IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/401316.html

Korzyści Ekonomiczne Z Innowacji Proekologicznych A Zrównoważony Rozwój W Rolnictwie Północnego Mazowsza

Author

Listed:
  • WALCZEWSKA, OLGA
  • KAŁUŻA, HALINA

Abstract

W obliczu postępujących zmian klimatycznych oraz rosnącej presji na zasoby naturalne, coraz większego znaczenia nabierają innowacje technologiczne i proekologiczne praktyki stosowane w rolnictwie. W artykule podjęto temat korzyści ekonomicznych wynikających z wdrażania zrównoważonych praktyk w gospodarstwach rolnych, zlokalizowanych w sześciu powiatach północnego Mazowsza: ciechanowskim, makowskim, mławskim, płońskim, pułtuskim i przasnyskim. Na podstawie badań ankietowych przeprowadzonych w 2024 roku wśród 109 właścicieli gospodarstw, dokonano analizy wpływu innowacji na koszty produkcji, wielkość plonów, poziom dochodów i środowisko naturalne. Uwzględniono również kierunki produkcji i obszar gospodarstw, identyfikując różnice w percepcji korzyści i barier wdrażania innowacyjnych rozwiązań. Wyniki badań wskazują, że gospodarstwa wielofunkcyjne (łączące produkcje roślinną i zwierzęcą) częściej deklarowały pozytywne korzyści ekonomiczne. Większość respondentów (ponad 60%) uznała, że wdrożone innowacje miały pozytywny wpływ na środowisko. Jednocześnie zidentyfikowano istotne przeszkody we wdrażaniu rozwiązań innowacyjnych, takie jak: wysokie koszty początkowe, niedostateczne wsparcie ze strony instytucji publicznych i deficyt wiedzy. Przedstawiono analizę zależności statystycznych między cechami gospodarstw (takimi jak: lokalizacja, rodzaj produkcji, powierzchnia i wykształcenie właściciela) a uzyskiwanymi korzyściami ekonomicznymi i postrzeganymi barierami wdrażania innowacji. Wskazano również potrzeby i potencjalne kierunki działań wspierających rozwój zrównoważonego rolnictwa w regionach o tradycyjnym profilu produkcji rolnej.

Suggested Citation

  • Walczewska, Olga & Kałuża, Halina, 2025. "Korzyści Ekonomiczne Z Innowacji Proekologicznych A Zrównoważony Rozwój W Rolnictwie Północnego Mazowsza," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2025(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:401316
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401316/files/15%20%284%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Poczta-Wajda & Agnieszka Sapa & Sebastian Stępień & Michał Borychowski, 2020. "Food Insecurity among Small-Scale Farmers in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Konrad Prandecki & Wioletta Wrzaszcz & Marek Zieliński, 2021. "Environmental and Climate Challenges to Agriculture in Poland in the Context of Objectives Adopted in the European Green Deal Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    4. David Tilman & Kenneth G. Cassman & Pamela A. Matson & Rosamond Naylor & Stephen Polasky, 2002. "Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 671-677, August.
    5. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Sajjad Hussain & Shemei Zhang & Muhammad Khayyam & Muhammad Ihtisham & Simplice A. Asongu, 2021. "Potential Role of Technology Innovation in Transformation of Sustainable Food Systems: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turner, Katrine Grace & Anderson, Sharolyn & Gonzales-Chang, Mauricio & Costanza, Robert & Courville, Sasha & Dalgaard, Tommy & Dominati, Estelle & Kubiszewski, Ida & Ogilvy, Sue & Porfirio, Luciana &, 2016. "A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 190-207.
    2. Cheye, Stephen & Annan, Kenneth & Wang, Tong, 2026. "Adoption Dynamics of Ecological Agriculture Practices: Understanding the Complementarity and Intensity in the US Midwest," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 0(Preprint), June.
    3. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    4. Gulshan Kumar & Rutika & Vinod Sharma & Vinod Kumar, 2026. "Economic Feasibility and Production Analysis of Ghanajeevamrit as a Sustainable Bio-Input for Rain-Fed and Dry Land Agro-Ecosystem in North Western Himalayan Regions," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 13(3), pages 579-587, March.
    5. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    6. Ester Foppa Pedretti & Kofi Armah Boakye-Yiadom & Elena Valentini & Alessio Ilari & Daniele Duca, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Spinach Produced in Central and Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Siegmeier, Torsten & Möller, Detlev, 2013. "Mapping research at the intersection of organic farming and bioenergy — A scientometric review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 197-204.
    8. Qi-Qi CHEN & Jun-Biao ZHANG & Yu HUO, 2016. "A study on research hot-spots and frontiers of agricultural science and technology innovation - visualization analysis based on the Citespace III," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(9), pages 429-445.
    9. Haozhe Zhang & Jinyi Li, 2024. "Mapping the urban and rural planning response paths to pandemics of infectious diseases," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Dietrich, Anne Sophie & Carini, Valeria & Vico, Giulia & Bommarco, Riccardo & Hansson, Helena, 2025. "Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Clay, Nathan & King, Brian, 2019. "Smallholders’ uneven capacities to adapt to climate change amid Africa’s ‘green revolution’: Case study of Rwanda’s crop intensification program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Souhil Harchaoui & Petros Chatzimpiros, 2018. "Energy, Nitrogen, and Farm Surplus Transitions in Agriculture from Historical Data Modeling. France, 1882–2013," Post-Print hal-02999180, HAL.
    13. Xu, Zhuo & He, Ping & Yin, Xinyou & Huang, Qiuhong & Ding, Wencheng & Xu, Xinpeng & Struik, Paul C., 2023. "Can the advisory system Nutrient Expert® balance productivity, profitability and sustainability for rice production systems in China?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Komarek, Adam M. & Kwon, Hoyoung & Haile, Beliyou & Thierfelder, Christian & Mutenje, Munyaradzi J. & Azzarri, Carlo, 2019. "From plot to scale: ex-ante assessment of conservation agriculture in Zambia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 504-518.
    15. Wenting Jiang & Yingying Xing & Xiukang Wang & Xiaohu Liu & Zhigang Cui, 2020. "Developing a Sustainable Management Strategy for Quantitative Estimation of Optimum Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendation Rates for Maize in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Hossain, Tasmin & Jones, Daniela S. & Hartley, Damon S. & Thompson, David N. & Langholtz, Matthew & Davis, Maggie, 2022. "Nth-plant scenario for forest resources and short rotation woody crops: Biorefineries and depots in the contiguous US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    17. Alcon, Francisco & Marín-Miñano, Cristina & Zabala, José A. & de-Miguel, María-Dolores & Martínez-Paz, José M., 2020. "Valuing diversification benefits through intercropping in Mediterranean agroecosystems: A choice experiment approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Matteo Coronese & Martina Occelli & Francesco Lamperti & Andrea Roventini, 2024. "Towards sustainable agriculture: behaviors, spatial dynamics and policy in an evolutionary agent-based model," LEM Papers Series 2024/05, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    19. Hu, Liangliang & Guo, Liang & Zhao, Lufeng & Shi, Xiaoyu & Ren, Weizheng & Zhang, Jian & Tang, Jianjun & Chen, Xin, 2020. "Productivity and the complementary use of nitrogen in the coupled rice-crab system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Rótolo, G.C. & Montico, S. & Francis, C.A. & Ulgiati, S., 2015. "How land allocation and technology innovation affect the sustainability of agriculture in Argentina Pampas: An expanded life cycle analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 79-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:401316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.