IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersfr/266220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Per Capita Food Supply Trends: Progress Toward Dietary Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Putnam, Judy
  • Kantor, Linda Scott
  • Allshouse, Jane

Abstract

F ederal dietary guidance outlined in the 2000 edition of Dietary Guidelines for Americans and depicted in the Food Guide Pyramid is intended to help consumers choose diets that improve health, reduce their risk for dietrelated chronic disease, and meet their nutritional needs (fig. 1). The Food Guide Pyramid helps consumers put the Dietary Guidelines into practice by recommending the type and quantity of foods to eat from five major food groupsgrains (bread, cereals, rice, and pasta), vegetables, fruit, dairy (milk, yogurt, and cheese), and meat (red meat, poultry, fish, dry beans, eggs, and nuts). The Pyramid also suggests that consumers use fats, oils, and sweets sparingly. The Dietary Guidelines recommend that Americans limit total fat intake to no more than 30 percent of calories, saturated fat intake to less than 10 percent of calories, and dietary cholesterol to less than the Daily Value of 300 milligrams a day listed on the Nutrition Facts Label. Information about consumers' eating patterns, if different from these recommendations, helps consumers make dietary adjustments and helps policymakers and nutrition educators target educational messages effectively. For example, analyses of food supply data, adjusted for spoilage and waste, by USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) suggest that the average American diet is heavily weighted to added fats and sugars found at the tip of the Pyramid and falls short of recommendations for fruits and dairy products. And many consumers need to change the mix of foods in the meat, vegetable, and grain groups to meet recommendations for dietary variety and selected food components, such as fiber, total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol.

Suggested Citation

  • Putnam, Judy & Kantor, Linda Scott & Allshouse, Jane, 2000. "Per Capita Food Supply Trends: Progress Toward Dietary Guidelines," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 23(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266220
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266220/files/FoodReview-223.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266220/files/FoodReview-223.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kantor, Linda Scott, 1998. "A Dietary Assessment of the U.S. Food Supply: Comparing Per Capita Food Consumption with Food Guide Pyramid Serving Recommendations," Agricultural Economic Reports 34079, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine Moorman & Rosellina Ferraro & Joel Huber, 2012. "Unintended Nutrition Consequences: Firm Responses to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 717-737, September.
    2. Gerrior, Shirley & Bente, Lisa, 2001. "Food Supply Nutrients and Dietary Guidance, 1970-99," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 24(3), pages 1-8.
    3. Peters, Christian & Bills, Nelson L. & Wilkins, Jennifer & Smith, R. David, 2002. "Vegetable Consumption, Dietary Guidelines and Agricultural Production in New York State—Implications for Local Food Economies," Research Bulletins 122636, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Variyam, Jayachandran N. & Golan, Elise, 2002. "New Health Information Is Reshaping Food Choices," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 25(1).
    2. Padilla, Luis, 2001. "Fruit Consumption: Dietary Health And Policy Implications," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20538, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Stewart, Hayden & Blisard, Noel & Jolliffe, Dean, 2003. "Do Income Constraints Inhibit Spending on Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Households?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Katy Giombolini & Kimberlee Chambers & Sheridan Schlegel & Jonnie Dunne, 2011. "Testing the local reality: does the Willamette Valley growing region produce enough to meet the needs of the local population? A comparison of agriculture production and recommended dietary requiremen," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(2), pages 247-262, June.
    5. Buzby, Jean C. & Farah-Wells, Hodan & Hyman, Jeffrey, 2014. "The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 164262, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Robert C. Johansson & Lisa Mancino & Joseph Cooper, 2006. "The big picture: Obesity, consumption, and food production," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 491-503.
    7. Unknown, 1999. "America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33604, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Wachenheim, Cheryl J. & Nganje, William E. & Kaitibie, Simeon & Johnston, Gretchen, 2005. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Breads Marketed as "Low-Carbohydrate"," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19428, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Campuzano, Jennifer & Ammon, Cara & Buzby, Jean C. & Bentley, Jeanine T. & Padera, Beth, 2016. "Updated Supermarket Shrink Estimates for Fresh Foods and Their Implications for ERS Loss-Adjusted Food Availability Data," Economic Information Bulletin 262142, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Muth, Mary K. & Karns, Shawn A. & Nielsen, Samara Joy & Buzby, Jean C. & Wells, Hodan Farah, 2011. "Consumer-Level Food Loss Estimates and Their Use in the ERS Loss- Adjusted Food Availability Data," Technical Bulletins 184307, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. McNamara, Paul E. & Ranney, Christine K. & Kantor, Linda Scott & Krebs-Smith, Susan M., 1999. "The gap between food intakes and the Pyramid recommendations: measurement and food system ramifications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 117-133, May.
    12. Jetter, Karen M. & Chalfant, James A. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2002. "The Welfare Effects Of Consuming A Cancer Prevention Diet," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19654, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 2001. "An Analysis Of Nutritional Label Use In The Southern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-5, March.
    14. Nir Y. Krakauer & Jesse C. Krakauer, 2022. "Diet Composition, Anthropometrics, and Mortality Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.