IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/354712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'elargissement de l'union douaniere europeenne aux pays d'Europe centrale et orientale Les enjeux pour les echanges agricoles et alimentaires des pays-tiers

Author

Listed:
  • Chevassus, Emmanuelle
  • Unguru, Manuela

Abstract

By the ceecs accession to the EU, the eu will enlarge its custom union. This implies both the adoption by the new incumbents of the Common external tariffs and the negotiation at the wro of a common list of commitments. The aim of this paper is to estimate, by the use of the Armington assumption, the likely changes in agro-food trade flows and the potential market access compensation issues when enlargement takes place.

Suggested Citation

  • Chevassus, Emmanuelle & Unguru, Manuela, 2002. "L'elargissement de l'union douaniere europeenne aux pays d'Europe centrale et orientale Les enjeux pour les echanges agricoles et alimentaires des pays-tiers," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 267.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354712
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.354712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/354712/files/ecoru_0013-0559_2002_num_267_1_5293.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.354712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baldwin, R E & Murray, Tracy, 1977. "MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benefits under the GSP," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 87(345), pages 30-46, March.
    2. Hickman, Bert G. & Lau, Lawrence J., 1973. "Elasticities of substitution and export demands in a world trade model," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 347-380, December.
    3. S. E. Frandsen & H. G. Jensen & D. M. Vanzetti, 2000. "Expanding ‘Fortress Europe’: Agricultural Trade and Welfare Implications of European Enlargement for Non‐member Regions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 309-329, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chevassus, Emmanuelle & Unguru, Manuela, 2002. "L'élargissement de l'union douanière européenne aux pays d'Europe centrale et orientale Les enjeux pour les échanges agricoles et alimentaires des pays-tiers," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 267.
    2. Acosta, Juan & Rancan, Antonella & Sergi, Francesco, 2022. "Centralised and Decentralised Approaches to Multi-Country Macroeconometric Modelling at the Commission of the European Communities: The Short-Lived EUROLINK Model," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp22081, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    3. Dutt, Pushan & Mihov, Ilian & Van Zandt, Timothy, 2013. "The effect of WTO on the extensive and the intensive margins of trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 204-219.
    4. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1980. "Effekte der Handelsschaffung und Handelsumlenkung," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3691, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Lord, Montague, 2000. "Viet Nam: Small Scale Technical assistance for Capacity Building of Ministry of Finance to Support Tariff, Industry and Subsidy Analysis for the WTO Accession," MPRA Paper 41158, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Udo, Eli A. & Obiora, Isitua K., 2006. "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the West African Monetary Zone: A System Equations Approach," Conference papers 331519, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. André Sapir & Lars Lundberg, 1984. "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences and Its Impacts," NBER Chapters, in: The Structure and Evolution of Recent US Trade Policy, pages 195-236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Philippe Martin & Thierry Mayer & Mathias Thoenig, 2008. "Make Trade Not War?," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(3), pages 865-900.
    9. Takashi YANO & Hiroyuki KOSAKA, 2010. "An International Input-Output Analysis on the Effects of Free Trade Agreements in Asia," EcoMod2004 330600163, EcoMod.
    10. Hiemenz U. & Langhammer, Rolf J., 1986. "Efficiency pre-conditions for successful integration of developing countries into the world economy," ILO Working Papers 992485213402676, International Labour Organization.
    11. Matthieu Crozet & Hélène Erkel‐Rousse, 2004. "Trade Performances, Product Quality Perceptions, and the Estimation of Trade Price Elasticities," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 108-129, February.
    12. Weatherspoon, Dave D. & Seale, James L., Jr., 1995. "Do The Japanese Discriminate Against Australian Beef Imports?: Evidence From The Differential Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-8, December.
    13. de Melo, Jaime & Winters, L Alan, 1990. "Voluntary Export Restraints and Resource Allocation in Exporting Countries," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 4(2), pages 209-233, May.
    14. Glebe, Thilo W. & Salhofer, Klaus, 2006. "Enlargement of Trade Blocs: National Welfare Effects If Trade Is Liberalized," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25529, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Mary Amiti & John Romalis, 2007. "Will the Doha Round Lead to Preference Erosion?," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 54(2), pages 338-384, June.
    16. Yamazaki, Fumiko, 1996. "Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4-5), pages 409-417.
    17. Frank Fuller & John C. Beghin & Jacinto Fabiosa & Samarendu Mohanty & Cheng Fang & Phillip Kaus, 2002. "Accession of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland to the European Union: Impacts on Agricultural Markets," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 407-428, March.
    18. Sarris, Alexander H., 1984. "World Trade in Fruits and Vegetables: Projections for an Enlarged European Community," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 305272, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Glebe, Thilo W., 2009. "Enlargement of the European Union: A movement towards the optimal trade bloc size?," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10.
    20. Van Zandt, Timothy & Mihov, Ilian & Dutt, Pushan, 2011. "Does WTO Matter for the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade?," CEPR Discussion Papers 8293, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.