IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v20y2023i1p58-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role and Importance of Liquidity Preference, Marginal Efficiency of Capital, and Marginal Propensity to Consume in Keynes's General Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Usman Ghani

    (Doctoral School of Regional and Economic Sciences (English), Széchenyi István University (University of Gyor), Hungary.)

  • Md Kamal Hossain

    (Doctoral School of Regional and Economic Sciences (English), Széchenyi István University (University of Gyor), Hungary.)

Abstract

This article builds an understanding of Keynes’ General Theory as an advancement upon the Classical theory of economics with the introduction of new postulates including analysis of the propensity to consume, marginal efficiency of capital and the concept of the rate of interest. Based upon Keynesian General Theory, the key concepts, and variables of Liquidity Preference, Marginal Efficiency of Capital, and Marginal Propensity to Consume are familiarized and elaborated in terms of their role and importance in theory. Different references have been cited to support the interpretations as originally presented in Keynes’s General Theory. Literature has widely discussed the vital postulates of Keynes on the principle of effective demand, the consumption function, multiplier and interest rate, interest rate and investment. These postulates take account of the subjected variables and elaborate on the importance of these in Keynes General theory and models. Furthermore, the criticism of General theory is discussed, and conclusions are drawn at the end of the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Usman Ghani & Md Kamal Hossain, 2023. "The Role and Importance of Liquidity Preference, Marginal Efficiency of Capital, and Marginal Propensity to Consume in Keynes's General Theory," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 20(1), pages 58-70.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:58-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/2056.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-20-issue-1/5591
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carroll, Christopher D & Kimball, Miles S, 1996. "On the Concavity of the Consumption Function," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 981-992, July.
    2. J. Tobin, 1958. "Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 25(2), pages 65-86.
    3. Raul Rojas, 2017. "The Keynesian Model in the General Theory: A Tutorial," Papers 1708.07509, arXiv.org.
    4. P. T. Ellsworth, 1936. "Mr. Keynes on the Rate of Interest and the Marginal Efficiency of Capital," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(6), pages 767-767.
    5. Barens, Ingo, 2011. ""Animal spirits" in John Maynard Keynes's general theory of employment, interest and money: Some short and sceptical remarks," Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics 201, Darmstadt University of Technology, Department of Law and Economics.
    6. J. M. Keynes, 1997. "The General Theory of Employment," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 5.
    7. L. Randall Wray, 1995. "Keynesian Monetary Theory: Liquidity Preference or Black Box Horizontalism?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 273-282, March.
    8. Dennis H. Robertson, 1936. "Some Notes on Mr. Keynes' General Theory of Employment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(1), pages 168-191.
    9. John Harvey, 2010. "Keynes’ Business Cycle: Animal Spirits and Crisis," Working Papers 201003, Texas Christian University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Paula Martins, 2008. "Uninsurable Risks: Uncertainty in Production, the Value of Information and Price Dispersion," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 28(8), pages 1.
    2. Claudio Sardoni, 2017. "Circuitist and Keynesian Approaches to Money: A Reconciliation?," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 205-227, May.
    3. Per Krusell & Anthony Smith & Joachim Hubmer, 2015. "The historical evolution of the wealth distribution: A quantitative-theoretic investigation," 2015 Meeting Papers 1406, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2018. "Vine copulas: modelling systemic risk and enhancing higher‐moment portfolio optimisation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(S1), pages 423-463, November.
    5. Alan J. Auerbach, 1981. "Evaluating the Taxation of Risky Assets," NBER Working Papers 0806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Tae-Hwy Lee & Ekaterina Seregina, 2020. "Optimal Portfolio Using Factor Graphical Lasso," Papers 2011.00435, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    7. Hong, Claire Yurong & Lu, Xiaomeng & Pan, Jun, 2021. "FinTech adoption and household risk-taking," BOFIT Discussion Papers 14/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    8. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Felix Chopra & Ingar Haaland, 2023. "Conducting qualitative interviews with AI," CEBI working paper series 23-06, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    10. Konrad, Kai A., 1989. "Kapitaleinkommensteuern und beschleunigte Abschreibungen bei Unsicherheit," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 47(3), pages 404-427.
    11. Christopher D. Carroll, 2000. "Requiem for the Representative Consumer? Aggregate Implications of Microeconomic Consumption Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(2), pages 110-115, May.
    12. Al-Jarhi, Mabid, 2002. "Macroeconomics: an Islamic Perspective," MPRA Paper 66938, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2004.
    13. Mr. Evan C Tanner & Mr. Kevin J Carey, 2005. "The Perils of Tax Smoothing: Sustainable Fiscal Policy with Random Shocks to Permanent Output," IMF Working Papers 2005/207, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Claus Dierksmeier, 2011. "The Freedom–Responsibility Nexus in Management Philosophy and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 263-283, June.
    15. Dipankar Mondal & N. Selvaraju, 2022. "Convexity, two-fund separation and asset ranking in a mean-LPM portfolio selection framework," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 225-248, March.
    16. Anders Johansson, 2009. "An analysis of dynamic risk in the Greater China equity markets," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 299-320.
    17. Lloyd, S. P., 2017. "Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Interest Rate Channel: Signalling and Portfolio Rebalancing," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1735, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. Chia-Lin Chang & Jukka Ilomäki & Hannu Laurila & Michael McAleer, 2018. "Long Run Returns Predictability and Volatility with Moving Averages," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Hany Shawky & Ronald Forbes & Alan Frankle, 1983. "Liquidity Services and Capital Market Equilibrium: The Case for Money Market Mutual Funds," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 141-152, June.
    20. Clare Kelly & Gauthier Lanot, 2003. "Analytical Results for a Model of Periodic Consumption," Keele Economics Research Papers KERP 2003/01, Centre for Economic Research, Keele University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:58-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.