IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9236-d1774009.html

Change in Productivity as the Primary Determinant of the Income of Agriculture After Poland’s Integration into the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Henryk Kagan

    (Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics—National Research Institute, Świętokrzyska Street 20, 00-002 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The article aimed to verify the development of the productivity level of Polish agriculture after EU integration as a key determinant of agricultural income. The research in this area was concerted because the productivity of agriculture (its technical efficiency) is a specific measure of its social efficiency, as it determines the level of wealth and social welfare and, at the same time, it is a determinant of its competitiveness in the long term. At the same time, it should be noted that after integration, agricultural production in Poland was carried out under conditions of extensive restrictions resulting from the adopted principles of the common agricultural policy aimed at increasing environmental sustainability. Productivity was measured on individual farm data using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Slacks-Based Model. The results were then extrapolated to the broader collective of commodity farms in Poland and indirectly applied to the entire population. The obtained results allowed for the conclusion that, during the first years of membership, there was a systematic decrease in productivity, which was observed from 2004 to 2011. The average value of the productivity factor for the research sample decreased from 0.230 to 0.208, while for the population it decreased from 0.224 to 0.202. After then, there was a reversal in the direction of the development trend, and in the following years, an upward trend emerged. Thus, the phenomenon of convergence in agricultural productivity with other EU countries, as the main factor influencing the direction of its changes in Poland after accession to the European Union, was not confirmed. Also, in the post-integration period, there was no change in the expected directions of interaction between the main determinants of agricultural income. Indeed, the theoretically formulated and empirically verified relations between subsidies and price relations and productivity were confirmed. Using the world price index as an explanatory variable in the multiple regression model, it was possible to explain, to a large extent, the variability of the productivity of Polish agriculture. Hence the implication for policymakers is that, despite high levels of subsidisation, the market is the main determinant of productivity changes. The weak impact of the price ratio index in Poland (‘price scissors’) on productivity volatility indicates that the increase in production costs, including those related to environmental protection (sustainability), has been effectively offset.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Henryk Kagan, 2025. "Change in Productivity as the Primary Determinant of the Income of Agriculture After Poland’s Integration into the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9236-:d:1774009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wigier, Marek, 2014. "The Competitiveness Of Polish Agriculture After Accession To The Eu," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(01), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Szajner, Piotr & Szczepaniak, Iwona, 2020. "The Evolution of The Agri-Food Sector in Terms of Economic Transformation, Membership in The EU and Globalization of The World Economy," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311269, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    3. Bożena Kusz & Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Maciej Oesterreich & Ludwik Wicki & Grzegorz Zimon, 2022. "Selected Economic Determinants of Labor Profitability in Family Farms in Poland in Relation to Economic Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Campos, Nauro F. & Coricelli, Fabrizio & Moretti, Luigi, 2019. "Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 88-104.
    5. Dariusz Kusz & Bożena Kusz & Paweł Hydzik, 2022. "Changes in the Price of Food and Agricultural Raw Materials in Poland in the Context of the European Union Accession," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Ryszard Kata & Małgorzata Wosiek, 2024. "Income Variability of Agricultural Households in Poland: A Descriptive Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Matthew Gorton & Carmen Hubbard & Lionel Hubbard, 2009. "The Folly of European Union Policy Transfer: Why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Does Not Fit Central and Eastern Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(10), pages 1305-1317, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Parzonko & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Marta Czekaj & Renata Płonka & Anna Justyna Parzonko, 2025. "Remuneration for Own Labour in Family-Run Dairy Farms Versus the Salaries and Wages in Non-Agricultural Sectors of the Economy—Evaluation of the Situation in Poland in 2005–2022," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Attila Jambor & Matthew Gorton, 2025. "Twenty years of EU accession: learning lessons from Central and Eastern European agriculture and rural areas," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Ryszard Kata & Małgorzata Wosiek & Agnieszka Brelik, 2025. "Scale and Determinants of Non-Agricultural Business Activity Among Farmers in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Alina Walenia & Malgorzata Wilczynska & Agnieszka Lew & Grzegorz Lew & Marta Pomykala & Ewelina Nycz, 2024. "Competitiveness of EU Member States According to the Index Institute of Management Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 770-788.
    5. Crafts, Nicholas, 2021. "What Can We Learn from the UK’s Post-1945 Economic Reforms?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1370, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    6. Georgieva, Vanya & Guerov, Gueorgui & Blagoeva, Nadezhda, . "Impact of economic and environmental factors on agricultural product pricing in the EU," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4).
    7. Mariam Camarero & Sergi Moliner & Cecilio Tamarit, 2021. "Is there a euro effect in the drivers of US FDI? New evidence using Bayesian model averaging techniques," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(4), pages 881-926, November.
    8. Robert Kraemer & Jonne Lehtimäki, 2024. "Government debt, European Institutions and fiscal rules: a synthetic control approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(4), pages 1112-1157, August.
    9. Barseghyan, Gayane, 2019. "Sanctions and counter-sanctions : What did they do?," BOFIT Discussion Papers 24/2019, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    10. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Francesca Caselli & Matilde Faralli & Paolo Manasse & Ugo Panizza, 2021. "On the Benefits of Repaying," IMF Working Papers 2021/233, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Vera Eichenauer & Ronald Indergand & Isabel Z. Martínez & Christoph Sax, 2020. "Constructing Daily Economic Sentiment Indices Based on Google Trends," KOF Working papers 20-484, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    13. Hazwan Haini & Lutfi Abdul Razak & Pang Wei Loon & Sufrizul Husseini, 2023. "Re-examining the finance–institutions–growth nexus: does financial integration matter?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1895-1924, June.
    14. Tomasz Serwach, 2023. "The European Union and within‐country income inequalities. The case of the new member states," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1890-1939, July.
    15. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Peter Bindzár, 2021. "Assessing the Level of Energy and Climate Sustainability in the European Union Countries in the Context of the European Green Deal Strategy and Agenda 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    16. Monasterolo, Irene & Benni, Federica, 2013. "Non parametric methods to assess the role of the CAP in regional convergence in Hungary," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(3), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Marios-Georgios PSYCHALIS, 2020. "Euro Plus Pact: The Greek Case," Noble International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 5(10), pages 102-124, October.
    18. Campos, Nauro F. & Eichenauer, Vera Z. & Sturm, Jan-Egbert, 2020. "Close encounters of the European kind: Economic integration, sectoral heterogeneity and structural reforms," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Robbert Maseland & Rok Spruk, 2023. "The benefits of US statehood: an analysis of the growth effects of joining the USA," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 17(1), pages 49-89, January.
    20. Donald Larson & Will Martin & Sebnem Sahin & Marinos Tsigas, 2016. "Agricultural Policies and Trade Paths in Turkey," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 1194-1224, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9236-:d:1774009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.