IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/26515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Consumer Preferences For Major Food Markets In Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ho-Shui
  • Houston, Jack E.

Abstract

The Food Industry Research and Development Institute conducted a nationwide survey of food consumption in Taiwan in 1999. A sample of 1200 consumers responded to a questionnaire, which asked whether there was a use/visit experience in the past year for each of six types of food markets: traditional vegetable market, supermarket, hypermarket, consumer cooperative, chain convenience store, and grocery store. Questions also asked which types of food markets consumers used most frequently for the purchase of fresh foods, planned purchases or occasional purchases of processed foods, and what factors influenced consumers to choose their most frequently used market. Nearly 84 percent of surveyed consumers have used/visited traditional vegetable markets in the past year, while 47 percent choose traditional markets as their most frequented marketplace for buying fresh food in Taiwan. Some 81 percent of surveyed consumers have used or visited a supermarket in past year, while 17.7 percent and 29.0 percent choose supermarkets as the most frequented marketplace for planned and occasional purchases of processed foods, respectively. We apply stepwise logistic regression to identify significant sociodemographic factors (such as gender, age, and others) which influence the choice of each of the six major types of food markets and to identify the promotional factors which positively or negatively influence consumers' preferences for the most often used market. Female consumers have almost four times higher odds of frequently using traditional vegetable markets in the past year. The unmarried, divorced/widowed, and/or those who had higher family monthly incomes demonstrate lower odds of frequently using traditional markets. For purchases of fresh foods, female respondents, older consumers, and/or those living in northern Taiwan have higher odds of choosing traditional vegetable markets as the most frequently used market, while occupation "chief," and those with higher levels of education have lower odds of choosing traditional markets. Price level influences consumers positively in choosing traditional vegetable markets, while products with mark registrations, such as GMP or CAS, negatively influence this choice. For planned purchases of processed foods, older consumers are more likely than others to choose traditional vegetable markets, and price level is also a positive influence for choosing these markets. For occasional purchases of processed foods, manual laborers and/or those living in northern Taiwan have higher odds of choosing traditional vegetable markets, while unmarried respondents have lower odds. Price level and products with nutrition labeling are positive promotional factors influencing consumers to choose traditional vegetable markets. For the other five market types, sociodemographic factors influence consumers' choices of markets differently in each case, but marketing factors also influence choices of which type of marketplace to use most frequently.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ho-Shui & Houston, Jack E., 2001. "Factors Affecting Consumer Preferences For Major Food Markets In Taiwan," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26515
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.26515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/26515/files/32010097.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.26515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolfo M. Nayga, 1996. "Sociodemographic Influences on Consumer Concern for Food Safety: The Case of Irradiation, Antibiotics, Hormones, and Pesticides," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 467-475.
    2. Dickerson, Mary Dee & Gentry, James W, 1983. "Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 225-235, September.
    3. Kastens, Terry L. & Goodwin, Barry K., 1994. "An Analysis of farmers' Policy Attitudes and Preferences for Free Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 497-505, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koji Yasuda & Tomoko Kinugasa & Shigeyuki Hamori, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis Of Marital Status In Japan," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(03), pages 773-798, June.
    2. Craig Johns & Pamela Lyon & Randy Stringer & Wendy Umberger, 2017. "Changing urban consumer behaviour and the role of different retail outlets in the food industry of Fiji," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 24(1), pages 117-145, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pepermans, Roland & Verleye, Gino & Van Cappellen, Sarah, 1996. "'Wallbanking', innovativeness and computer attitudes: 25-40-year-old ATM-users on the spot," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 731-748, December.
    2. Desmichel, Perrine & Ordabayeva, Nailya & Kocher, Bruno, 2020. "What if diamonds did not last forever? Signaling status achievement through ephemeral versus iconic luxury goods," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 49-65.
    3. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    4. Kupeli, Birgul & Salman, Gulberk Gultekin & Karaosmanoglu, Elif & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Exploring self-service technology adoption: Case of airline check in," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Joe Cox, 2011. "The Economics of the Video-gaming Leisure Market," Chapters, in: Samuel Cameron (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Leisure, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Wolf, Christopher A. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2012. "Dairy Farmer Preferences for 2012 Farm Bill," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124866, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Chakravarty, Sugato & Dubinsky, Alan, 2005. "Individual investors' reactions to decimalization: Innovation diffusion in financial markets," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 89-103, February.
    9. Vellini, Nicolás Andrés & Lupín, Beatriz, 2021. "Aceptación de un sello de calidad hortícola. Una aplicación de tablas de contingencia a tres vías," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3498, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    10. Huh, Young Eun & Kim, Sang-Hoon, 2008. "Do early adopters upgrade early? Role of post-adoption behavior in the purchase of next-generation products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 40-46, January.
    11. Wilfred Kassangoye & Robert Rugimbana, 2013. "Internet adoption and usage patterns among Students in selected South African Universities," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(6), pages 376-384.
    12. Jae-Hwan Han & R. Wes Harrison, 2007. "Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 700-719.
    13. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    14. Meyners, Jannik & Barrot, Christian & Becker, Jan U. & Bodapati, Anand V., 2017. "Reward-scrounging in customer referral programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 382-398.
    15. Nikolaos E. Petridis & Georgios Digkas & Leonidas Anastasakis, 2020. "Factors affecting innovation and imitation of ICT in the agrifood sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 501-514, November.
    16. Demoussis, Michael & Giannakopoulos, Nicholas, 2006. "The dynamics of home computer ownership in Greece," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 73-86, March.
    17. K. Sudhir & Ishani Tewari, 2015. "Long Term Effects of "Prosperity in Youth" on Consumption: Evidence from China," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2025, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    18. He, Senhui & Fletcher, Stanley M. & Rimal, Arbindra, 2004. "Acceptance Of Irradiated Beef And Its Effect On Beef Consumption," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 35(1), pages 1-6, March.
    19. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    20. Joan Costa-Font & Elias Mossialos, 2005. "Is dread of Genetically Modified food associated with the consumers' demand for information?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(14), pages 859-863.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.