IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/401372.html

Modelling efficiency dynamics and technological progress in the agricultural sector using the Malmquist index

Author

Listed:
  • Kyshakevych, Bohdan
  • Melnyk, Olga
  • Matviy, Igor
  • Lapchuk, Yaroslav
  • Kotyk, Yaroslav

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to model the dynamics of total factor productivity in the agricultural sectors of European Union countries and Ukraine using the DEA-based Malmquist productivity index (MPI), with its decomposition into technical efficiency change (EFFCH), technological change (TECHCH), and scale efficiency change (SECH), to identify the key drivers of productivity growth and assess cross-country differences in efficiency dynamics. Methodology. The study employs a non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) combined with the Malmquist productivity index to assess the dynamics of total factor productivity in the agricultural sectors of EU countries and Ukraine over 2015–2024. The index is decomposed into technical efficiency change, technological change, and, under variable returns to scale, pure (PECH) and scale efficiency change, enabling identification of key productivity drivers. The analysis is based on panel data for 28 decision-making units with multiple inputs and outputs. Estimation is conducted in R using the Benchmarking package, with average changes calculated via the geometric mean. Results. The results indicate a stable increase in total factor productivity in the agricultural sector, with the average Malmquist index exceeding unity for both EU countries (MPI = 1.025) and Ukraine (MPI = 1.021). Productivity growth is primarily driven by technological change (TECHCH > 1), while technical efficiency exhibits more moderate dynamics and declines during 2019–2021. Ukraine demonstrates a pattern where productivity gains are mainly driven by technological progress, accompanied by lower technical and scale efficiency, indicating the presence of structural inefficiencies. Originality. This study represents one of the first attempts to apply an integrated DEA-Malmquist framework to a unified panel of EU countries and Ukraine, enabling a comprehensive decomposition of productivity dynamics and identification of key drivers of total factor productivity growth. It identifies the dominant role of technological progress and reveals structural inefficiencies, particularly in Ukraine. Practical implications. The results provide a quantitative basis for improving agricultural policy and management decisions in EU countries and Ukraine. The findings highlight the need to complement technological modernisation with measures aimed at enhancing technical and scale efficiency, particularly in Ukraine. The study can be used by policymakers and stakeholders to design strategies for increasing productivity, optimising resource use, and strengthening competitiveness in the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyshakevych, Bohdan & Melnyk, Olga & Matviy, Igor & Lapchuk, Yaroslav & Kotyk, Yaroslav, 2026. "Modelling efficiency dynamics and technological progress in the agricultural sector using the Malmquist index," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401372
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401372/files/10_Kyshakevych_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu He & Wenkuan Chen, 2023. "Evaluation of Sustainable Development Policy of Sichuan Citrus Industry in China Based on DEA–Malmquist Index and DID Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Zhiwei Pan & Decai Tang & Haojia Kong & Junxia He, 2022. "An Analysis of Agricultural Production Efficiency of Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on a Three-Stage DEA Malmquist Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Siqi Liu & Yingqing Zhu & Weimiao Jing & Zhiwen Zhu, 2024. "Evaluation of Capital Utilization Efficiency in Agricultural Listed Firms Based on a Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis," Post-Print hal-05100702, HAL.
    4. Kucher, Lesia & Kucher, Anatolii & Khareba, Volodymyr & Demydchuk, Liudmyla & Skhidnytska, Halyna, 2023. "Development of innovation activities of agrarian enterprises: towards agribusiness 4.0," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    5. Apostolos Christopoulos & Ioannis Dokas & Sofia Katsimardou & Eleftherios Spyromitros, 2022. "The Malmquist Productivity measure for UK-listed firms in the aftermath of the global financial crisis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1617-1634, April.
