IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/401372.html

Modelling efficiency dynamics and technological progress in the agricultural sector using the Malmquist index

Author

Listed:
  • Kyshakevych, Bohdan
  • Melnyk, Olga
  • Matviy, Igor
  • Lapchuk, Yaroslav
  • Kotyk, Yaroslav

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to model the dynamics of total factor productivity in the agricultural sectors of European Union countries and Ukraine using the DEA-based Malmquist productivity index (MPI), with its decomposition into technical efficiency change (EFFCH), technological change (TECHCH), and scale efficiency change (SECH), to identify the key drivers of productivity growth and assess cross-country differences in efficiency dynamics. Methodology. The study employs a non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) combined with the Malmquist productivity index to assess the dynamics of total factor productivity in the agricultural sectors of EU countries and Ukraine over 2015–2024. The index is decomposed into technical efficiency change, technological change, and, under variable returns to scale, pure (PECH) and scale efficiency change, enabling identification of key productivity drivers. The analysis is based on panel data for 28 decision-making units with multiple inputs and outputs. Estimation is conducted in R using the Benchmarking package, with average changes calculated via the geometric mean. Results. The results indicate a stable increase in total factor productivity in the agricultural sector, with the average Malmquist index exceeding unity for both EU countries (MPI = 1.025) and Ukraine (MPI = 1.021). Productivity growth is primarily driven by technological change (TECHCH > 1), while technical efficiency exhibits more moderate dynamics and declines during 2019–2021. Ukraine demonstrates a pattern where productivity gains are mainly driven by technological progress, accompanied by lower technical and scale efficiency, indicating the presence of structural inefficiencies. Originality. This study represents one of the first attempts to apply an integrated DEA-Malmquist framework to a unified panel of EU countries and Ukraine, enabling a comprehensive decomposition of productivity dynamics and identification of key drivers of total factor productivity growth. It identifies the dominant role of technological progress and reveals structural inefficiencies, particularly in Ukraine. Practical implications. The results provide a quantitative basis for improving agricultural policy and management decisions in EU countries and Ukraine. The findings highlight the need to complement technological modernisation with measures aimed at enhancing technical and scale efficiency, particularly in Ukraine. The study can be used by policymakers and stakeholders to design strategies for increasing productivity, optimising resource use, and strengthening competitiveness in the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyshakevych, Bohdan & Melnyk, Olga & Matviy, Igor & Lapchuk, Yaroslav & Kotyk, Yaroslav, 2026. "Modelling efficiency dynamics and technological progress in the agricultural sector using the Malmquist index," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401372
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401372/files/10_Kyshakevych_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.