IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/japsss/2019p60-66.html

Effects of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) on sustainable agricultural and aquaculture production for rural development

Author

Listed:
  • Gokhan Arslan

    (Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey)

  • Nicoleta Anca Sutan

    (Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey)

  • Telat Yanik

    (Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey)

Abstract

Poverty, unemployment, lack of land, etc., are the most common problems in rural areas. Agriculture, by its nature, has a multi-functional role and is resourceful to operate within the environmental, social and economic dimensions. Various types of aquaculture are an important component of the development of agricultural systems. These will help reduce food scarcity, hunger, and deprivation by providing high nutritious value food, jobs, and employment growth, increasing the potential for monoculture failure, enhancing water quality, enhancing aquatic resource management, and sustainable farming. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) provide an opportunity to overcome the constraints on food availability and accessibility, particularly in underdeveloped countries and those areas considered infertile, inappropriate and/or unprofitable for arable farming. In addition, GMOs modified for input characteristics (e.g., herbicide or insect resistance crops, disease resistance fish), Genetically Modified (GM) crops with improved nutritional characteristics (e.g., higher levels of beta-carotene, vitamin A precursor) and GMOs modified tolerate environmental stress (e.g., drought, cold and/or salinity) may be successfully adopted in the interest of subsisting agricultural systems. In this analysis, which is focused on general aspects of rural development, knowledge extracted from various sources is addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gokhan Arslan & Nicoleta Anca Sutan & Telat Yanik, 2019. "Effects of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) on sustainable agricultural and aquaculture production for rural development," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 5(2), pages 60-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:japsss:2019:p:60-66
    DOI: 10.20474/japs-5.2.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-japs5.2.3.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Japs-5.2.3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/japs-5.2.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Bruce Traill, 2004. "Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(2), pages 179-204, June.
    2. Tilman, David & Polasky, Stephen & Lehman, Clarence, 2005. "Diversity, productivity and temporal stability in the economies of humans and nature," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 405-426, May.
    3. Matin Qaim & Greg Traxler, 2005. "Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 73-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milazzo, M.F. & Spina, F. & Cavallaro, S. & Bart, J.C.J., 2013. "Sustainable soy biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 806-852.
    2. Hervouet, Adrien & Langinier, Corinne, . "Plant Breeders’ Rights, Patents, and Incentives to Innovate," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(01).
    3. McFadden, Brandon R. & Lusk, Jayson L., 2013. "Effects of Cost and Campaign Advertising on Support for California’s Proposition 37," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Heng, Dora, 2015. "Incentives, Institutions and Investment in Private Agricultural Reasearch in Asia," SS-AAEA Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2015, pages 1-25.
    5. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2020. "Crop diversity, household welfare and consumption smoothing under risk: Evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Sydorovych, Olha & Marra, Michele C., 2007. "A Genetically Engineered Crop's Impact on Pesticide Use: A Revealed-Preference Index Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(3), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Su, Lianfan & Adam, Brian D. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Arthur, Frank, 2011. "A Comparison of Auction and Choice Experiment: An Application to Consumer Willingness to Pay for Rice with Improved Storage Management," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103975, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Mintewab Bezabih Ayele & Jesper Stage, 2019. "How much is too much? Individual biodiversity conservation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 247-255.
    9. Li Zhao & Shumin Liu & Haiying Gu & David Ahlstrom, 2023. "Risk Amplification, Risk Preference and Acceptance of Transgenic Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Graham Brookes & Tun-Hsiang (Edward) Yu & Simla Tokgoz & Amani Elobeid, 2010. "Production and Price Impact of Biotech Crops, The," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 10-wp503, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Brendan Fisher & Stephen Polasky & Thomas Sterner, 2011. "Conservation and Human Welfare: Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 151-159, February.
    12. Phélinas, Pascale & Choumert, Johanna, 2017. "Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 452-462.
    13. Grebitus, Carola & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2013. "Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 67-75.
    14. Hu, R. & Deng, H., 2018. "A Crisis of Consumers’ Trust in Scientists and Influence on Consumer Attitude," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276047, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.
    16. Dillen, Koen & Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2008. "The Global Welfare Effects of GM Sugar Beet under Changing Sugar Policies," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43944, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Campbell, Benjamin & Khachatryan, Hayk & Behe, Bridget & Dennis, Jennifer & Hall, Charles, 2015. "Consumer Perceptions of Eco-friendly and Sustainable Terms," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 21-34, April.
    18. José G. Vargas-Hernández & Justyna Zdunek-Wielgołaska, 2021. "Urban green infrastructure as a tool for controlling the resilience of urban sprawl," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1335-1354, February.
    19. Pascual, Unai & Narloch, Ulf & Nordhagen, Stella & Drucker, Adam G., . "The economics of agrobiodiversity conservation for food security under climate change," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(01), pages 1-30.
    20. Eija Pehu & Catherine Ragasa, 2008. "Agricultural Biotechnology : Transgenics in Agriculture and their Implications for Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Reports 9042, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:japsss:2019:p:60-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.