    6. Nicolae Bobitan & Diana Dumitrescu & Valentin Burca, 2023. "Agriculture’s Efficiency in the Context of Sustainable Agriculture—A Benchmarking Analysis of Financial Performance with Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Qing Li & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Evaluation of Chinese Rapeseed Production Efficiency Based on Three-Stage DEA and Malmquist Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Dirk Beyer & Jana Hinke, 2026. "Long-term trends in economic and environmental efficiency of EU agriculture: A DEA-Malmquist approach," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 72(1), pages 56-67.
    9. Fare, Rolf & Shawna Grosskopf & Mary Norris & Zhongyang Zhang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 66-83, March.
    10. Adam Henryk Kagan, 2025. "Change in Productivity as the Primary Determinant of the Income of Agriculture After Poland’s Integration into the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    11. repec:ags:areint:342109 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kyshakevych, Bohdan & Melnyk, Olga & Maksyshko, Natalia & Maturin, Yuriy & Kotyk, Yaroslaw, . "Systemic issues and efficiency reserves in EU agriculture: a slack-based DEA approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yu & Zhong, Honglin & Kong, Fanbin & Zhang, Ning, 2023. "Can China achieve carbon neutrality without power shortage? A substitutability perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    3. Gilligan, Daniel O., 1998. "Farm Size, Productivity, And Economic Efficiency: Accounting For Differences In Efficiency Of Farms By Size In Honduras," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2014. "Measuring performance improvement of Taiwanese commercial banks under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 755-764.
    5. Managi, Shunsuke, 2006. "Are there increasing returns to pollution abatement? Empirical analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in pesticides," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 617-636, June.
    6. repec:lan:wpaper:3057 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jan Kluge & Sarah Lappöhn & Kerstin Plank, 2023. "Predictors of TFP growth in European countries," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 109-140, February.
    8. Ming Zhang & Wensheng Wang & Xialing Sun, 2023. "Measurement and Multiple Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in China’s Coal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2023. "Productivity analysis: roots, foundations, trends and perspectives," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 229-247, December.
    10. Mahlberg, Bernhard & Url, Thomas, 2010. "Single Market effects on productivity in the German insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1540-1548, July.
    11. Nsiri, Nour & Kleftodimos, Georgios & Drogué, Sophie, 2025. "Efficiency of agricultural systems in Morocco: A meta-frontier analysis of resource use and water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    12. Luo, Xueming, 2003. "Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 627-635, August.
    13. De Jorge-Moreno, Justo & González Santos, Arancha & Vegas Melero, José Jesús & Cepeda Olmedo, Martín, 2021. "Analysis of productivity in the Health Care Centers of the Community of Madrid (Spain) 2015-2017. || Análisis de la productividad en los Centros Sanitarios de la Comunidad de Madrid (España) 2015-2017," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 31(1), pages 384-396, June.
    14. An, Duong Hoai, 2022. "Performance of universities in Vietnam," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Ceyhun Elgin & Selman Çakır, 2015. "Technological progress and scientific indicators: a panel data analysis," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 263-281, April.
    16. Ari Francisco de Araujo Junior & Daniela Guimarães Nogueira & Cláudio D. Shikida, 2012. "Analysis of the efficiency of national civil construction firms," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(3), pages 45-70, July.
    17. Hu, Jin-Li & Wang, Shih-Chuan & Yeh, Fang-Yu, 2006. "Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 217-230, December.
    18. Somesh Kumar Mathur, 2005. "Growth Accounting for Some Selected Developing, Newly Industrialized and Developed Nations from 1966-2000: A Data Envelopment Analysis," GE, Growth, Math methods 0510009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Liying Zheng & Fangjuan Zhan & Fangrong Ren, 2025. "Carbon Dioxide Emission-Reduction Efficiency in China’s New Energy Vehicle Sector Toward Sustainable Development: Evidence from a Three-Stage Super-Slacks Based-Measure Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    21. Fujie, Takeshi & Senda, Tetsuji, 2019. "Effects of Aggregate Shocks on the Productivity of Farm Households in Prewar Japan," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 21.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.