IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ccsesa/231403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance in the Production of Organic, Biofertilized and Conventional Guava in Zitacuaro´s Region, Michoacan, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Navarro Chavez, Jose Cesar Lenin
  • Zamora Torres, America Ivonne

Abstract

The organic market is growing at a steady pace of 20 percent annually; this farming method can bring several advantages to the consumers and also to the farmers. Among other things organic farming does not have to rely on access to external inputs such as fertilizer and pesticides because the farmers make use of their own resources. This not only represents a friendlier environment to the farmer or the land but also can be cheaper. The aim of this study is to find out the yield differential between three productions systems (organic, biofertilized and conventional) of guava crops in Zitacuaro, Michoacan, Mexico. The results indicated that the most profitable crop in terms of production costs and profits on Zitacuaro´s region is the biofertilized crop that takes up the sustainable practices combined with conventional practices in a lesser proportion. While organic and conventional crops shows a slide difference between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Navarro Chavez, Jose Cesar Lenin & Zamora Torres, America Ivonne, 2012. "Performance in the Production of Organic, Biofertilized and Conventional Guava in Zitacuaro´s Region, Michoacan, Mexico," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 1(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:231403
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.231403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/231403/files/SAR-V1N1-p19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.231403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shujie Yao, 1997. "Comparative Advantages And Crop Diversification: A Policy Analysis Matrix For Thai Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 211-222, January.
    2. Reardon, Thomas & Berdegue, Julio & Escobar, German, 2001. "Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Latin America: Overview and Policy Implications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 395-409, March.
    3. Gerald C. Nelson & Martin Panggabean, 1991. "The Costs of Indonesian Sugar Policy: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 703-712.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fazleen, Abdul & Stephan, Von Cramon, 2015. "The Policy Analysis Matrix of Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210872, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Longwe-Ngwira, Abiba & Simtowe, Franklin & Siambi, Moses, 2012. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Groundnut Production in Malawi: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126429, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Basavaraj, G. & Rao, Parthasarathy P. & Achoth, Lalith & Reddy, Ravinder Ch., 2013. "Assessing Competitiveness of Sweet Sorghum for Ethanol Production: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 26(1), June.
    4. Preusse, Verena & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the context of urbanisation and environmental stress – Evidence from farmers in the rural-urban interface of Bangalore, India," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 312690, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Jan Fałkowski & Maciej Jakubowski & Paweł Strawiński, 2014. "Returns from income strategies in rural Poland," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 139-178, January.
    6. Almeida, Alexandre N. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2019. "Agricultural productivity, shadow wages and off-farm labor decisions in Nicaragua," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 99-110.
    7. Bagamba, Fredrick & Burger, Kees & Kuyvenhoven, Arie, 2007. "Determinants of smallholder farmer labour allocation decisions in Uganda," 106th Seminar, October 25-27, 2007, Montpellier, France 7920, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Maja Micevska & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2008. "Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in the Himalayas," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 163-193, October.
    9. Ghislain Kenguem Kinjouo & Marie Caroline Momo Solefack & Victor Francois Nguetsop, 2021. "Macroscopic and Microscopic Modifications of Wood after Debarking of Trees in the South Cameroon," Journal of Plant Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.
    10. Pisani, Elena, 2007. "L'evoluzione della ruralità nei Paesi in via di sviluppo (PVS). Approcci teorici ed applicativi [Evolution of rurality in Developing Countries (DCs). Theoretical and applied Approaches]," MPRA Paper 27732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Ruben, Ruerd & Pender, John, 2004. "Rural diversity and heterogeneity in less-favoured areas: the quest for policy targeting," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 303-320, August.
    12. Chang, Ching-Cheng & Lin, Kuo-Jung & Lin, Hsing-Chun & Liou, Ruey-Wan & Hsu, Sheng-Ming & Hsieh, De-Yan & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2016. "An Economy-wide Analysis of Trade Liberalization Impacts on Rural Household Income in Taiwan," Conference papers 330222, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Mane-Kapaj, Ana & Kapaj, Ilir & Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine & Totojani, Orkida, 2010. "Assessing the Comparative Advantage of Albanian Olive Oil Production," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, February.
    14. Carmen Diana Deere & Rosa Luz Durán & Merrilee Mardon & Tom Masterson, 2004. "Female Land Rights and Rural Household Incomes in Brazil, Paraguay and Peru," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2004-08, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    15. Mduma, John K. & Wobst, Peter, 2005. "Village Level Labor Market Development in Tanzania: Evidence from Spatial Econometrics," Discussion Papers 276260, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    16. Winters, Paul & Davis, Benjamin & Corral, Leonardo, 2002. "Assets, activities and income generation in rural Mexico: factoring in social and public capital," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 139-156, August.
    17. Radosław PASTUSIAK & Magdalena JASINIAK & Michał SOLIWODA & Joanna STAWSKA, 2017. "What may determine off-farm income? A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(8), pages 380-391.
    18. Paul Winters & Timothy Essam & Alberto Zezza & Benjamin Davis & Calogero Carletto, 2010. "Patterns of Rural Development: A Cross‐Country Comparison using Microeconomic Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 628-651, September.
    19. Ellis, Frank & Bahiigwa, Godfrey, 2003. "Livelihoods and Rural Poverty Reduction in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 997-1013, June.
    20. Adeoye, I.B. & Oni, O.A., 2014. "Competitiveness and Effects of Policies on Plantain Production Systems in Southwestern Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:231403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ccsenet.org/sar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.