IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apn/agregt/v5y2021i1p56-77id6934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Triple Helix and The Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Framework for Creative Economic Marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Nuryadi Wijiharjono

Abstract

In essence, the concept of the Triple Helix describes a model of the cooperative relationship between universities, industry, and government. The purpose of this study is to formulate a conceptual framework for the relationship between institutions in the Triple Helix for improving the development of innovation capabilities to obtain a high marketing performance in creative-economy SMEs. The method used in this study is a systematic review with a resource-based view (RBV) perspective based on authoritative, relevant, and up-to-date reference sources. This study attempts to identify the main factors that influence innovation capabilities and marketing performance and to describe the complexity of various concepts, such as the concepts of intellectual capital, innovation capabilities, and creative economy, to create a comprehensive, logical, and methodical conceptual framework. This study contributes to the marketing management literature by developing the Triple Helix model to build innovation capabilities and marketing performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuryadi Wijiharjono, 2021. "The Triple Helix and The Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Framework for Creative Economic Marketing," Agregat: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR HAMKA., vol. 5(1), pages 56-77.
    • Handle: RePEc:apn:agregt:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:56-77:id:6934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/agregat/article/view/6934
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. Neil A. Morgan & Douglas W. Vorhies & Charlotte H. Mason, 2009. "Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 909-920, August.
    3. Shantanu Dutta & Om Narasimhan & Surendra Rajiv, 2005. "Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: methodology and empirical application," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 277-285, March.
    4. Douglas W. Vorhies & Robert E. Morgan & Chad W. Autry, 2009. "Product‐market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(12), pages 1310-1334, December.
    5. Scott L. Newbert, 2008. "Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 745-768, July.
    6. Morgan, Neil A. & Clark, Bruce H. & Gooner, Rich, 2002. "Marketing productivity, marketing audits, and systems for marketing performance assessment: integrating multiple perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 363-375, May.
    7. Robin S. Lee & Tim Wu, 2009. "Subsidizing Creativity through Network Design: Zero-Pricing and Net Neutrality," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(3), pages 61-76, Summer.
    8. G. Tomas M. Hult & Jeannette A. Mena & O. C. Ferrell & Linda Ferrell, 2011. "Stakeholder marketing: a definition and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(1), pages 44-65, March.
    9. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    10. Stanley Slater & Eric Olson & Carol Finnegan, 2011. "Business strategy, marketing organization culture, and performance," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 227-242, September.
    11. Giovanna Michelon & Giacomo Boesso & Kamalesh Kumar, 2013. "Examining the Link between Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: An Analysis of the Best Corporate Citizens," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 81-94, March.
    12. Maureen Blyler & Russell W. Coff, 2003. "Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(7), pages 677-686, July.
    13. Nick Clifton & Robyn Keast & David Pickernell & Martyn Senior, 2010. "Network Structure, Knowledge Governance, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Innovation Networks and SMEs in the UK," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 337-373, September.
    14. Michael Storper & Allen J. Scott, 2009. "Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 147-167, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wijiharjono, Nuryadi, 2021. "The triple helix dan kapabilitas inovasi: Sebuah kerangka konseptual pemasaran ekonomi kreatif [The triple helix and innovation capabilities: A Conceptual framework of marketing for the creative ec," MPRA Paper 108263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Sok, Phyra & O’Cass, Aron & Sok, Keo Mony, 2013. "Achieving superior SME performance: Overarching role of marketing, innovation, and learning capabilities," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 161-167.
    5. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    6. Don Jyh-Fu Jeng & Artur Pak, 2016. "The variable effects of dynamic capability by firm size: the interaction of innovation and marketing capabilities in competitive industries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 115-130, March.
    7. Pinho, José Carlos & Prange, Christiane, 2016. "The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 391-403.
    8. Lu Xin & Fangcheng Tang & Shuwei Zhang & Zhen Pan, 2020. "Social Capital and Sustainable Innovation in Small Businesses: Investigating the Role of Absorptive Capacity, Marketing Capability and Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Krzysztof Borodako & Jadwiga Berbeka & Michał Rudnicki, 2021. "Innovation Orientation in Business Services," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19897.
    10. Cristina Fernandes & João J. Ferreira & Mário L. Raposo & Cristina Estevão & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2017. "The dynamic capabilities perspective of strategic management: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 529-555, July.
    11. Adriana Roseli Wünsch Takahashi & Sergio Bulgacov & Elder Semprebon & Mônica Maier Giacomini, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities, Marketing Capability and Organizational Performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(5), pages 466-478, September.
    12. Takata, Hidesuke, 2016. "Effects of industry forces, market orientation, and marketing capabilities on business performance: An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturers from 2009 to 2011," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5611-5619.
    13. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Moffett, Sandra, 2021. "Mission or margin? Using dynamic capabilities to manage tensions in social purpose organisations’ business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 643-657.
    14. Sun, Wenbin & Ding, Yuan, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and cash flow volatility: The curvilinear moderation of marketing capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 48-59.
    15. Cabrera-Suárez, M. Katiuska & de la Cruz Déniz-Déniz, Mª & Martín-Santana, Josefa D., 2011. "Familiness and market orientation: A stakeholder approach," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 34-42, March.
    16. Byoungho Jin & Sojin Jung & So Won Jeong, 2018. "Dimensional effects of Korean SME’s entrepreneurial orientation on internationalization and performance: the mediating role of marketing capability," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 195-215, March.
    17. Zhang, Yucheng & Hou, Zhongwei & Yang, Feifei & Yang, Miles M. & Wang, Zhiling, 2021. "Discovering the evolution of resource-based theory: Science mapping based on bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 500-516.
    18. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2017. "Marketing capabilities, positional advantage, and performance of born global firms: Contingent effect of ambidextrous innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 527-543.
    19. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    20. Mostafiz, Md Imtiaz & Ahmed, Farhad Uddin & Tardios, Janja & Hughes, Paul & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2025. "Configuring international entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic internationalization capability to predict international performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apn:agregt:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:56-77:id:6934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susilo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/agregat/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.