology of the educational process is a complementary part of establishing a continuous model of training, which is the competitive strength of modern organizations. A systematic approach to the choice of training methodology allows organizations to connect the planned activity with the real business needs of both individuals and organizations. At the end of each training process, the results of the training are obtained as the end result of changing and shaping the skills, abilities, attitudes and behavior of employees according to the needs of organizational goals. The implications of training should be visible in various activities of employees, such as: job satisfaction, increased productivity, ability to manage complex processes and other functions that explicitly affect the competitiveness of the organization. The paper presents the management of the educational process for achieving high results and goals that are closely related to organizational goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Darko Popadić & Ljiljana Kontić & Vlada Živanović & Nada Živanović, 2022. "Educational Management as an Imperative of High Business Results," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 22, pages 1-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:22:y:2022:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.32038/mbrq.2022.22.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/384/mbrq.2022.22.01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/mbrq.2022.22.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Cappelli & Martin J. Conyon, 2018. "What Do Performance Appraisals Do?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(1), pages 88-116, January.
    2. Mariana POPA (PETRESCU), 2022. "The Link Between The Development Of Human Resources And The Overall Efficiency Of The Organization In The Case Of Staff In Romanian Pre-University Education," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 57-64, May.
    3. Abdoulla Karimi & Hadi Teimouri & Arash Shahin & Ali Shaemi Barzoki, 2019. "Identification and ranking of competency-based recruitment system criteria: an empirical case study," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 21-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pratima Sarangi & Ratnakar Mishra & Amarnath Padhi, 2025. "Balancing skills and expectations: AHP analysis of competency-based recruitment in the EdTech sector," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Naveed Ahmad Khan & Andrija Mihoci & Silke Michalk & Kirill Sarachuk & Hafiz Ali Javed, 2022. "Employee Performance Measures Appraised by Training and Labor Market: Evidence from the Banking Sector of Germany," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Houldsworth, Elizabeth & Marra, Marianna & Brewster, Chris & Brookes, Michael & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Performance appraisal and MNEs: The impact of different capitalist archetypes," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    4. Grund, Christian & Sliwka, Dirk & Titz, Krystina, 2024. "Works councils as gatekeepers: Codetermination, management practices, and job satisfaction," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Alan Benson & Ben A. Rissing, 2020. "Strength from Within: Internal Mobility and the Retention of High Performers," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1475-1496, November.
    6. Michael Rivera & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar & Tony Petrucci, 2021. "Are Traditional Performance Reviews Outdated? An Empirical Analysis on Continuous, Real-Time Feedback in the Workplace," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 517-540, June.
    7. Rocio Bonet & Tor Eriksson & Jaime Ortega, 2019. "Up for Review: Unravelling the Link between Formal Evaluations and Performance‐Based Rewards," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 108-137, January.
    8. Abraham, Lisa, 2023. "The gender gap in performance reviews," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 459-492.
    9. Grund, Christian & Sliwka, Dirk & Titz, Krystina, 2023. "Works Councils as Gatekeepers: Codetermination, Monitoring Practices, and Job Satisfaction," IZA Discussion Papers 15956, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Marc ALIANA & Diego PRIOR, 2023. "Fifty years of research on internal promotions: Where are we going? An interdisciplinary review and bibliometric analysis," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(4), pages 45-61, December.
    11. Heilman, Madeline E. & Manzi, Francesca & Caleo, Suzette, 2019. "Updating impressions: The differential effects of new performance information on evaluations of women and men," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 105-121.
    12. Mariia Petryk & Michael Rivera & Siddharth Bhattacharya & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "How Network Embeddedness Affects Real-Time Performance Feedback: An Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1467-1489, December.
    13. Grund, Christian & Sliwka, Dirk & Titz, Krystina, 2019. "Works Councils and Performance Appraisals," IZA Discussion Papers 12670, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Ndalahwa Musa Masanja, PhD & Ndalahwa Adelphina Rweyemamu, 2020. "The Factors Affecting the Implementation of 360 Degree Feedback on Organizational Performance for Selected Companies Located in Arusha," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(7), pages 113-121, July.
    15. Kathrin Manthei & Dirk Sliwka & Timo Vogelsang, 2023. "Talking About Performance or Paying for It? A Field Experiment on Performance Reviews and Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2198-2216, April.
    16. Alice Soldà & Marie Claire Villeval, 2025. "Narratives as a Persuasion Tool in Performance Appraisals," Working Papers 2505, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    17. Manthei, Kathrin & Sliwka, Dirk & Vogelsang, Timo, 2019. "Talking about Performance or Paying for it? Evidence from a Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 12446, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:22:y:2022:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.